Oh, I meant the far-left groups, not the black nationalists groups. I know that sometimes it's confusing for people on the left and right, but Muslim and black nationalist terror and/or hate groups aren't far-left groups (normally). There is also the issue of why to separate out Islamist groups from the far-right, but not Dominionists and the like. I don't have a problem with it, but I can see the argument against it as having some validity. The murders from the guy who BLM wouldn't let join them does put a HUGE outlier in, depending on how one classifies it. That's one reason for the error range, as in where do those eight deaths actually fall? (The data stops in 2016, so the Portland killings aren't there either, and who knows where those two deaths belong.)

Fair enough - it's entirely possible I simply missed that the first time. I wouldn't put the black separatist groups on either - I suppose they tend to lean conservative socially, but most of their rhetoric is simply off the charts entirely. I suppose they often occupy the same realm as Alex Jones and the like - more interested in bizarre psuedoscience and conspiracy theory than anything else.
 
Antisemites criticize Israel. I shouldn't need to say it, but, the opinion of anrisemites don't count.
Well, yes you need to say it to evidence how ignorant you are of the actual facts. Anti-Zionism is not Anti-Semitism.

Find me ONE person who is not antisemitic who says that anybody who supports Israel's right to exist as a Jewish state is a racist Judeosupremecist

Could you explain that in English? It seems to be a move of the goalposts that now you want me to find you someone who makes that exact statement? That's not necessary to support what I claim - that there are many people, even many Jews, who are critical of Israel's behavior towards its non-Jewish minority. THAT was the discussion.

I would have no trouble finding you a number of people who match my description. I don't hang out with anti-semitic holocaust-denying neo nazi trash so I would probably have difficulty finding the straw man you've requested, though.
 
I understand the swastika really represents a broken or missing spine, four times over. Must be why their only topics are filth and dirt. Poor things!

Derail, it's generally considered to be a solar symbol as is the reversed swastika of the Bonpo religion.
 
Yes, I know. But that was one guy, and it's still not clear what happened. Even if we for the sake of argument assume that he deliberately was trying to kill as many as possible, it's still one guy. I'm not aware of too many incidents with white nationalists showing up and attacking people. Are you? I think that currently, that is more of the SOP of Antifa/BML/BAMN.

You've been long asserting that left wing extremism is somehow more dangerous than right wing extremism.

You've yet to provide any evidence of this.

Meanwhile, plenty of evidence to the contrary has been provided.
 
Of course you're going to find White Nationalists at a White Nationalist rally! What else would you expect? I think I figured out your problem--you're conflating White Nationalists with White supremacists and Nazis. Somehow you got the idea in your head that European Christians wanting to preserve a culture in which they find value and meaning is European Christian supremacism. That having strong borders and domestic policies designed to prevent assimilation and intermarriage with non-European Christians is bigotry or racism.

Yeah, nothing racist about those beliefs at all. :rolleyes:

Regardless of how wonderful you might think white nationalists are, when you're marching lockstep with people waving Nazi flags and chanting Nazi slogans, I'm probably not going to take the time to determine how the finer points of your ideology differ from theirs.
 
Yeah, nothing racist about those beliefs at all. :rolleyes:

Regardless of how wonderful you might think white nationalists are, when you're marching lockstep with people waving Nazi flags and chanting Nazi slogans, I'm probably not going to take the time to determine how the finer points of your ideology differ from theirs.

The basic difference between the Nazis and the standard white nationalist is that one is genocidal, whereas the other only supports mass forced migrations. Totally different crime against humanity!
 
...there are many people, even many Jews, who are critical of Israel's behavior towards its non-Jewish minority. THAT was the discussion.

I would have no trouble finding you a number of people who match my description. ...

If it helps you:
I am one person who is critical of particularly the current Israeli government because of their policies towards non-Jewish people within the realm of its reach.
It should be noted that this is a conservative, racially sensitive government with members who profess profound belief in the same god and much of the same scripture that many Republican politicians and many KKK/white supremacist types believe in - the scripture and the god some of them claim to defend against godless liberals and muslims.

To wit: This Israeli goverment is closely aligned with both the current US president and the Republican majorities in Congress.
 
Seems pretty clear this was a murder / domestic terrorist attack to me. The road behind him was clear. He comes speeding in from quite a ways back, into a crowd of anti-white-supremacist protestors. He's a white supremacist. No one attacked his car until he was already using it as a deadly weapon. Then he speeds off. Doesn't seem like rocket science, but we'll see what evidence comes out in court...
 
Last edited:
Well, yes you need to say it to evidence how ignorant you are of the actual facts. Anti-Zionism is not Anti-Semitism.



Could you explain that in English? It seems to be a move of the goalposts that now you want me to find you someone who makes that exact statement? That's not necessary to support what I claim - that there are many people, even many Jews, who are critical of Israel's behavior towards its non-Jewish minority. THAT was the discussion.
No, the discussion is the Charlottesville Car Crash Video. But since you asked, Ill try to explain it again from the beginning: people here (and in every media outlet around the world) use White Nationalist, White Supremacist, neo-Nazi, and Nazi interchangeably to describe the protesters at Charlottesville. That's wrong. They're not the same. White Nationalism isn't White supremacism. It's not Nazism. White Nationalism isn't inherently racist. White Nationalism is the moral equivalent of Zionism. Israel isn't perfect but it's existence as a Jewish state is a perfect example of how a people with nationalist aspirations can create a state that protects the interests of an ethnic majority without racism or a belief in their own superiority. People do criticize the state of Israel but nobody says Israel doesn't have a right to exist because ethnic nationalism is abhorrent immoral and racist and Jews who support Israel are dangerous Judeosupremacists who deserve to be punched.

You can be for or against nationalism in principle but you can't be selective about it.

If that doesn't help we can continue this conversation in another thread. To get back on topic, has any new video of the car crash surfaced? Or any evidence that this was more than a terrible accident that was triggered by the ANTIFA?
 
No, the discussion is the Charlottesville Car Crash Video. But since you asked, Ill try to explain it again from the beginning: people here (and in every media outlet around the world) use White Nationalist, White Supremacist, neo-Nazi, and Nazi interchangeably to describe the protesters at Charlottesville. That's wrong.They're not the same. White Nationalism isn't White supremacism. It's not Nazism.

Agreed. At least on paper. I guess one could believe that White Nationalists are secretly Nazis, but I don't.

To get back on topic, has any new video of the car crash surfaced?

I haven't seen any more, which is kind of surprising, given how many people were there and how many were filming. Perhaps there is more available, but it is being withheld from the media so as not to influence the proceedings.

Or any evidence that this was more than a terrible accident that was triggered by the ANTIFA?

I think the bulk of the evidence so far suggests that this was not just an accident.
 
No, the discussion is the Charlottesville Car Crash Video. But since you asked, Ill try to explain it again from the beginning: people here (and in every media outlet around the world) use White Nationalist, White Supremacist, neo-Nazi, and Nazi interchangeably to describe the protesters at Charlottesville. That's wrong. They're not the same. White Nationalism isn't White supremacism. It's not Nazism. White Nationalism isn't inherently racist. White Nationalism is the moral equivalent of Zionism. Israel isn't perfect but it's existence as a Jewish state is a perfect example of how a people with nationalist aspirations can create a state that protects the interests of an ethnic majority without racism or a belief in their own superiority. People do criticize the state of Israel but nobody says Israel doesn't have a right to exist because ethnic nationalism is abhorrent immoral and racist and Jews who support Israel are dangerous Judeosupremacists who deserve to be punched.

You can be for or against nationalism in principle but you can't be selective about it.

If that doesn't help we can continue this conversation in another thread. To get back on topic, has any new video of the car crash surfaced? Or any evidence that this was more than a terrible accident that was triggered by the ANTIFA?

Presumably under White Nationalism,blacks would be separate but equal?


Why could anyone think that is racist?

Just as the people in my class at school who said that they "weren't racist but were racialist" (which seemed to be racism in a suit).
 
Presumably under White Nationalism,blacks would be separate but equal?


Why could anyone think that is racist?

Just as the people in my class at school who said that they "weren't racist but were racialist" (which seemed to be racism in a suit).

Presumably blacks should live in the black ethnostate.

Also, if they stayed, the would be treated worse because the primary purpose of the state would be to advance white interests. By that isn't racism because there is nothing stating it should be advanced because White people are superior.
 
Presumably blacks should live in the black ethnostate.

Also, if they stayed, the would be treated worse because the primary purpose of the state would be to advance white interests. By that isn't racism because there is nothing stating it should be advanced because White people are superior.

In theory it's just a hateful ideology, that prevents free movement of citizens and free association of citizens.

In practice, the white nationalists would want the best bits for themselves.
 
Presumably under White Nationalism,blacks would be separate but equal?

Why could anyone think that is racist?

Just as the people in my class at school who said that they "weren't racist but were racialist" (which seemed to be racism in a suit).

This is a problem caused by the whole "racism is a hatred, in your 'heart'" idea. White supremacy in the US wasn't about hatred, it was about money. Slavery turned into wealthy landowners finding the cheapest possible labor. Jim Crow stuck black people, who paid the same taxes or more, receiving far worse public facilities. Things like the New Deal required black people to pay in, but gave the benefits to white people - which makes it hilarious that many white people now demand that black people "pull themselves up by their bootstraps", as MLK Jr. noted.

This seems obvious, but white nationalism, in the US, would require nonwhite people to give up property, and possibly to be considered property, to be given to what would inevitably be the wealthiest white people. This is no different than slavery or Jim Crow, monetarily.

Now, the ethnic cleansing portion adds a specific crime against humanity to the above. But then again, we've seen people rage against black people when someone gets above "his station." In fact, in the US, it's almost inevitable.

Funny thing is, this was predicted. It happens whenever black people advance too far, when someone rises above his or her station while being black. In this case, the black guy who rose "above his station" was Barack Obama. The backlash, and hilariously the man who clearly demonstrates every old black American saying about how much easier it is to be white? Donald Trump, the most laughably inept president in...um...I really don't know how far back.

But as I said, we've seen it all before. Every black person I know, and most people from other minority groups as will, got ready. It's the majority of white people that either voted for Toupee Fiasco, or who insisted that he and Hillary were "the same", that will have to learn the hard way.

(My position on the central subject is unchanged, this is a clear-cut terrorist attack, perpetrated by an angry young man who was indoctrinated via the Internet, no different than any similar attack in Europe by an ISIS sympathiser. Just thought I'd throw that in)
 
Last edited:
No, the discussion is the Charlottesville Car Crash Video. But since you asked, Ill try to explain it again from the beginning: people here (and in every media outlet around the world) use White Nationalist, White Supremacist, neo-Nazi, and Nazi interchangeably to describe the protesters at Charlottesville. That's wrong. They're not the same.

Marches with Nazis = Nazi.
 
If that doesn't help we can continue this conversation in another thread. To get back on topic, has any new video of the car crash surfaced? Or any evidence that this was more than a terrible accident that was triggered by the ANTIFA?

Yeah, it's being kept in a vault in Area 51 along with the missing footage from the Zapruder film where it can clearly be seen that Jackie fired first. Lee Harvey was defending himself, man!
 

Back
Top Bottom