Minoosh
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Jul 15, 2011
- Messages
- 12,901
Link?BTW see UV Alumni Tina Fey's sheet cake routine last night?
Link?BTW see UV Alumni Tina Fey's sheet cake routine last night?
So when Antifa sees that Black Bloc is marching with them, shouldn't they just go home? No fine person would march with Black Bloc, right?
Have you been reading antifa literature?True. There's an overlap. But Antifa isn't the Black Bloc, and the Black Bloc isn't Antifa.
There was no text linking the two. In context I imagine many people assumed the photos were taken Saturday in Charlottesville, but there was no explicit claim.I saw nothing in the description of the meme that identified the hammer-and-sicle side as Antifa?
Noam Chomsky recently made some comments about antifa, and militant anti-fascism in general, which were as ill-timed as they were ill-informed. Here's what we think he's got wrong about the subject.
Have you been reading antifa literature?
I've heard this trick 100 times. It's linguistically incorrect attempt to try to polish a turd.
Sent from my SM-J327P using Tapatalk
You are drawing a parallel to non-nazis marching with nazis, right?
The comparison only fits almost.
It's a question of what the rally is originally: If you go to a rally and find out it is organized, invited to and has a motto, symbols, slogans and mostly marchers that can be directly identified as militant, such that the rally actually IS a militants' march, walk away, do not participate (and blame yourself for not checking earlier what you were going to).If you have a protest organized and attended by a broad spectrum of peaceful groups and local citizenry, and some militants also show up, keep a distance to the militants, but otherwise keep rallying.
It would be defeatist if you allowed militant minority to end the good protest.
(And yes, there would be a gray area. Just do what you can to discourage militants - especially on your own side. And don't mingle.)
So if an antifa uses black bloc tactics, the disapproval gets credited to "the Black Bloc" who I have yet to ever hear anyone identify themselves as?No, it's stating reality, and no I haven't. I consider myself anti-Fascist, but I have never participated in Antifa activities. I have friends who have, though.
The Black Bloc consist of Anarchists who want to destroy privately owned property and have an anti-globalist as well as an anti-fascist agenda. We see Black Blocs in demonstrations with that kind of focus. But to assert that they are representative of Antifa is just wrong.
These guys are Antifa.
So if an antifa uses black bloc tactics, the disapproval gets credited to "the Black Bloc" who I have yet to ever hear anyone identify themselves as?
While everyone I've ever seen use that tactic has preferred the term anarchist or antifa?
It is the same picture.
Anarchist is not the same as Antifa either.
If Antifa uses Black Bloc tactics, I would condemn those people. Not Antifa, but those people. The Black Bloc hide their faces from authorities in order to avoid prosecution for destroying private property and clashing with police. I have experience being on the receiving end of their shenanigans, standing with other LEAs to protect property. They do not represent Antifa. They are thugs.
Fail equivalence fails. Come back after the Black Bloc has murdered 6 million Jews.
Hence my clever use of the word "or."
Funny how you find nuance where you want and refuse it when you don't.
Sent from my SM-J327P using Tapatalk
Anyone who calls himself Antifa should renounce violence in a heartbeat if there were no more Fascists tomorrow.
The equivalence is dependent on how many Jews a group has murdered*? I don't think so. The equivalence is dependent on how "bad" a group is. If Black Bloc is "bad," then the equivalence is valid.
You would agree that if I am attending an anti-illegal immigration rally and the Nazis show up to rally with me, I should just go home, yes? Likewise, when Antifa is counter-protesting, they oughta skedaddle when Black Bloc shows up.
*And let's not forget that that the American wanna-be Nazis are not actually a continuation of the German Nazi Party -as much as they wish it were so.
Is that why they rioted at Berkely to stop Milo from speaking? Does their definition of Fascist extend to self-promoters who dress up mainstream rightwing talking points as edgy?