• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

CNN Doxxes a gif maker

Racist and antisemitic hatemongers get all butthurt over the possibility that their violent manchild fantasies could get exposed for all to see. Meanwhile one of the journalists who exposed HanAssholeSolo's anti-semitic reedit posts has far more courage and integrity than "alt-right" retards ever have:

My reporting on the Stars of David meme quickly went viral. At this moment it’s been shared more than 14,000 times by the likes of CNN’s own Jake Tapper and MSNBC’s Joe Scarborough, who’s had his own run-ins with the president as of late. In the past, when a post or story of mine has garnered that much attention, I’ve always dealt with the inevitable criticism and harassment that follows. Sure enough, it wasn’t far behind.

Before the hour was up, I was receiving messages from the usual customers: anonymous accounts with Pepe avatars and bios declaring themselves “ethnonationalists” and “white identitarians.” Despite my Southern Baptist upbringing, they assumed I was Jewish because I’d uncovered anti-Semitism, and so the threats and memes predictably featured pictures of Adolf Hitler, scenes from the Holocaust and other anti-Semitic garbage. I was peppered with the usual slurs and insults before a user calling his or herself “Pepe’s Imam” told me: “There’s a civil war coming, leftist. Memes are the least of your problems.”

...

I learned last year the best strategy is to be open about this kind of stuff and expose it however possible. On my Twitter feed I prepared screenshots of the offending rhetoric while critics accused me of lying. The left is the violent group, they told me while linking to stories about clashes with antifascist groups. In the same thread, as they claimed I’d made the whole thing up, the anti-Semitic materials and threats were piling up.

...


While Neo-Nazis and 9/11 Truthers sent more memes and threats, people kept talking about the original GIF that’d started the whole mess. Wrestling is fake, they said. A choreographed fight that’s nothing more than some harmless fun.

I kept thinking about HanAssholeSolo’s posting record. His rampant use of racial slurs. His talk of wanting all Muslims eliminated. The CNN meme with the Stars of David. That wrestling GIF that, upon first glance, might appear to be tongue-in-cheek, but, with closer inspection, hides something much, much darker.

HanAssholeSolo has apologized, and vowed never to post that kind of hateful rhetoric again. But as I discovered, there are thousands more like him—and they’re not sorry.

http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/07/06/hanassholesolo-anti-semitic-posts-215344

CNN should've defintively have outed him just to show off how easily pathetic individuals who spew hatred online, thinking they can't be held accountable, can actually suffer consequences.
 
Last edited:
As such, until he "runs for public office" or the like, there is no public interest

My opinion is that CNN is a *********** dumpster fire. I was also repeating the opinions of a broad swath of journalists that CNN acted incredibly unethically while also explaining it to you, i.e. the farcical assertion that CNN withheld it for his safety while also reserving their rights to ignore that if they so chose. I assume you at least understand how slimy that is?

Nope, I don't understand. That is why I'm asking. I need you to break it down.
 
As such, until he "runs for public office" or the like, there is no public interest

My opinion is that CNN is a *********** dumpster fire. I was also repeating the opinions of a broad swath of journalists that CNN acted incredibly unethically while also explaining it to you, i.e. the farcical assertion that CNN withheld it for his safety while also reserving their rights to ignore that if they so chose. I assume you at least understand how slimy that is?

So why did you lie in the thread title?
 
I do think that CNN is not a good news site and that is why I have not watched it for many years now.

However, CNN is certainly not a fake news site either.

After all, if CNN was a source of fake news, then such a thing would be quite obvious and quite easy to demonstrate and thus far, no such demonstration has been done.

And furthermore, if some people are really so ticked about CNN, then the best thing for them to do is simply stop watching CNN and get on with their lives.

I disagree. I don't have CNN, but I do read news on their website. Long, well written articles with lots of journalistic integrity and talent.
 
That doesn't change the fact that it was a question I genuinely wanted to see answered

Perhaps you did, but you still asked it in an obviously provocative way, and then acted surprised when it provoked. You shouldn't have been surprised by the reaction.
 
Racist and antisemitic hatemongers get all butthurt over the possibility that their violent manchild fantasies could get exposed for all to see. Meanwhile one of the journalists who exposed HanAssholeSolo's anti-semitic reedit posts has far more courage and integrity than "alt-right" retards ever have:



http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/07/06/hanassholesolo-anti-semitic-posts-215344

CNN should've defintively have outed him just to show off how easily pathetic individuals who spew hatred online, thinking they can't be held accountable, can actually suffer consequences.

what is ironic is that there is absolutely zero news value in his anti-semetic posts and the ONLY reason to bring them up is to threaten the guy.

CNN, a flat out pack of scum bags.
 
Nope, I don't understand. That is why I'm asking. I need you to break it down.

Oh dear, I frankly expect a minimum level of erudition with the principles involved and I explained it as far as I am willing to, perhaps you will wish to read some of the numerous articles on the internet about it?

Good luck!
 
I disagree. I don't have CNN, but I do read news on their website. Long, well written articles with lots of journalistic integrity and talent.

Thanks much.

I will try reading their articles for a while and see how that works out.
 
Oh dear, I frankly expect a minimum level of erudition with the principles involved and I explained it as far as I am willing to, perhaps you will wish to read some of the numerous articles on the internet about it?

Good luck!

I'm asking you specifically to address those principles. If you don't wish, that is fine. But your assumption that someone won't ask you about principles is ridiculous.
 
what is ironic is that there is absolutely zero news value in his anti-semetic posts and the ONLY reason to bring them up is to threaten the guy.

Yeah because Trump retweeting a anti-CNN gif coming from someone spewing racist and antisemeitic hatred online is not noteworthy at all. I mean it's just harmless fun by some harmless excited Trump supporter and not just another example of the extremely pent up rage and hatred coming from incapable Trump supporters trying to work each-other up to murder journalists and other "shitlibs".

CNN, a flat out pack of scum bags.

Foaming at mouth crazy...
 
Last edited:
what is ironic is that there is absolutely zero news value in his anti-semetic posts and the ONLY reason to bring them up is to threaten the guy.
Trump has echoed alt-reich nutjobs on multiple occasions (including fake data that he never retracted) and it's in the public interest to know about it.

"Zero news value"? Nonsense.
 
Yeah because Trump retweeting a anti-CNN gif

Trump did not "retweet" anything and CERTAINLY nothing produced by the individual in question.

We expect a minimum of knowledge of the facts and thus kindly ask that you not repeat #FAKENEWS lies such as the above.

The less said about the remainder of your post, the better.
 
Trump has echoed alt-reich nutjobs on multiple occasions (including fake data that he never retracted) and it's in the public interest to know about it.

"Zero news value"? Nonsense.

Well that does not apply here, and moreover that could be easily accomplished (had he done so, which he did) by referring the reader to the other posts made under the same handle, would it not?

Of course it would. CNN decided not to do that here and is no festering in their own tub of self righteous slime.
 
Well that does not apply here, and moreover that could be easily accomplished (had he done so, which he did) by referring the reader to the other posts made under the same handle, would it not?

Of course it would. CNN decided not to do that here and is no festering in their own tub of self righteous slime.
Of course this is BS of the highest order -- a bare naked semantic dodge. Highly unimpressive.
 
Trump did not "retweet" anything and CERTAINLY nothing produced by the individual in question.

We expect a minimum of knowledge of the facts and thus kindly ask that you not repeat #FAKENEWS lies such as the above.

The less said about the remainder of your post, the better.

Isn't all this just nitpicking? Yes, he didn't "re"-tweet it. Ok, we get it. He did post it though, didn't he?

there is absolutely zero news value in his anti-semetic posts

Fascinating.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom