Its incoherent because you can't understand unless someone spells it out for you. My point was an immigrant could conceivably get into a country by claiming racism? Maybe a stretch but since your side worships the UN democrats might let them decide our immigration law.
The charter wasn't binding law. It was a declaration of human rights from which a general usage was used. A resolution. Again, rejecting bias in public policy does not obligate one to open borders.
This is such a strange leap of reasoning.
So which is it? Racism or a fake issue to drum up votes?
Both. Racists find ignorant fear-mongering about Mexicans and Muslims very compelling. Cynical politicians realize this (and a lot of them believe it). Thus, a fake issue is brought to the fore, and it's only the racist nature of the issue that draws people in. There is no substantive issue of any major concern.
Because I don't see the secure borders side talking about race.
That's because you engage in a silly combination of:
1) Pretending that calling people "Mexicans" and spitting bigoted venom at someone for their nation of origin allows escape of the term "racist." This is ether not true or unimportant, depending on the definition of racism being used.
2) Thinking obvious dog-whistling fools anyone.
3) Thinking you can, mid-stream, change your religious ban into "extreme vetting" and thinking that fools anyone, and
4) Just denying the obvious. Again, not fooling anyone.
Besides your side would be the ones to benefit from votes from poor third world country people.
Which is why you and your racist friends spend so much effort trying to deny them entrance despite the clear benefits.
The fantasy land you live in is astounding
Did it ever occur to you that these working class poor compete directly with illegal aliens? Can they be for secure borders without gaining the racist tag from you? Does it always have to be such a decisive issue with the paid Libs on here?
I'm sure some of them are just swayed by the eager racists. Practically speaking, being ignorant of the actual facts is not fundamentally different from expressing gross bias towards brown people from various parts of the world. Perhaps they're more likely to eventually adopt a more humane and reasonable outlook, but they throw their support behind the racists, so I don't buy the poor, sad, white snowflake routine. The information is available.
We've gone over this a thousands times. The economic studies show that the presence of immigrants have a mild downward impact on the income of people who haven't graduated from high school. Everyone else experiences an increase in salary due to the economic activity generated.
That mild downward effect could be recovered in a number of ways. It's not a big number.
There is no serious issue, just ignorant fear mongering.
