He's undoubtedly signed some sort of NDA. Trump is big on those, including on his ex-wives.
I could see a publisher wanting to go to court on that. It may even be worth it.
He's undoubtedly signed some sort of NDA. Trump is big on those, including on his ex-wives.
There's no 'maybe'. She was lying. That's her job and she's really not very good at it.
Its quite clear she made a mistake, it couldn't be more obvious. Your side can't even be honest about it.
Its quite clear she made a mistake, it couldn't be more obvious. Your side can't even be honest about it.
I could see a publisher wanting to go to court on that. It may even be worth it.
I doubt he could force a government employee to sign an NDA, or that it would be enforceable anyway. It's not his private business, they all work for the US, not Donald Trump.
NDA are rather notorious for being unenforceable anyway. Which is why most companies do not bother with them anyway.
I think you're thinking of a non-compete, those are often unenforceable in the US.
Non-disclosure agreements are enforceable and are used all the time when companies do business with one another.
IANAL, but as far as an NDA for a person working for the US government, I don't know how that could work. Unless it is deemed national security, I don't think the government could prevent anyone from writing a kiss-and-tell.
There's going to be lots of folks fired but it's going to be Obama holdovers.![]()
All you need to do to overcome a NDA is to offer to pay the settlement cost for the NDA violation.
For a sufficiently juicy scoop, it would easily be worth it.
No, if there is an enforceable NDA a court would grant an injunction. I don't think DJT will be settling. So, the legal angle would be to attack the enforceability of the NDA. As someone else mentioned it may be a legal tangle considering that he is a federal employee.
So Trump declares all personal interactions with him top secret. Easy and far better than a measly NDA.
Would be, but I have gotten the impression over the years that government labels relating to confidential information are very structured.
That was before Trump. He won, so whatever he says goes.
Its quite clear she made a mistake, it couldn't be more obvious. Your side can't even be honest about it.
Indeed, she clearly meant to say that "they were the terrorists behind the Bowling Green Terrorists".....![]()
![]()