Hillary Clinton is Done: part 4

Status
Not open for further replies.
Let TBD enjoy himself, he's not going to have internet access from his cell at Gitmo after Clinton starts the purge...
 
why believe your lying eyes when you can turn to reputable "journalists" like CNN for the "news." they should be getting their marching orders shortly from the Campaign. Then you will know what to believe.

:thumbsup:

I know reality is a burden for you, but it seems virtually all of the bombshells wiki has provided us has turned into a giant nothing burger.

What makes this any different?
 
Does that mean Hillary Clinton is headed for Sainthood? Seems odd for the pope to canonize a Methodist.

No, but TBD will feel the hand of Jesus as the pain of seeing Hillary sworn in. Assuming he sobers up by January.
 
Well as a UK citizen I had to settle for a few postal votes using dead people's names. Ronald Reagan, Abraham Lincoln and George Washington all voting for Clinton won't raise any suspicions right?
A lot of black people are named Washington, so Donald will probably challenge at least that one.
 
I recommend against opening any attachments on wikileaks. Actually even going to the site is risky. Who knows what kind of malware Julian Assange is installing on your computer.

ETA: I just cleared all history but I don't know if that helps.

lol!

Let the heroes at CNN take that risk on your behalf, they'll give you the straight skinny for sure.

Totally co-opted for the Clinton Crime Family.
 
lol!

Let the heroes at CNN take that risk on your behalf, they'll give you the straight skinny for sure.

Totally co-opted for the Clinton Crime Family.

Foreign-owned media outlets like Fox are more believable because ... because what?

Does anyone here know how many times Assange has stolen Trump's emails? Or the RNC's? Is there a pattern regarding who he targets?

ETA: I would look at WikiLeaks on a hard copy or public computer, but going to Assange's site now strikes me as imprudent.
 
Last edited:
Foreign-owned media outlets like Fox are more believable because ... because what?

Does anyone here know how many times Assange has stolen Trump's emails? Or the RNC's?

ETA: I would look at WikiLeaks on a hard copy or public computer, but going to Assange's site now strikes me as imprudent.

Technically, Fox is not foreign owned....Rupert is a American Citizen....for business reasons.
 
Foreign-owned media outlets like Fox are more believable because ... because what?

Does anyone here know how many times Assange has stolen Trump's emails? Or the RNC's? Is there a pattern regarding who he targets?

ETA: I would look at WikiLeaks on a hard copy or public computer, but going to Assange's site now strikes me as imprudent.

Absolute rock bottom proof of several CNN and CNBC "journalists" colluding with Hillary's campaign, and you bring up Fox.

Oh dear.....
 
Did Nate make a final prediction?
I ask because only once...right after the GOP convention....did Silver have Trump as even with Hillary,,,and that did not last long.

I think it is pending on Kelly Ayotte's and Roy Blunt's shifting in the wind.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom