Hillary Clinton is Done: part 4

Status
Not open for further replies.
I forgot to mention that I stole ballots from about 50 of my neighbors and voted for Hillary on their behalf. Just doing my part.
 
Well as a UK citizen I had to settle for a few postal votes using dead people's names. Ronald Reagan, Abraham Lincoln and George Washington all voting for Clinton won't raise any suspicions right?
 
I've been coordinating voter assistants letting people know that if they think Hillary should be in jail they need to put a tick against her name.
 
Just saw "reporting" on the Chelsea Clinton wedding email. How about we wait a couple days, let a journalist actually confirm if the money was used that way. Then report it?

Wait, no? We are just going to report the email like it is news itself? Well okay then.
 
Just saw "reporting" on the Chelsea Clinton wedding email. How about we wait a couple days, let a journalist actually confirm if the money was used that way. Then report it?

Wait, no? We are just going to report the email like it is news itself? Well okay then.

why believe your lying eyes when you can turn to reputable "journalists" like CNN for the "news." they should be getting their marching orders shortly from the Campaign. Then you will know what to believe.

:thumbsup:
 
why believe your lying eyes when you can turn to reputable "journalists" like CNN for the "news." they should be getting their marching orders shortly from the Campaign. Then you will know what to believe.

:thumbsup:

Or maybe the "New" journalists like Huff Po?

I spoke w Arianna abt PMUSA Board and will send her more info. She is enthusiastic abt the project but asks if she's more useful to us not being on the Board and, instead, using Huffpo to echo our message without any perceived conflicts.

Trust the Press! Trust Hillary!
 
why believe your lying eyes when you can turn to reputable "journalists" like CNN for the "news." they should be getting their marching orders shortly from the Campaign. Then you will know what to believe.

:thumbsup:

"Clinton staffer says Chelsea used charity funds for wedding in private email"

"Chelsea used charity funds for wedding"

The former is not worthy of being a news story. It is a good clue to try and run down leads to write the latter.
 
If the CF is just a huge slush fund why would there be an internal investigation anyway?
 
"Clinton staffer says Chelsea used charity funds for wedding in private email"

"Chelsea used charity funds for wedding"

The former is not worthy of being a news story. It is a good clue to try and run down leads to write the latter.

Wait Doug Band saying that Chelsea used funds for her wedding is a nonstory, and you think it prudent to wait until CNN, or HuffPo, or CNBC tells you what to think?

'k.
 
Wait Doug Band saying that Chelsea used funds for her wedding is a nonstory, and you think it prudent to wait until CNN, or HuffPo, or CNBC tells you what to think?

'k.

I'm waiting for a pro like David fahrenthold to do the legwork that is the profession.

Wait, isn't my comment about how reporting an email as is is not journalism an attack on huffpost and CNN that are doing that exact thing?
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom