LSSBB
Devilish Dictionarian
Why didn't you highlight "the investigation into" part of the sentence?
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/49561 , see the attachment.
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/49561 , see the attachment.
How many times are you guys going to vote for Hillary? I already voted for her once. I intend to vote at least 20 more times tomorrow.
Just saw "reporting" on the Chelsea Clinton wedding email. How about we wait a couple days, let a journalist actually confirm if the money was used that way. Then report it?
Wait, no? We are just going to report the email like it is news itself? Well okay then.
why believe your lying eyes when you can turn to reputable "journalists" like CNN for the "news." they should be getting their marching orders shortly from the Campaign. Then you will know what to believe.
![]()
I spoke w Arianna abt PMUSA Board and will send her more info. She is enthusiastic abt the project but asks if she's more useful to us not being on the Board and, instead, using Huffpo to echo our message without any perceived conflicts.
why believe your lying eyes when you can turn to reputable "journalists" like CNN for the "news." they should be getting their marching orders shortly from the Campaign. Then you will know what to believe.
![]()
"Clinton staffer says Chelsea used charity funds for wedding in private email"
"Chelsea used charity funds for wedding"
The former is not worthy of being a news story. It is a good clue to try and run down leads to write the latter.
Wait Doug Band saying that Chelsea used funds for her wedding is a nonstory, and you think it prudent to wait until CNN, or HuffPo, or CNBC tells you what to think?
'k.
I'm waiting for a pro like David fahrenthold to do the legwork that is the profession.
Or maybe the "New" journalists like Huff Po?
Trust the Press! Trust Hillary!