Hillary Clinton is Done: part 4

Status
Not open for further replies.
wareyin said:
Yes, Russia is using wikileaks to make mischief. We are all well aware of that, but thank you for the reminder.
Click to expand...

Oh Gosh, you better tell CNN that, because Donna Brazille isn't working there anymore.

Actual undisputed evidence of Hillary and her gang's sleazy conduct, and your "Russia is gonna get ya" deflection ain't working.
 
The Big Dog said:
Oh Gosh, you better tell CNN that, because Donna Brazille isn't working there anymore.

Actual undisputed evidence of Hillary and her gang's sleazy conduct, and your "Russia is gonna get ya" deflection ain't working.
Click to expand...

Wow, you and your misrepresentations! So cute, but run as usual, so wrong.
 
The Big Dog said:
Oh Gosh, you better tell CNN that, because Donna Brazille isn't working there anymore.

Actual undisputed evidence of Hillary and her gang's sleazy conduct, and your "Russia is gonna get ya" deflection ain't working.
Click to expand...

There is a dispute. How did she get the question? CNN was quick to call her activity wrong without explaining how it was possible she could know a question.
 
BobTheCoward said:
There is a dispute. How did she get the question? CNN was quick to call her activity wrong without explaining how it was possible she could know a question.
Click to expand...

well there is no dispute she sent them to Hillary and her gang, now is there?

I don't really care how many heads roll at CNN, what you should care about is that Hillary's gang had no problem accepting grossly inappropriate leaks.
 
wareyin said:
Like I said, cute, but misrepresenting as usual!
Click to expand...
What are the un misrepresented facts about Donna Brazille and the questions?
Or the email to John Podesta from the DOJ. I saw it was from an unofficial personal email instead of the DOJ but I can't say I trust the source to have the facts or implications straight.
 
The Big Dog said:
well there is no dispute she sent them to Hillary and her gang, now is there?

I don't really care how many heads roll at CNN, what you should care about is that Hillary's gang had no problem accepting grossly inappropriate leaks.
Click to expand...
My thoughts also.

I guess Hillary would say she didn't know about the questions being given she just thought she was being prepped on potential questions.
 
BobTheCoward said:
There is a dispute. How did she get the question?.
Click to expand...

Given that we know that Trump doesn't prepare for debates, it wouldn't surprise me if the answer were as simple as this.

"Why did you give Clinton the questions?"
"She asked."
"Why didn't you give them to Trump?"
"He never asked."
 
The Big Dog said:
well there is no dispute she sent them to Hillary and her gang, now is there?

I don't really care how many heads roll at CNN, what you should care about is that Hillary's gang had no problem accepting grossly inappropriate leaks.
Click to expand...

There is dispute if she sent a question she knew, or she speculated. It doesn't make a huge difference, she shouldn't have communicated, but I really cant even say she leaked a question.

They should have no problem accepting a perfectly legal, unsolicited leak. I don't understand the anger here.
 
pgwenthold said:
Given that we know that Trump doesn't prepare for debates, it wouldn't surprise me if the answer were as simple as this.

"Why did you give Clinton the questions?"
"She asked."
"Why didn't you give them to Trump?"
"He never asked."
Click to expand...

That was a Sanders debate, not a trump debate.
 
BobTheCoward said:
There is dispute if she sent a question she knew, or she speculated. It doesn't make a huge difference, she shouldn't have communicated, but I really cant even say she leaked a question.

They should have no problem accepting a perfectly legal, unsolicited leak. I don't understand the anger here.
Click to expand...

You don't think secretly accepting a question in advance of the debate is wrong?
 
eeyore1954 said:
You don't think secretly accepting a question in advance of the debate is wrong?
Click to expand...

If someone gives it to you, no.

I am semi-serious in my response above. Jeez, if you don't ask for the questions, I think you have failed.
 
eeyore1954 said:
My thoughts also.

I guess Hillary would say she didn't know about the questions being given she just thought she was being prepped on potential questions.
Click to expand...

:id:

You do realize you learned about this through stolen emails?
 
BobTheCoward said:
There is dispute if she sent a question she knew, or she speculated. It doesn't make a huge difference, she shouldn't have communicated, but I really cant even say she leaked a question.

They should have no problem accepting a perfectly legal, unsolicited leak. I don't understand the anger here.
Click to expand...

Me either, she did not leak a 'question."

She leaked several:

http://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/politics/2016/11/01/brazile-flint/93116772/

Perfectly Legal? she was a top person at the DNC at the time. It was Perfectly Unethical at the least
 
BobTheCoward said:
That same article has CNN stating brazile didn't have any of that information to leak.

How is it unethical?
Click to expand...

No it did not, it says that CNN claims that CCN did not give them to her.

She clearly got them and clearly gave them to Hillary.

Disgraceful
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom