Hillary Clinton is Done: part 4

Status
Not open for further replies.
No it did not, it says that CNN claims that CCN did not give them to her.

She clearly got them and clearly gave them to Hillary.

Disgraceful

It isnt clear she got them. She could have guessed based on speaking to the town hall person directly. I am really curious. I think it is the most interesting part about this.

Wait. Go back to what I wrote. You said,"no it did not" and then proceeded to write almost exactly what we said. I think my interpretation was correct.
 
Last edited:
What are the un misrepresented facts about Donna Brazille and the questions?
Or the email to John Podesta from the DOJ. I saw it was from an unofficial personal email instead of the DOJ but I can't say I trust the source to have the facts or implications straight.

Let me ask you this: Did you watch the debate that The Big Dog is pretending is a big deal right now? Do you think the Big Dog did?

I'm pretty sure that The Big Dog is running with this Russian mischief junk solely because TBD thinks this will hurt Clinton, but honestly, nobody but Republicans and Russians care.
 
This just in! Trump found to be 27% more disgusting than Hillary among likely voters!

Trump was found to be disgusting when he says "disgusting" or "Hillary" folllwed by any words.

Mainly Republicans found Hillary disgusting because "she just can't be trusted."
 
Let me ask you this: Did you watch the debate that The Big Dog is pretending is a big deal right now? Do you think the Big Dog did?

I'm pretty sure that The Big Dog is running with this Russian mischief junk solely because TBD thinks this will hurt Clinton, but honestly, nobody but Republicans and Russians care.

No I didn't watch the debate. But someone thought it was important enough to leak the question. I don't see how this makes what he/she said a misrepresentation.
 
This just in! Trump found to be 27% more disgusting than Hillary among likely voters!

Trump was found to be disgusting when he says "disgusting" or "Hillary" folllwed by any words.

Mainly Republicans found Hillary disgusting because "she just can't be trusted."

Personally I distrust them both.
 
From the latest bunch of Podesta mails, released today, showing the thought process of that bunch of crooks. Subject "Deutsche Bank":

dschwerin@hillaryclinton.com said:
Following up on the conversation this morning about needing more arrows in
our quiver on Wall Street, I wanted to float one idea. In October 2014,
HRC did a paid speech in NYC for Deutsche Bank. I wrote her a long riff
about economic fairness and how the financial industry has lost its way,
precisely for the purpose of having something we could show people if ever asked what she was saying behind closed doors for two years to all those fat cats. It's definitely not as tough or pointed as we would write it
now, but it's much more than most people would assume she was saying in
paid speeches. (Full transcript is attached and key riff is pasted below.)
Perhaps at some point there will be value in sharing this with a reporter
and getting a story written. Upside would be that when people say she's too
close to Wall Street and has taken too much money from bankers, we can
point to evidence that she wasn't afraid to speak truth to power. Downside
would be that we could then be pushed to release transcripts from all her
paid speeches, which would be less helpful (although probably not
disastrous). In the end, I'm not sure this is worth doing, but wanted to
flag it so you know it's out there.
 
No I didn't watch the debate. But someone thought it was important enough to leak the question. I don't see how this makes what he/she said a misrepresentation.

Actually, all we know is that "someone" (cough, Russia, cough) thought it was important to leak an email that implies Brazile gave Clinton information that Brazile didn't actually have. Right now, we don't know how accurate that email is (whether wikileaks or Russia altered it before leaking it), and that "leaked" question didn't alter the result of the primary in any way. But, the Big Dog is misrepresenting it to be "uncontesteddisputed evidence" of cheating, even if he is only fooling those who would never have voted for Sanders or Clinton anyway.
 
Last edited:
It isnt clear she got them. She could have guessed based on speaking to the town hall person directly. I am really curious. I think it is the most interesting part about this.

Wait. Go back to what I wrote. You said,"no it did not" and then proceeded to write almost exactly what we said. I think my interpretation was correct.

Are you speculating now? how silly

Do you not understand the difference between:

"CNN said they did not give them to her" and "CNN stating brazile didn't have any of that information to leak."

Really? Assume she got them from Roland Martin one of the moderators and put your thinking cap on
 
It isnt clear she got them. She could have guessed based on speaking to the town hall person directly. I am really curious. I think it is the most interesting part about this.

Wait. Go back to what I wrote. You said,"no it did not" and then proceeded to write almost exactly what we said. I think my interpretation was correct.

There is a difference between she didn't get it from us and she didn't have it.
 
well there is no dispute she sent them to Hillary and her gang, now is there?

I don't really care how many heads roll at CNN, what you should care about is that Hillary's gang had no problem accepting grossly inappropriate leaks.
I call BS. I don't believe you would expect Trump or his campaign to refuse similar information if it were offered to them. Also, that the Clinton campaign received a leak doesn't change that the information was discovered by Russian hackers before being leaked to wikileaks.
 
There is a difference between she didn't get it from us and she didn't have it.

How much ownership is CNN implying they had over the debate? Whose signature is on the moderator's check?

As I said, this it the most interesting part of the topic.
 
No I didn't watch the debate. But someone thought it was important enough to leak the question. I don't see how this makes what he/she said a misrepresentation.

Oh and the Sanders supporters of course care that a top official in the DNC leaked the Clinton camp debate emails.
 
I call BS. I don't believe you would expect Trump or his campaign to refuse similar information if it were offered to them. Also, that the Clinton campaign received a leak doesn't change that the information was discovered by Russian hackers before being leaked to wikileaks.

Explain exactly how all that nonsense you just wrote deals with the DNC and the Clinton campaign conspiring to screw Bernie Sanders at the Town Hall Debate?
 
There is a difference between she didn't get it from us and she didn't have it.

Yeah, because who would have expected a question about the water in flint Michigan. Thank god she got the heads up, or else she would have been really unprepared. :rolleyes:

ETA:
The email, originally sent March 5, 2016, warned that “One of the questions directed to HRC tomorrow is from a woman with a rash.”
“Her family has lead poison and she will ask what, if anything, will Hillary do as president to help the ppl of Flint,” Brazile wrote.

During the March 6 debate, Lee-Anne Walters, who said her family was poisoned by lead, asked Clinton and Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders if they would “make a personal promise to me right now.”

“As president, in your first 100 days in office, you will make it a requirement that all public water systems must remove all lead service lines throughout the entire United States, and notification made to the — citizens that have said service lines,” Walters asked.


OMG SHE GOT PREPPED ON A YES/NO QUESTION. :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:

This is the definition of a tempest in a teapot.
 
Last edited:
Simply put. There is nothing wrong with them conspiring.

:eye-poppi

The DNC and the Clinton Campaign against Bernie Sanders?

Are you *********** serious?

That was the same thing that got Debbie Wasserman booted before the convention...

Oh man. Clinton 2016, Slogan: the fix is in
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom