• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Merged Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Pixie of key said:
"Bands of magnetized solar material march toward the sun's equator. The way the bands in each hemisphere interact leads to a 330-day cycle of waxing and waning activity on the sun that can be as strong as the more well-studied 11-year solar cycle. Credit: S. McIntosh"

http://m.phys.org/news/2015-04-sun-seasonal.html

.

Merkurius 88 Day +Venus 224 Day +Earth 365 + Mars 686 Day = 1363 Day

1363 / 4 = 340 Day

I predict. They are going to change that cycle 330 Day and it is 340 Day, you know!

Later More information!

:) ;) :)
Click to expand...


"Cambridge, MA -
In August astronomers announced that the nearby star Proxima Centauri hosts an Earth-sized planet (called Proxima b) in its habitable zone. At first glance, Proxima Centauri seems nothing like our Sun. It's a small, cool, red dwarf star only one-tenth as massive and one-thousandth as luminous as the Sun. However, new research shows that it is sunlike in one surprising way: it has a regular cycle of starspots.

Starspots (like sunspots) are dark blotches on a star's surface where the temperature is a little cooler than the surrounding area. They are driven by magnetic fields. A star is made of ionized gases called plasma. Magnetic fields can restrict the plasma's flow and create spots. Changes to a star's magnetic field can affect the number and distribution of starspots.

Our Sun experiences an 11-year activity cycle. At the solar minimum, the Sun is nearly spot-free. At solar maximum, typically more than 100 sunspots cover less than one percent of the Sun's surface on average."


https://www.cfa.harvard.edu/news/2016-25

I predict it is going to be same cykle for that star, how long time that planet take a one round over star. If there is only one planet!


Sunspot cykle long time checking is going to be 11 years and 315 days, if i remember right way. It is same what Jupiter take a one round with Sun!

Love
1038
:)
 
Pixie of key said:
Hubble detects giant 'cannonballs' shooting from star


http://m.phys.org/news/2016-10-hubble-giant-cannonballs-star.html


"Great balls of fire! NASA's Hubble Space Telescope has detected superhot blobs of gas, each twice as massive as the planet Mars, being ejected near a dying star. The plasma balls are zooming so fast through space it would take only 30 minutes for them to travel from Earth to the moon. This stellar "cannon fire" has continued once every 8.5 years for at least the past 400 years, astronomers estimate."

Well, there is pushing force, of course!

But where is pulling force / curving space now?

Some holiday time for pulling force?

This is same phenomena that Sun spots, Jupiter redspot and hurricanes. I mean how and why this phenomena born.

Love
1038
:)
Click to expand...


"Cambridge, MA -
In August astronomers announced that the nearby star Proxima Centauri hosts an Earth-sized planet (called Proxima b) in its habitable zone. At first glance, Proxima Centauri seems nothing like our Sun. It's a small, cool, red dwarf star only one-tenth as massive and one-thousandth as luminous as the Sun. However, new research shows that it is sunlike in one surprising way: it has a regular cycle of starspots.

Starspots (like sunspots) are dark blotches on a star's surface where the temperature is a little cooler than the surrounding area. They are driven by magnetic fields. A star is made of ionized gases called plasma. Magnetic fields can restrict the plasma's flow and create spots. Changes to a star's magnetic field can affect the number and distribution of starspots.

Our Sun experiences an 11-year activity cycle. At the solar minimum, the Sun is nearly spot-free. At solar maximum, typically more than 100 sunspots cover less than one percent of the Sun's surface on average."

https://www.cfa.harvard.edu/news/2016-25


Also this is same phenomena! So, that planet working with that star abd star activitycykle is same what that planet take a one round over star. If there is only one planet!

You remember, movement / energy from planet deep inside star and there expanding material start expanding faster etc.

And there is expanding movement / energy from galaxy centre supermassive concentration also, you know!

Love
1038
:)
 
Pixie of key fantasizes about science - item 115

Pixie of key said:
"Cambridge, MA -
In August astronomers announced that the nearby star Proxima Centauri hosts an Earth-sized planet (called Proxima b) in its habitable zone. At first glance, Proxima Centauri seems nothing like our Sun. It's a small, cool, red dwarf star only one-tenth as massive and one-thousandth as luminous as the Sun. However, new research shows that it is sunlike in one surprising way: it has a regular cycle of starspots.

Starspots (like sunspots) are dark blotches on a star's surface where the temperature is a little cooler than the surrounding area. They are driven by magnetic fields. A star is made of ionized gases called plasma. Magnetic fields can restrict the plasma's flow and create spots. Changes to a star's magnetic field can affect the number and distribution of starspots.

Our Sun experiences an 11-year activity cycle. At the solar minimum, the Sun is nearly spot-free. At solar maximum, typically more than 100 sunspots cover less than one percent of the Sun's surface on average."


https://www.cfa.harvard.edu/news/2016-25
Click to expand...
Ignorant delusion from a Finnish physics crackpot with no known mathematical ability, little knowledge of physics shown, lots of hand waving and some primitive videos will never match the real world, Pixie of key.

The science is the Sun experiences seasonal changes, new research finds over a cycle of nearly two years and "driven by changes in the bands of strong magnetic fields in each solar hemisphere".

The ignorance is
  1. Adding up the days in the orbits of Mercury, Venus, Earth and Mars as if they were the only planets in the Solar System. Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune exist :eek:!
  2. Dividing by 4 to get the wrong number of 340 instead of nearly two years!
  3. Thinking tat the universe will obey your delusions.
 
Last edited:
Pixie of key fantasizes about science - item 116

Pixie of key said:
In August astronomers announced that the nearby star Proxima Centauri hosts an Earth-sized planet (called Proxima b) in its habitable zone. At first glance, Proxima Centauri seems nothing like our Sun. It's a small, cool, red dwarf star only one-tenth as massive and one-thousandth as luminous as the Sun. However, new research shows that it is sunlike in one surprising way: it has a regular cycle of starspots.

Starspots (like sunspots) are dark blotches on a star's surface where the temperature is a little cooler than the surrounding area. They are driven by magnetic fields. A star is made of ionized gases called plasma. Magnetic fields can restrict the plasma's flow and create spots. Changes to a star's magnetic field can affect the number and distribution of starspots.

Our Sun experiences an 11-year activity cycle. At the solar minimum, the Sun is nearly spot-free. At solar maximum, typically more than 100 sunspots cover less than one percent of the Sun's surface on average."

https://www.cfa.harvard.edu/news/2016-25
Click to expand...
A lie from a Finnish physics crackpot with no known mathematical ability, little knowledge of physics shown, lots of hand waving and some primitive videos.

This discovery is that Proxima Centauri has a dramatic solar cycle of about 7 years and a planet Proxima Centauri b with an orbital period of 11 days.
This is not "that planet working with that star abd star activitycykle is same what that planet take a one round over star".
 
Last edited:
"This discovery is that Proxima Centauri has a dramatic solar cycle of about 7 years and a planet Proxima Centauri b with an orbital period of 11 days."

Very very good!!!

So, I predict, there is bigger planet whith an orbital period of seven years.


And also they can found star activity with that planet which orbit one round in 11 days.


Sun activity is 11 years and 315 days for thousands years checking.

Your remember Maunder minimum and some other minimum.

And Sun short activity is 340 days, not 330 days, like they say.


Rakkautta
1038
:)
 
Awesome, Fabulous, etc.

language to the English column was in one of the information that the observed planetary circumventing Star 11 per day.

Alright. So I predict that there is an asterisk much bigger satellite with one round will last for 7 years.

I predict a shorter cycle of the sun to settle at 340 days instead of now multiplied by 330 days.

I predict a longer cycle to settle at 11 years and 315 days in the long term, where the minimums are taken into account, such as the Maunder.

And the masses Mars 2 x plasma balls every 8.5 years, then, are the object of the activity of the maximum effect.


Hubble Detects Giant 'Cannonballs' Shooting from Star

https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/2016/hubble-detects-giant-cannonballs-shooting-from-star

Well, if you like to try explain this cannonballs, you maybe need some new dark explaining for that phenomena.

Maybe dark curving space? :D


love
1038
:)
 
Pixie of key fantasizes about science - item 117

Pixie of key said:
...
Hubble Detects Giant 'Cannonballs' Shooting from Star

https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/2016/hubble-detects-giant-cannonballs-shooting-from-star
Click to expand...
Gibberish from a Finnish physics crackpot with no known mathematical ability, little knowledge of physics shown, lots of hand waving and some primitive videos

The lie that these 'Cannonballs' are not explained when a scenario explaining them is in his cited source :jaw-dropp! And a delusion about needing "some new dark".
Hubble Detects Giant 'Cannonballs' Shooting from Star
This four-panel graphic illustrates how the binary-star system V Hydrae is launching balls of plasma into space. Panel 1 shows the two stars orbiting each other. One of the stars is nearing the end of its life and has swelled in size, becoming a red giant. In panel 2, the smaller star's orbit carries the star into the red giant's expanded atmosphere. As the star moves through the atmosphere, it gobbles up material from the red giant, which settles into a disk around the star. The buildup of material reaches a tipping point and is eventually ejected as blobs of hot plasma along the star's spin axis, shown in panel 3. This ejection process is repeated every eight years, the time it takes for the orbiting star to make another pass through the bloated red giant's envelope, shown in panel 4.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
Pixie of key fantasizes about science - item 118

Pixie of key said:
"This discovery is that Proxima Centauri has a dramatic solar cycle of about 7 years and a planet Proxima Centauri b with an orbital period of 11 days."

Very very good!!!
Click to expand...
So you have the delusion that the sunspots on stars are controlled by their planets just as expected from a Finnish physics crackpot with no known mathematical ability, little knowledge of physics shown, lots of hand waving and some primitive videos.
 
Last edited:
Pixie of key fantasizes about science - item 119

Pixie of key said:
Your remember Maunder minimum and some other minimum.
Click to expand...
The delusion that Proxima Centauri is our Sun!
The Maunder Minimum and other solar minima are evidence against a delusion that sunspot numbers on the Sun are controlled by Mercury to Mars because there were no sunspots in periods when planets existed :jaw-dropp!
But that is really a delusion because Jupiter, etc. exist.
 
Last edited:
Pixie of key fantasizes about science - item 121

Pixie of key said:
I predict a longer cycle to settle at 11 years and 315 days in the long term, where the minimums are taken into account, such as the Maunder.
Click to expand...
You have plucked a random number out of thin air and seem to be ignorant of the fact that the Maunder Minimum lasted 70 years and was one of about 20 Grand Minima :eye-poppi!
 
Hubble Detects Giant 'Cannonballs' Shooting from Star

https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/2016/hubble-detects-giant-cannonballs-shooting-from-star/

Well, if you like to try explain this cannonballs, you are going to need some new dark explaining for that phenomena!

Maybe dark curving space?


really those 2 x Mars masses of plasma balls of the same as the Sunspots!

star is the object and the second center of the galaxy's supermassive star and in the range where expanding movement / energy center of the galaxy, and another star to crash into the center and get out there to be an expanding matter to expand explosively, and it starts to protrude at an accelerated towards the rapidly expanding star surface and out of the planet's masses plasmaballs.

Love
1038
:)
 
The Sun's coronal tail wags its photospheric dog

http://m.phys.org/news/2016-10-sun-coronal-tail-wags-photospheric.html

"We used to think that the surface's magnetic evolution drives solar eruptions. Our new observations suggest that disturbances created in the solar outer atmosphere can also cause direct and significant perturbations on the surface through magnetic fields, a phenomenon not envisioned by any major contemporary solar eruption models. This has immediate and far-reaching implications in understanding energy and momentum transportation in eruptions on the Sun and other stars," Wang said. "We will continue to study, and possibly re-interpret, the relationship between the different layers of the Sun."


Hello cardboard, wake up !!!

Protruding deep into the Sun in an expanding business / energy may be expanding solar material to expand explosively and it is going to be pushed towards the surface of the sun on a hot and a bit dense. The pace is accelerating and it has time to cool down before the surface, condenses the magnetic substance that causes the sun Comma!

Love
1038
:)
 
"But a team of NJIT scientists now claims that flares in turn have a powerful impact on sunspots, the visible concentrations of magnetic fields on the sun's surface, or photosphere. In a paper published in Nature Communications this week, the researchers argue that flares cause sunspots to rotate at much faster speeds than are usually observed before they erupt.

Their observations, based on high-resolution images captured through NJIT's 1.6 meter New Solar Telescope (NST) at Big Bear Solar Observatory (BBSO), come as something of a surprise. The sun's outer layer, or corona, where flares are released, has a plasma density about a hundred million times smaller than that of the photosphere.

"It's analogous to the tail wagging the dog. The lower-density regions are much less energetic and forceful," said Chang Liu, a research professor of physics at NJIT and the principal author of the study, "Flare differentially rotates sunspot on Sun's surface."

"We do think the rotation of sunspots builds up magnetic energy that is released in form of solar flares, but we have also observed conclusively that flares can cause sunspots to rotate about 10 times faster," he added. "This highlights the powerful, magnetic nature of solar flares.""


It is deep inside the Sun strongly a less dense material for the expanded material from penetrating into the surface of the Sun, engaging / pushing According to the Sun surface layers of materials, resulting in a "hurricane" eye that rotates the faster, the faster the rate of material is ejected from the Sun.

That is just the other way around as the types of claims !!

No magnetic fields causes sunspots!

Protruding from the surface of the material itself is magnetic!

And out of the extracting agent receives from the outside anymore comma run faster.

Rotation speeds up all by itself, depending on how quickly the substance is pushed to the surface from deep inside the sun!

love
1038
:)
 
Last edited:
The Man said:
Pixie of key, have you tried that rope experiment yet?


If not, why not?


If so, why haven't you reported what you found?
Click to expand...


I found the suction cup phenomenon. expanding solid internally does not occur any more space than normal.

is it not use the suction cup to any binding force, and the still caught in the object protrudes from the suction cup to where the stick is pushed.

Love
1038
:)
 
Pixie of key said:
I found the suction cup phenomenon. expanding solid internally does not occur any more space than normal.

is it not use the suction cup to any binding force, and the still caught in the object protrudes from the suction cup to where the stick is pushed.

Love
1038
:)
Click to expand...

Suction cup? Stick? What the heck are you talking about?

So apparently you haven't tried that rope experiment yet, why not?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom