Trump runs for POTUS / Trumped Up! Part IV

[acbytesla]

No, it's called language. Here is one of those areas where you have to think. Not every rich person or person who gives to a campaign is part of the ruling elite. You really don't get this do you?

No, you don't get it. Your term is amorphous as who rules is constantly changing. It's also conspiracy theory bs.

Lol
More BS, now you're just making things up. If he's cheated so many, you'd think I'd be news?

Not really. Trump exaggerates everything. Not really a surprise to anyone including you.

I've never argued the amount, it's a lot no matter what.

Compared to you and me, yeah, but it's pathetic in terms of even what his father left him. If he'd of simply sat on the properties his father left him he'd be worth double what he is today. If Trump simply hadn't blown so many opportunities you might say he is a powerhouse in New York real estate but he grotesquely overextended and his bullying and confrontations caused him to lose a great deal of his wealth.

Fueled by a slew of bank loans in the late 1980s, Trump absorbed an airline, a football team, a landmark hotel, a bunch of casinos, a yacht, and other nifty stuff -- almost all of which he eventually lost because he couldn’t juggle the debt payments.
https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2016-01-27/donald-trump-s-track-record-on-deals

Read the Bloomberg article about how Trump blew the opportunity of a lifetime. It's actually fascinating. It's about Manhattan’s West Side Yards, a sprawling, 77-acre tract abutting the Hudson River between 59th and 72nd Streets and at the time the largest privately owned undeveloped stretch of land in New York City.

Or he just changed his mind because dems would once on anything.

How convenient. LMAO. Have you noticed that the blowhard says a lot of bs, and virtually never backs it up?

Lol
What do your competitors say about you.

One, none of them are Trump's competitors really. Maybe Wynn, but not really.

As for me, My competitors hold me in high regard as I can be counted on to keep my word.

Lol
You asked how I made the decision Obama was a failed president. I gave you the some reasons, not sure why you don't get it. Well actually I do know.

And once again, you duck the question. Congrats, that is 5 times in a row.

You don't even understand the definition. It is undeniable that we've had the same group of people in both parties for a long time. This is what happens when new people don't win elections.

You mean like Jimmy Carter in 1976, Ronald Reagan in 1980, Bill Clinton in 1992 and Barack Obama in 2008?

Yes, you don't understand politics because you're woefully uninformed. Most liberals are.

I should be offended, but I'm not. I have a degree in International relations and wrote my thesis on the Third Reich's use of propaganda. I have worked as an advisor to 2 Republican mayors as well as been involved in multiple campaigns. How about you?

 

[cullennz]

Trump and international relations

Lol

 

[logger]

No, you don't get it. Your term is amorphous as who rules is constantly changing. It's also conspiracy theory bs.
Not really. Trump exaggerates everything. Not really a surprise to anyone including you.

To you it's constantly changing, it's been the same players in and out of government for a long time.

Compared to you and me, yeah, but it's pathetic in terms of even what his father left him. If he'd of simply sat on the properties his father left him he'd be worth double what he is today. If Trump simply hadn't blown so many opportunities you might say he is a powerhouse in New York real estate but he grotesquely overextended and his bullying and confrontations caused him to lose a great deal of his wealth.

You're just making things up again, living in your self created reality. You don't just sit on things.

Read the Bloomberg article about how Trump blew the opportunity of a lifetime. It's actually fascinating. It's about Manhattan’s West Side Yards, a sprawling, 77-acre tract abutting the Hudson River between 59th and 72nd Streets and at the time the largest privately owned undeveloped stretch of land in New York City.

Without reading it, let me guess, a downturn?

How convenient. LMAO. Have you noticed that the blowhard says a lot of bs, and virtually never backs it up?

Yeah, she does it a lot

One, none of them are Trump's competitors really. Maybe Wynn, but not really.

As for me, My competitors hold me in high regard as I can be counted on to keep my word.

I'm sure you do, but you don't have any competition.

And once again, you duck the question. Congrats, that is 5 times in a row.

You can lie about it all you like. Instead of lying about it why don't you discuss the answers I've given.

You mean like Jimmy Carter in 1976, Ronald Reagan in 1980, Bill Clinton in 1992 and Barack Obama in 2008?

Yes, they use many of the recycled advisors from previous administrations.

I should be offended, but I'm not. I have a degree in International relations and wrote my thesis on the Third Reich's use of propaganda. I have worked as an advisor to 2 Republican mayors as well as been involved in multiple campaigns. How about you?

Just a logger who can't stand big obtrusive government or the ruling elite who have gotten a pretty good grip on power. By the way I completely understand why you deny the presence of a ruling elite, thanks for playin.

 

[acbytesla]

Trump and international relations

Lol

If only it was funny.

 

[cullennz]

If it is any consolation we'll just humour him and talk to diplomats

 

[logger]

Trump and international relations

Lol

I wonder if he'll call for a "reset" in relations?

 

[acbytesla]

To you it's constantly changing, it's been the same players in and out of government for a long time.

In other words, the facts don't matter.

You're just making things up again, living in your self created reality. You don't just sit on things.

I haven't made a damn thing up and I provided citations. That your head remains stubbornly deep in the sand will keep you uninformed.

Without reading it, let me guess, a downturn?

Why don't you read the article? I provided the link. Are you afraid you might learn something? **(here's a hint, NO)

Yeah, she does it a lot

Ahh, the Trump, otherwise known as the Pee Wee Herman defense of "I know you are, but what am I"

I'm sure you do, but you don't have any competition.

I'm retired now, but most of my career I certainly did have competitors.

You can lie about it all you like. Instead of lying about it why don't you discuss the answers I've given.

You haven't given any. At least with any level of specificity.

Yes, they use many of the recycled advisors from previous administrations.

You mean people with "experience? You think you can successfully govern without advisors with experience?

Just a logger who can't stand big obtrusive government or the ruling elite who have gotten a pretty good grip on power. By the way I completely understand why you deny the presence of a ruling elite, thanks for playin.

You want a country without a government? Try Somalia. Let us know how that worked out.

 

[Minoosh]

Trump's utterly trivial boast that "Mexico will pay for the wall" could end up sinking him. I'm not sure why I think that, though. It just seems like the sort of pointless embellishment that will come back to haunt him. Gary Hart said, "have me followed, I live a very boring life." (I'm paraphrasing).

I don't think Trump's going to be able to thread the needle of keeping white haters while leaving any room at all for Latinos to support him. It's too clear that Trump is relying on racists, even though I don't think Trump himself is particularly racist.

It doesn't matter who, if anyone, pays for "the wall," but now Trump has made a big deal out of it.

 

[SezMe]

His has been the slowest job recovery ever, the numbers have been awful for both of his terms.

And why is that? Could it be that Republicans have refused to pass any stimulus legislation. Oh, but look at how many hearings the Republicans held regarding employment. No, wait, we can't look at them because there weren't any. But we can look at how many votes they took in the House to repeal the ACA...about 60.

 

[cullennz]

Trump's utterly trivial boast that "Mexico will pay for the wall" could end up sinking him. I'm not sure why I think that, though. It just seems like the sort of pointless embellishment that will come back to haunt him. Gary Hart said, "have me followed, I live a very boring life." (I'm paraphrasing).

I don't think Trump's going to be able to thread the needle of keeping white haters while leaving any room at all for Latinos to support him. It's too clear that Trump is relying on racists, even though I don't think Trump himself is particularly racist.

It doesn't matter who, if anyone, pays for "the wall," but now Trump has made a big deal out of it.

Would have thought promising deporting 11,000,000 people and punishing women who have an abortion wouldn't help either

 

[catsmate]

Dudalb was referring to the threat of deportation of American citizens of hispanic origin that don't kowtow to Trump's racist policies. You know, unconstitutional punishment for a crime of opinion.

That didn't stop the US last time.

 

[catsmate]

Like that time he went to Mexico and the beleaguered Mexican president said "not paying for that wall" and Trump said, "yeah we didn't talk about paying for the wall", and the Mexican president corrected him, and then Trump agreed with the correction?

Tough as jello, that one. One hell of a negotiator. Got steamrolled before he could even get to the table. Tough.

Folded like a cheap umbrella.

 

[cullennz]

Folded like a cheap umbrella.

Lol

Can I use that?

 

[catsmate]

Lol

Can I use that?

Feel free, it's not original to me.

 

[cullennz]

His problem, it seems to me, is he has never had people on equal footing just telling him he is an ********. In his head he seems to think POTUS just means I say this. Do it.

Ie dumbarse

 

[Rare Truth]

I write and review a lot of NDAs. I agree with your assessment and try to make them as reciprocal as the relationship warrants.

This one likely wouldn't be enforceable in many jurisdictions due to its breadth. But do you really want to pay me to litigate that for you?

Just adding this here...

"The full extent of Trump's lawsuits involving non-disclosure breaches is unclear — and that's also by Trump's design.

Trump's confidentiality agreements stipulate that disputes may be handled by the American Arbitration Association with the result that it keeps legal matters out of court, and information would be out of public view. That decision is the sole discretion of Trump and others protected by the agreement.

But public court documents show he's been aggressive in targeting some of those who divulged information about him or his businesses."

http://bigstory.ap.org/article/1454...rump-employees-keeping-quiet-legally-required

 

[cullennz]

The dude will make one trip to Britain. Pretend the bravado and get slapped down like a fly

 

[Andy_Ross]

He was wrong.

Maybe so but once signed and promised the US had to abide by the terms it agreed.

 

[Andy_Ross]

I'll tell you exactly why. With taxes every person walks right up to the edge. In business In many places he may have crossed that line or it might appear that he has. The IRS code is left up to interpretation in many areas, it takes a professional to help people through it so that you can save as much as possible without crossing that line.

His portfolio is quite large and the dems would take every opportunity to try and destroy him over every little instance of balancing that line. He should never release them!!

It's not been a problem for any other candidate.

 

[zooterkin]

Thread getting long, continued here.

Posted By: zooterkin