'gravity', eh?? You could have said 'Duccolslopelgerts' and it would have had more Veracity!!
Let's see...
<spam snipped for brevity>
So you deny the existence of gravity.
Well, no, obviously you don't because even on a flat earth stuff falls down when you drop it. So what you actually do is gish gallop through a blizzard of misleading flimflam to try to make it look as if we can't make any useful calculations with the familiar Newtonian model of gravity.
You're wrong, of course. People design bridges, buildings, aircraft, spacecraft and a whole host of other stuff using Newtonian mechanics to describe forces including gravity. And it works really well. The thing is, your screed just pulls together a lot of stuff, some real, some garbage, including the fact that Newtonian physics stops working so well when relativistic or quantum mechanical effects become significant.
That's irrelevant. You either don't know that or you just want to try to bamboozle us into not noticing that you don't have a coherent point to make.
Anyway, since you have freshly vomited it onto the page again for us, I just wanted to bring attention to this little gem of algebraic incompetence which I alluded to once before:
Let's hammer this nonsensical
Mytho-matheMagics into oblivion once and for all, mmm K? So let's go back to Newton, Fg ∝ m
1M
2/d
2 (and Cavedish: Fg = G m
1M
2/d
2 ) so the Force of Gravity is critically dependent on all the elements in these expressions, Right?
OK, let's assume that both equations above, including Big "G", is correct.
Let's look @ the relationship between "Centrifugal Force" (F
c) and (F
g) "Force of Gravity". Basically, we want to set them "Equal" ...that way, we can calculate "The Force" holding ANY planet in their "alleged" respective orbit around the Sun.
So as before we'll define terms:
m
1 (Mass of 1 Body...I will be using the Earth here but it can be any mass), M
2 will be the Mass of The Sun, V = Velocity, r = Radius (distance between Earth and Sun) :
F
c = m ( V
2/r )
F
g = G m
1M
2/d
2 or (r
2)
Let's set them Equal:
F
c = m
Earth ( V
2/r ) = G m
Earth M
Sun / r
2 = F
g . So a little Algebra...
F
c =
mEarth ( V
2/r ) = G
mEarth M
Sun / r
2 = F
g ....
F
c = ( V
2/r ) = G M
Sun / r
2 = Fg !!! We can Stop right here, See The Problem??
F
c and F
g are
NO LONGER "FORCES" because we just Eliminated ( " m " ) from both sides of the Equation! Remember...
F
c = m ( V
2/r ) and...... F
g = G m
1M
2/d
2 or (r
2) !!
D U N "DONE". When you cancel " m "...you cancel "The FORCE", simple. This is the epitome of
Mytho-matheMagical Buffoonery.
So let's look at what you have here. You quite likely copied and pasted it from another forum so you may not know what the stuff you posted means.
The earth remains in orbit around the sun because it's constantly accelerating towards the sun. You produce an expession for the force required to keep the earth orbiting (F
c) and the force the sun's gravity exerts on the earth (F
g). Since gravity is what keeps the earth in orbit those two should be equal.
So what do you do then? You notice that both sides of the equation contain the mass of the earth, so those cancel out.
A competent schoolchild would see the implication of this: the mass of the earth doesn't affect the balance of the equation.
Any object travelling in earth's orbit would continue in that orbit, whether it was a planet, an asteroid or a grapefruit.
Do you make that leap of perception? No. Your head asplode. Waaa! These are no longer forces! Algebra must be wrong! Waaa!
The brighter schoolchild would raise a disappointed eyebrow and indicate that yes, this is what happens when you cancel out the terms for mass in a force equation. The terms you have left describe acceleration. And they are still equal. And mathematics is not, in fact, broken. Even if
you don't get it.
So, as I said, you appear to be mathematically incompetent, so there can be no plausible reason why you demand from us a description of gravity in terms of entropy other than to try to browbeat everyone.
Your flat earth isn't surrounded by an ice wall. Just a wall of ********.
, you don't even know what an Actual Scientific Hypothesis is since (lol) you failed to recognize "Since you don't have a prayer of producing a single viable "Independent Variable"..." MEANING: No Scientific Hypothesis!!
)...
(LOL)--- we're sorry to say, suffered such a Severe Bludgeoning out in the Woodshed that it Vapor-Locked immediately and is now in it's rightful place, beside it's fairytale sisters: Phlogiston, evolution, big bang, black holes, multiverses, SHAMWOW Towels, billion of years, ect ect. 
...
Wait...What, Huh? Richard Richard Richard... a Mathematical -- "Scientific Theory", eh? This is tantamount to having a "theory" of Married Bachelors!! If anyone needs me to explain "why", you have more "pressing issues" than Flat Earth or 'gravity'.