• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Why not admit that Hubble is lost and gone ?

Reading this and other Daniel threads it wouldn't suprise me if he doesn't believe in air resistance either.

I don't think he actually believes any of it, or at least doesn't particularly care. He's just trying to get the maximum attention possible from the grown-ups for minimum effort expended. If I thought he was actually serious, I might engage with him, but first I'd have to pick out one or two pieces of wrongness from the mess of gibberish to start. Since I think he's just trolling, though, he'll have to get in line behind the other intentional troll (Malbec) and functional troll (Kyoon).
 
The flat earth is accelerating upwards at 9.81m/s/s and has been doing so for the past 6000 years.


What in the World is this ?? :jaw-dropp

If you would have said that the dodecahedron Earth is a being spun on the tip of a dark matter pin on the back of a turtle by Invisible 3 Toed Gnomes... it would have had more veracity!!

All is not lost, however; You got 2 things right: 'Flat Earth' and '6,000 Years'.


regards
 
In an attempt to demonstrate that Newtonian physics isn't adequate for calculations on a planetary scale because quantum physics always applies, Daniel scrapes together a load of copy/paste which points out that quantum effects have shrunk to imperceptible irrelevance even at a human scale.

His incompetence is truly boundless.
 
In an attempt...


Unbelievable!! You still posting after your 'gravity' :rolleyes: debacle of megalithic proportions??

This is tantamount to the Chairman of Green Peace showing up for work the next day after he was video taped live snacking on genetically modified sunflower seeds sporting a Flame Thrower filled with liquefied Whale Blubber sparking an Inferno in drought ridden Sequoia National Park !!

oy vey
 
Unbelievable!! You still posting after your 'gravity' :rolleyes: debacle of megalithic proportions??

This is tantamount to the Chairman of Green Peace showing up for work the next day after he was video taped live snacking on genetically modified sunflower seeds sporting a Flame Thrower filled with liquefied Whale Blubber sparking an Inferno in drought ridden Sequoia National Park !!

oy vey

Rather than engaging in argumentum ad colorful yet meaningless analogy, perhaps you could explain how an observer at the equator on an equinox could see the sun on the horizon at a compass heading of 90°?
 
I can see tour companies falling over themselves to organise treks and cruises to 'The Edge of The World' :)

That never occurred to me, and I think it's a brilliant observation. Going to the edge of the world would be as popular and fun as, say, going to Antarctica; in exactly the same way that Bigfoot encounters should be as lucrative as seeing a tiger.
 
How can you have a Vacuum (Space) attached to a Non-Vacuum (Earth) and still retain the Properties of a Vacuum and a Non-Vacuum in the same system, simultaneously....?

Have you never been in a tall building and had your ears pop in the elevator, or driving up or down a hill? How is that pressure difference at different altitudes maintained? At what point do you think it stops and something prevents it from reaching 0 if you go high enough?

Or to make an analogy, have you ever been swimming and noticed the pressure increases with depth? You can't pretend that doesn't happen. Why do you think that is different than the atmosphere?
 
Have you never been in a tall building and had your ears pop in the elevator, or driving up or down a hill? How is that pressure difference at different altitudes maintained? At what point do you think it stops and something prevents it from reaching 0 if you go high enough?

Or to make an analogy, have you ever been swimming and noticed the pressure increases with depth? You can't pretend that doesn't happen. Why do you think that is different than the atmosphere?

What in anything said so far leads you to believe he can't pretend that things that obvious don't exist?
 
Okay... So some pf the posts about why a lecture on Quantum Physics might not mean what Daniel thinks, was cut. I am going to flag this post to mods incase it is too far from the topic. But I intend to give a quick summary of why saying "Newtons theories don't work for really small things" is not the same as saying they just plain don't work, and certainly not why they don't work for big old planets.

I admit, I am one of the stupidest posters here, so by all means if I make a mistake others are welcome to heckle.

So quantum literally means an indivisibly small particle. (And not "magic science", if nothing else you should now understand a Bond movie title.) It refers to itty bitty particles like photons and electrons.

Why do these need their own branch of physics?

They do weird things. They exist in two places at once. Or they can be more than one thing. A photon of light can act like a particle or a waveform (that complicated word means something in the form of a wave, such as an emission on the electromagnetic scale in the visible light spectrum). So a photon particle, fired at a board with two splits in, can pass through both at the same time.

So yes, a lecturer will say things like you have to shoot down Newtonian ideas. Because quantum scale events don't follow those rules.

But big things do. Just as Newtonian rules wont work on tiny little particles, the quantum rules wont work on planets. The Earth will exist in one place, and have to pass through one slit or the other. It wont pass through both at once.

This why there is such trouble looking for a unified theory. If we took the "Shooting down Newtonian physics" literally in all fields of physics, then we would be in real trouble.

But what we can observe is little things acting one way, big things acting another, and a Nobel Prize for whoever writes the theory that meshes the two into one single dynamic.

So, when we watch those lectures linked to before, and watch the whole video for context we know what the guy is saying. If we look at ever smaller scales, we fall further and further from conventional physics. But that does not undo everything we know about big things. It does not mean all our experiments stop working. It just means we know diddy particles have their own rules.
 
Unbelievable!! You still posting after your 'gravity' :rolleyes: debacle of megalithic proportions??

This is tantamount to the Chairman of Green Peace showing up for work the next day after he was video taped live snacking on genetically modified sunflower seeds sporting a Flame Thrower filled with liquefied Whale Blubber sparking an Inferno in drought ridden Sequoia National Park !!

oy vey

Still posting from an argument of ignorance and incredulity fallacies I see.

I suggest you go to school, and take a few science courses.
Unless you like being a laughingstock, of course.
 
That never occurred to me, and I think it's a brilliant observation. Going to the edge of the world would be as popular and fun as, say, going to Antarctica; in exactly the same way that Bigfoot encounters should be as lucrative as seeing a tiger.

But you cannot. According to such claimants, the UN has a permanent military presence who will flat out shoot you if you make the attempt all of the way around the circumfence (apologies to Pratchet).

These guardians of the ice wall are as imaginary as the Night's watch. Does not not stop the Flat Earth cranks.
 
Unbelievable!! You still posting after your 'gravity' :rolleyes: debacle of megalithic proportions??

This is tantamount to the Chairman of Green Peace showing up for work the next day after he was video taped live snacking on genetically modified sunflower seeds sporting a Flame Thrower filled with liquefied Whale Blubber sparking an Inferno in drought ridden Sequoia National Park !!

oy vey

But gravity is still there and the earth is still a sphere.
 
The thing I love about this board is that it has an international membership.

Often times I have to wait for a response during a debate here because the person I'm having the conversation with is asleep due to the fact that they're on the other side of the planet.

While it's midday here, it's midnight somewhere else. Hence, a round ball in space.
 
The thing I love about this board is that it has an international membership.

Often times I have to wait for a response during a debate here because the person I'm having the conversation with is asleep due to the fact that they're on the other side of the planet.

While it's midday here, it's midnight somewhere else. Hence, a round ball in space.

That's science!
 
I highly doubt that you would know what REAL "Science" was if it landed on your head, spun around, and whistled dixie.

Let's TEST my claim...

Post The Scientific Method...?

Define and list the characteristics of a Scientific Hypothesis....?

Define Scientific Theory...?

Define Scientific Law...?

A 5th Grade General Science Graduate could answer these with no sweat in less than 5 minutes, without wiki/google. :thumbsup:

Go ahead...?


regards

Well not to brag but I won my Junior High School Science Fair, I digress.

I could answer everyone of those, BUT I'm not instead I'll direct you to my website which has the real fact they don't want you to know.

www.therealtruthaboutsciencetheciafbinwoilluminatidontwantyoutoknow.geocties.org.net.

I'm sure an imminent "ah see you dodged my questions" is coming, but not before the M.I.B come...LOOK OUT THEY ARE BEHIND YOU!
 
Last edited:
Vacuum of space

Originally Posted by Daniel
"How can you have a Vacuum (Space) attached to a Non-Vacuum (Earth) and still retain the Properties of a Vacuum and a Non-Vacuum in the same system, simultaneously....?"

Let's assume you're correct and entropy prevents a non vacuum system from being attached to a vacuum. This means that either : there is no atmosphere on the earth, or that the atmosphere continues into what we term 'space'

Given that I am breathing quite happily now, I assume that there is an atmosphere on earth, so the only remaining option is that the atmosphere continues into space. So why do astronauts, cosmonauts, taikonauts and pilots of high altitude planes need breathing apparatus?

3TL
 
You are told you are getting pictures . You don't know the source -- might be HSC .

And what's the simplest explanation? If people are telling you that you can see the damn thing from the surface, and that we're getting data from it that is consistent with its abilities and limits, why insist that there's a convoluted reason why all of that is wrong, rather than accept that, in fact, it is you who are wrong?
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom