Suddenly, A Flat Earther Appears!

Daniel,

You have repeated your reasons why the earth can't be a spinning ball enough times, they must be true by now. It is time to educate us on the wonders of the real world, we all want to know about the flat earth.

What keeps the atmosphere over the flat earth?
What makes everything fall downward?
What holds the sun in its circular path?

Those three should be good for now.

Also why has no church group spent some of the money they scammed from the masses and funded an expedition? Why don't flat earthers go to the ice wall and bring back evidence of this massive conspiracy?
 
Last edited:
I cannot believe that there are still forum members taking the time to answer Daniel as if he were serious.

But hey, have at it! :popcorn1:popcorn1:popcorn1:popcorn1
 
The techniques Daniel uses are interesting to learn when dealing with non-troll CT's though.

One of his main methods, apart from massive amounts of random numbers and pictures without any attempt to listen to the counter arguments is to abandon anything that he posted when he truly cannot counter it.

For instance, when it was pointed out that according to his model of air friction it would be impossible to throw a ball forward in a moving train is to simply abandon it.
The same with the air / water on a flat earth staying on.

Not to mention that the shortest way to get from one coast to another on Antarctica is by flying over the continent, which has been done numerous times, which in the flat earth model is impossible.

And of course the massive amount of contempt in his language to anyone disagreeing.
All in all, a nice and simple practice thread for anyone wanting to counter a CT'er with a more serious attitude that actually made an effort to research his/her own materials.
 
What keeos the atmosphere from leaking in to space in tbe Flat Earth model?

Why doesn't it spill over the edge ir out in to the vacuum of space?
 
Please post one of the WHOLE Earth that's NOT...?

You already posted several images of Earth taken by Apollo that show the whole Earth.

This shrill demand gets trotted out by FEBS/anti-science/anti-Apollo nutjobs on a regular basis, and usually they don't have the wit to realise that if you only see half, or a quarter, or any other fraction of the Earth lit up the rest of it is actually there - it's just not lit by the sun, which is a long way away.

Why not find one of those photographs showing, for example, a quarter Earth, and explain to us why the terminator is curved?

Oh, and you don't get to decide which photographs are and are not acceptable - a composite image is still an image. Since when did you get to dictate that they aren't allowed?
 
Last edited:
Hey, Daniel, the next time I fly to Germany from Seattle, I'll make sure to tell the pilot that he can't take the polar route because the earth really isn't a spheroid. I'm sure he'll want to know that.
 
It's Daniel's idea of fun. Not much of a game, if you ask me, but it takes all sorts ...
 
Appeal to Ridicule (Fallacy)
Ad Hominem (Fallacy)
3rd grade Name Calling.

Yes. You got to me with your stupidity and trolling. You have avoided so many things it is ridiculous. I wonder what kind of person you are to do such brainless stuff. Let me give an example.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=11375341&postcount=568

Run along and read it, then answer it.

Why are there time zones.

How does the Sun set without disappearing to a dot.

Other stuff I have asked and ignored.

Explain how air density occurs.

Explain how it and electric dipole keeps objects on the surface and pulls them down from whatever height(airplanes!).

Explain why the air doesn't spill out the sides.

Errr, Isn't Infrared, ahh.... HEAT ?? :boggled:

Infrared is felt by humans as heat.

Didn't you read the posts above discussing the Absence of Conduction and Convection due to the lack of "molecules" --- Density ?? (You had to because you "QUOTED IT" in your post) So :confused:100000----> ...

Your stupidity confounds me. Infrared is radiation, it doesn't need molecules to travel any more than light does:boxedin:

Where, per adventure, are these Fairytale Reflectors REFLECTING IT TO (!!!) ....?

https://www.quora.com/Why-do-satellites-seem-to-be-wrapped-in-golden-colored-foils

Clueless troll is clueless troll.
 
Last edited:
Errr, Isn't Infrared, ahh.... HEAT

More or less. For the layman, the distinction is unimportant.

Didn't you read the posts above discussing the Absence of Conduction and Convection due to the lack of "molecules" --- Density ??

Correct. First you asked how the high temperature in a high layer didn't fry space vehicles. Answer: Lack of conduction due to low density.

Then you asked why sunlight doesn't fry them. Answer: Reflection, and re-radiation of excess heat.

Where, per adventure, are these Fairytale Reflectors REFLECTING IT TO (!!!) ....?

To space. Plenty of it out there.

Hans
 
Hey, Daniel, the next time I fly to Germany from Seattle, I'll make sure to tell the pilot that he can't take the polar route because the earth really isn't a spheroid. I'm sure he'll want to know that.

I have flown Toronto to Hong Kong a few times. The routing is either "over the Pole" or over the Pacific depending on the high level winds. For some reason, no matter which direction is taken, the flights last exactly the same time. :confused:
 
Read up a bit on rail guns. They have, of course, a trajectory like all guns. While the muzzle speed may be MACH7, the projectile slows down like all non-propelled projectiles and curves down.

Another flat-earth proof down in flames.

Hans
 

Attachments

  • railgunplan2.jpg
    railgunplan2.jpg
    48.9 KB · Views: 19
It's Daniel's idea of fun. Not much of a game, if you ask me, but it takes all sorts ...

Maybe it's the challenge of defending an unwinnable position. He's like Custer at little big horn. That is, if Custer never brought any guns or ammo and figured he could defeat the Souix with his bugle.
 
...It uses material that massively reflects infrared...

Actually, in the space business we use materials that have the right combination of reflecting and emitting at the right wavelengths.

I cannot believe that there are still forum members taking the time to answer Daniel as if he were serious...

Agreed. I also believe Daniel is simply yanking people's chains.
 


It's not, as demonstrated.


Actually yes. Quite a hefty chunk of my degree


And...? :rolleyes: Go ahead....?

Haven't eaten meat for 32 years.


I'm sorry for your loss.




So "Na'ahh", eh? Riveting! Was Generalized Sweeping Ipse Dixit 'Hand-Wave' Dismissal Baseless 'bare' Assertion Fallacies a hefty chunk of your 'degree' also?


Lots of evidence supporting a sphere.


Ready(?)...AND...?


Prove it's a contradiction. Empirically.


"Gas expansion into a vacuum, mixing of ideal gases or liquids, diffusion, effusion, colligative effects, and osmosis each fundamentally involves an increase in entropy due to increased dispersion of energy (with no change in total energy in the case of ideal substances) due to a greater number of microstates for the particular system involved."
entropysite.oxy.edu/entropy_is_simple/

Take an empty liter bottle of soda, suck the air out, and replace the cap quickly. Ensure the sides of the container are somewhat collapsed (denoting a very minor Vacuum). Pound a 3 inch nail through a small sheet of 1/4 in ply wood and lay the board flat on the ground (butted up against STRONG 'gravity' :rolleyes:) with the business side of the nail in the vertical position. Puncture the bottom of the bottle with the nail and tell us what happens.....?

Now for my claim: 'Flip the Script' where you have an Exponentially Stronger Vacuum with Exponentially Weaker 'gravity'...what do you suppose will happen? :cool:


He's talking to you (and your cohorts)...

If your theory is found to be against the second law of thermodynamics, I can give you no hope; there is nothing for [your theory] but to collapse in the deepest humiliation.
Arthur S. Eddington, The Nature of the Physical World (1930), p. 74.


That isn't the case, and you know it.


Another in a Loooong List of "Na'ahhs".



What stops the atmosphere pouring off the edge?


'Pouring Off' into what, Pray Tell...?

The 'sides' of The Firmament. There is no 'edge', you can't fall off :rolleyes: And you'll never get close to any alleged 'edge'.

Caveat: I personally cannot Empirically Validate "The Firmament"...even though it's quite strong, it's circumstantial evidence.


I see satellites over my house all the time.


Post a Pic...? SEEING (Observing) is not TESTS (!!) for the Billionth TIME!! What's your "Independent Variable"... your Eyelids in concert with your Imagination and Pre-Conceived Bias? :boggled:


I am watching TV transmitted from one.


Why? Cause that's what they TOLD YOU :rolleyes:

They also say that:

Ink/Paper/Glue Molecules can Author Technical Instruction Manuals/ Blueprints.
Something can come from Nothing.
Life poofed into existence from Pond Scum.
:boggled:
Among numerous other ground squirrel level reasoning atrocities. I suppose you're FULLY On-Board with those also...?


Funny, my and every 'satellite' dish in the neighborhood is damn near pointing directly towards the horizon (Read: to a ground based "Repeater Tower"). ;)


regards
 
"Gas expansion into a vacuum, mixing of ideal gases or liquids, diffusion, effusion, colligative effects, and osmosis each fundamentally involves an increase in entropy

<oft-repeated verbiage snipped for brevity>
Please explain in what way the point you think you are making applies to the atmosphere on a round earth but not to a flat one.
 

Back
Top Bottom