Er... that picture shows why it is silly to talk about a sphere rotating at any particular speed. The speed is a function of latitude.
Suddenly, A Flat Earther Appears!
- Thread starter 332nd
- Start date
Er... that picture shows why it is silly to talk about a sphere rotating at any particular speed. The speed is a function of latitude.
MRC_Hans
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2002
- Messages
- 24,961
Ahhh professor, 'youtube' is merely "A Medium" for goodness sakes
Well, Einstein, Not all media are created equal. I'm sure you would trust rest-room graffiti less than a science magazine. .... Oh, well, in YOUR case, but real people would.
Your appeal here is mind-numbing; it screams absolute bankruptcy. Are you saying "The Medium" is Fallacious ??
No. The medium, in the case of youtube, is indiscriminate: Anybody can publish anything they like.
Explained and done with.
Explained and done with.
Explained and done with.
Hans
Erock
Muse
Such ignorance takes the breath away. It's ok, I've given chasing you up about the stuff that confuses you and that you cannot answer.
About the size of an object in a picture.
1. Take any picture with the Earth in.
2. Find the field of view of the lens on the camera.
3. From the picture, count the pixels across.
4. From same picture count the Earth pixels across.
That is all you need to verify that what you claim is not steaming donkey crap.
Apollo camera was 49 degrees focal length if you include the full untrimmed picture, or 47 degrees for most HD ones posted. So take 47 degrees as your starting point. Now run along and stop pestering people with your trolling. Report back when you have an answer. Or judging by your history, do nothing and repeat your claim
Erock
Muse
Then that should be the Thermosplane, right? The Temps reach up to 2000o Celsius.
Please identify the materials that the "satellites" are made of AND their "Melting Points"...?
Who the hell took the stundies away!! This guy is a bleeding gold mine.
Danny lad. The ability of something to transmit heat is somewhat diminished by the lack of particles to do so. So why are you here? To provide the regulars with a chew toy and amusement?
Here. Stick your hand in an oven, air temperature 250C. Hot but didn't burn. Now run along and do it in a cup of boiling water. I should warn all watching children not to do this
Density, makes all the difference. Has bugger all effect on keeping somebody on the Earth though, only the very stupid think it does. Oh wait
Now stick your hand in the thermosphere and presto, not barely a molecule in sight to pass on the energy.
Jack by the hedge
Safely Ignored
- Joined
- Oct 14, 2009
- Messages
- 23,350
When it's perspective, it's perspective. Try to keep up.Oh so NOW it's Perspective, eh?
No, it's just a composite image. It only becomes a fraud when somebody pretends it's something it's not, and sadly you seem to copy and paste your material from such people.So it's a Fraud. Thanks
Not in the least. Merely explaining that there is no inconsistency, as you wish to imply.
I presume 'thermosplane' is your comedy version of the thermosphere. If your made-up version of the atmosphere has flat plane versions of the layers in the real atmosphere, why did you pretend to reject the idea of an atmosphere which gradually tapers off toward vacuum at high altitude?Then that should be the Thermosplane, right? The Temps reach up to 2000o Celsius.
Please identify the materials that the "satellites" are made of AND their "Melting Points"...?
That aside, the molecules in the thermosphere are moving very fast so their temperature is high, but they are so few and far between that the rate at which heat energy can be transferred to a satellite by conduction is negligible. It may well be at 2,000°C but there just isn't enough air up there to heat an object up.
I suppose you knew that already. Meantime can you finally explain why the sun sets on the horizon instead of 20° up in the air, and when it does so it looks exactly the same size as it did at noon? (answer: No, not with a flat earth you can't.)
Andy_Ross
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2010
- Messages
- 68,318
Daniel. You keep putting the Coriolis Effect not bring real in to your reasons for a Flat Earth.
You have been provided with links and references to military manuals for calculating the Coriolis effect and how it has to be accounted for when calculating Firing Solutions for both Artillery and long range marksmanship eith rifles.
Why do you ignore this?
You have been provided with links and references to military manuals for calculating the Coriolis effect and how it has to be accounted for when calculating Firing Solutions for both Artillery and long range marksmanship eith rifles.
Why do you ignore this?
Erock
Muse
Taking this version of the picture:
http://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/thumbnails/image/as17-134-20387.jpg
It is 3804 pixels across. Using the camera FOV of 47 degrees gives 81 pixels per degree. The Earth spans around 165 pixels.
The Earth from the Moon is 4x the Moon angular size. This equates to 2 degrees. 2 x 81 = 162.
Considering we are talking about a wide angled lens with slight distortion as one would expect, multiple generations of copy and print, the expected 162 against my findings of 165 is plenty accurate enough.
Certainly puts to bed the moronic claim that it was too tiny
Do you have anything you wish to add?
[qimg]https://s32.postimg.org/i8mz2tag5/Bovine_excrement.jpg[/qimg]
Taking this version of the picture:
http://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/thumbnails/image/as17-134-20387.jpg
It is 3804 pixels across. Using the camera FOV of 47 degrees gives 81 pixels per degree. The Earth spans around 165 pixels.
The Earth from the Moon is 4x the Moon angular size. This equates to 2 degrees. 2 x 81 = 162.
Considering we are talking about a wide angled lens with slight distortion as one would expect, multiple generations of copy and print, the expected 162 against my findings of 165 is plenty accurate enough.
Certainly puts to bed the moronic claim that it was too tiny
Do you have anything you wish to add?
http://pigeonsnest.co.uk/stuff/nasa-fakes-moon-landing.html
threadworm
Graduate Poster
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2012
- Messages
- 1,832
This photo is a composite of several photos, hence the difference in angles.
Only a moron would make the shadows claim in that image without checking.
threadworm
Graduate Poster
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2012
- Messages
- 1,832
Screen Actors Guild Award and The Stanley Cup of Photo-Shop
<cuts the crap>
regards
Why bother with modern scans, why not go to the originals? It's not hard to get hold of contemporary books full of Gemini and Apollo images that pre-date Photoshop by at least a decade. I have lots of them.
Why be so lazy as to parrot other people's claims without checking? Are you scared your intellectual house of cards will collapse?
Why not go to the link in my signature and check how every single Apollo image of Earth is corroborated by weather satellite data. Even Soviet images Earth are corroborated by weather satellite data.
You won't, because you're too lazy.
jaydeehess
Penultimate Amazing
Not to mention keeping the ice zombies out.
jaydeehess
Penultimate Amazing
Who the hell took the stundies away!! This guy is a bleeding gold mine.
Danny lad. The ability of something to transmit heat is somewhat diminished by the lack of particles to do so. So why are you here? To provide the regulars with a chew toy and amusement?
Here. Stick your hand in an oven, air temperature 250C. Hot but didn't burn. Now run along and do it in a cup of boiling water. I should warn all watching children not to do this
Now stick your hand in the thermosphere and presto, not barely a molecule in sight to pass on the energy.
The near constant confusion between heat and temperature with conspiracists is astounding.
smartcooky
Penultimate Amazing
Anyone know what the version number was for the 1969 release of Photoshop?
Can Daniel explain how it is possible to digitally manipulate even a 1 megapixel digital image on a computer with only 1kb of memory before disk media was invented?
Can Daniel explain how it is possible to digitally manipulate even a 1 megapixel digital image on a computer with only 1kb of memory before disk media was invented?
Well how could they ALL show 'jpeg compression' when they weren't ALL jpeg to begin with ?? (ROTFLOL)
As mentioned... It matters not, you're just "Whistlin Past The Graveyard" and conjuring anyway, SEE: http://regex.info/exif.cgi <---- It's the Crucible
regards
What 'Concept' might that be?
Can you grasp The ENTROPY 'Concept'?? If so, how are you still breathing...?
regards
Erock
Muse
Well how could they ALL show 'jpeg compression' when they weren't ALL jpeg to begin with ?? (ROTFLOL)
Can we stop with the "oh brothers", the infantile rolling on the floor and LOLing
and the rhetoric. Everyone but you can see you are a big wuss avoiding all the questions.Photographs taken before the digital age get converted to digital. Duhhhh
None of those pictures are originals, many have selective editing from outside of NASA. The Earth one has that small section separately enhanced because it is in a different focus to the foreground. DuhhhhPosting that at the end of every post is like crapping in somebody's garden and saying goodbye with a big smile on your face.
1. Modern Scans ???
2. I did go to the originals and 'Plopped them' in here: http://regex.info/exif.cgi
oh brother. How pray tell do you know that....Special evo Mind Powers?
Even if that were the case...
Do you understand the Biochemistry of digestion and absorption? Do you eat steak? If so, are you just 'Parroting' someone else's work and putting your life in their hands?
Ahh you believe and 'parrot' mindlessly, Without even a SHRED of Empirical Evidence...
1. We live on a "Spinning Ball" rotating @ 1,000 mph, revolving around the sun @ 66,600 mph (axis 66.6 degrees from the ecliptic), with the sun traveling @ 500,000 mph around the Milky Way---which is itself moving @ 670,000,000 mph!!!
Then in Direct Contradiction to a 'Pillar of Science' (2LOT)...
2. That it's possible to have a Vacuum attached to a Non-Vacuum in the same System, Simultaneously!!! ROTFLOL
3. Believe that a Projectile "A Bullet" can travel @ Mach 7 (!!!) ascend and descend a 'Bulge Height' of 2604 feet and hit a Target 125 Miles away hidden behind 8,476 feet (over 1.5 Miles!!) of curvature??
Among numerous other ground squirrel level reasoning atrocities and you have the hubris to challenge someone else's Intellectual Integrity??
Begging The Question Fallacy: "satellites".
These 'allegedly' live in the Thermoplane which reaches Temps of 2000o Celsius. Can you please post the materials these 'satellites' are made of THEN.... post their respective "Melting Points"?
regards
Begging The Question Fallacy: "satellites".
These 'allegedly' live in the Thermoplane which reaches Temps of 2000o Celsius. Can you please post the materials these 'satellites' are made of THEN.... post their respective "Melting Points"?
'Thermoplane'? Google tells me this is an underfloor heating system. 2000°C is far too hot for a home heating method and absolutely no place for satellites to be. They're all spiky and would shred the ladies' tights in a jiffy.
A claim you haven't proven.
Well how could they ALL show 'jpeg compression' when they weren't ALL jpeg to begin with ?? (ROTFLOL)
A metadata viewer will only show you the data from the last program used to process it. Since all Apollo photos were on film then had to be scanned before being uploaded online, they've all been processed in some way. So what?As mentioned... It matters not, you're just "Whistlin Past The Graveyard" and conjuring anyway, SEE: http://regex.info/exif.cgi <---- It's the Crucible
regards
Noted that you ignored most of the rest of my post.