AlaskaBushPilot
Illuminator
- Joined
- Nov 6, 2010
- Messages
- 4,341
What they voted for is to be inherently respected. It's their country.
What they voted for is to be inherently respected. It's their country.
What they voted for is to be inherently respected. It's their country.
What they voted for is to be inherently respected. It's their country.
No,there right to vote for it is to be respected. We can still think they made a really,really,bad decision.
Well since you said Britain and not England, I'm gonna go out on a limb and say they were a bit more divided during the Jacobite rebellion than now. That was about a century more recent than their last civil war.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacobite_rising_of_1745
I meant England, and am kicking myself in the butt for that mistake.
It's when I pulled the trigger that I realised there was a cartridge in the chamber. Oooooops!
I think there are a fair few people about so used to their vote having absolutely no relationship to the way the country is run that they had so little respect for the system and for their vote that they thought it would be a bit funny to use it in an anti-establishment sort of a way, tee-hee.
Do we have years of political disenfranchisement to blame for what is likely to be a very depressing next 40 years?
I am beginning to think that Heinlein was right when he said it was a mistake to allow someone the power of the franchise simply because they can avoid being killed before reaching the age of 18.......
True,but a protest vote without considering what exacty you are voting for is still a stupid thing to do.
How would you limit it? IQ? Education? Economic status?
I'm not saying that universal suffrage is perfect, but to paraphrase Churchill: 'Universal suffrage is the worst form of suffrage, except for all the others.'
Thinking there is some big movement to exit EU is so far delusional. Any idiot can call for it, but that only means he got somehow to "megaphone"...
How would you limit it? IQ? Education? Economic status?
I'm not saying that universal suffrage is perfect, but to paraphrase Churchill: 'Universal suffrage is the worst form of suffrage, except for all the others.'
What they voted for is to be inherently respected. It's their country.
I am beginning to think that Heinlein was right when he said it was a mistake to allow someone the power of the franchise simply because they can avoid being killed before reaching the age of 18.......
Pretty much the only one I see wanting that is the greek or grexit.
TV reporters are finding people across the UK who say they voted Leave as a protest, never realizing that they could win. The sudden economic impact is serving as a wake-up call to others. And of course Scotland and Northern Ireland voted heavily to stay in the EU. Question: Is there a mechanism that would allow a "re-do?" Apparently these results are not binding in a formal, legal sense. Could Parliament or someone else say "Wait a minute. Now that the pound has collapsed and the stock market has plummeted overnight, maybe you'd like to reconsider?"