Hillary Clinton is Done: part 2

Status
Not open for further replies.
Trakar said:
Now that is post hoc pop psychology.
My assessment is particular to an individual, and qualified in that manner. Even Hillary had plenty of opportunities to become a different person than she is. But we have a definite end point and a beginning description as well as glimpses of all in-between.
Click to expand...
Not if you forever hold over her what she did or said when she was sixteen. Listen to yourself. You're arguing for one thing by saying the opposite.
 
Skeptic Ginger said:
There's plenty of evidence of the fact Clinton is as, or more, truthful than other POTUS candidates. But the double standard persists.

All Politicians Lie. Some Lie More Than Others.
Click to expand...

I suspect you will never understand this, let alone admit it, but cherry-picked data has zero probative value. And putting aside the fact that Politifact is ridiculously biased in its assessment of truth, it does not choose what statements to "fact-check" randomly. Hell, if you simply fact-checked all statements made by any politicians in the last two years with respect to Hillary Clinton's emails (and there have been thousands), you would probably find that 90% of Democrats' statements are lies and 90% of Republicans' statements are true.
 
sunmaster14 said:
I suspect you will never understand this, let alone admit it, but cherry-picked data has zero probative value. And putting aside the fact that Politifact is ridiculously biased in its assessment of truth, it does not choose what statements to "fact-check" randomly. Hell, if you simply fact-checked all statements made by any politicians in the last two years with respect to Hillary Clinton's emails (and there have been thousands), you would probably find that 90% of Democrats' statements are lies and 90% of Republicans' statements are true.
Click to expand...

I suspect you will never understand this, let alone admit it, but Clinton's been subjected to a double standard since she made the "I suppose I could have stayed home and baked cookies" comment. I suspect you will never understand this, let alone admit it, but the vast majority of Clinton's negative image is from 4 decades of the constant attack narrative by the obsessed-with-the-Clintons branch of the right wing.
 
Skeptic Ginger said:
I suspect you will never understand this, let alone admit it, but Clinton's been subjected to a double standard since she made the "I suppose I could have stayed home and baked cookies" comment. I suspect you will never understand this, let alone admit it, but the vast majority of Clinton's negative image is from 4 decades of the constant attack narrative by the obsessed-with-the-Clintons branch of the right wing.
Click to expand...

I disagree Hillary has been subjected to a double standard.

Do you disagree that cherry-picked data is not useful as evidence at all?
 
Google is now censoring "crooked Hillary" from the instant predictions results. Bing is not.

Let's see Google execs defend this nonsense.
 
Skeptic Ginger said:
I suspect you will never understand this, let alone admit it, but Clinton's been subjected to a double standard since she made the "I suppose I could have stayed home and baked cookies" comment. I suspect you will never understand this, let alone admit it, but the vast majority of Clinton's negative image is from 4 decades of the constant attack narrative by the obsessed-with-the-Clintons branch of the right wing.[/QUOTE]

Next time just type "Vast right wing conspiracy."

Because the right wing made Clintons such avid liars.
Click to expand...
 
16.5 said:
I'm not sure I follow. Can you explain further?
Click to expand...

"Instant predictions" are the search terms that pop up below the search box as you're typing. Never does "crooked Hilary" pop up until you type the entire term.

Now try it on Bing, as soon as you type "croo" you get "crooked Hillary" in the predictive search box.
 
WildCat said:
"Instant predictions" are the search terms that pop up below the search box as you're typing. Never does "crooked Hilary" pop up until you type the entire term.

Now try it on Bing, as soon as you type "croo" you get "crooked Hillary" in the predictive search box.
Click to expand...

I tried it!

This was what filled in when I got to "crooked hillar":

"crooked hillary bernie"

with no other options.

Lolz, pretty shady ****
 
16.5 said:
I'm not sure I follow. Can you explain further?
Click to expand...

Try typing it in and see what happens.

You now how it would start to guess what it was you were searching for, well it won't offer "crooked Hillary" as an option until you type almost all of it out, and then it offers, "crooked Hillary Bernie" as it's first option.
Clearly something fishy is going on.
 
Clinton right now is delivering about the best speech I've ever heard from her: not shouting, not self-referential, not accusatory. She's just quoting some of Trump's most outrageous, ridiculous claims -- torture, nuclear weapons, Isis -- and responding to them, one by one. In a debate, she will shred him.
 
Truly a phenomenal case of censorship, when you can't even prefill your Trumpism and have to type the whole stupid thing out yourself.

Alas, whatever shall we do in the face of this brutal repression?
 
Cleon said:
Truly a phenomenal case of censorship, when you can't even prefill your Trumpism and have to type the whole stupid thing out yourself.

Alas, whatever shall we do in the face of this brutal repression?
Click to expand...

Once supporters of the Orange Grifter start complaining about their first amendment rights being violated, it will be an A+ troll.
 
Cleon said:
Truly a phenomenal case of censorship, when you can't even prefill your Trumpism and have to type the whole stupid thing out yourself.

Alas, whatever shall we do in the face of this brutal repression?
Click to expand...

"crooked hillary Bernie" is NOT a Trumpism.

Put on your skeptic hat
 
sunmaster14 said:
I disagree Hillary has been subjected to a double standard.

Do you disagree that cherry-picked data is not useful as evidence at all?
Click to expand...
If you can't see or can't admit to the double standard, that seems to me to be the ultimate in confirmation bias.

I posted a link comparing apples to apples. If you want to cherry pick her fumbling the email matter then you need to compare that to the others fumbling their own issues like, Sanders lying to his followers that he is confident he can win.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom