Merged New telepathy test: which number did I write ?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Michel H said:
I have got some pictures, that I could post, in connection with the scientific testing I did with Australia. If you can give the correct answer to this question:

I would also consider more favorably a possibility of posting some of the audio files of violent noises I have (they are .wav files, recorded with Audacity).
Click to expand...
Post(how to) the audio, if you have it, Michel H.
 
Last edited:
Michel H said:
The hints are for you (members of this forum), they are not for the people who took part in my recent telepathy experiments with Australia.

The question I am asking the members of this forum is:
Why method, or which technique, which technology did I use in my recent telepathy experiments with Australia ("the opposite side of the world" for me, although the Earth is spherical of course)

Hints: cam, I have some pictures, Judge Judy, people who seemed to react telepathically during the experiments were not necessarily all in Australia.
Click to expand...
And this sounds scientific to you?
 
Michel H said:
If you do something for me, by answering this simple question:

I will do something for you as well. But I don't want to look like a fool.
Click to expand...

You already look like a fool. Posting the audio might remedy that (but nothing else) to some degree.
Post(how to) the audio, Michel H.
If you really have such audio, of course.

Go on, post(how to) the audio.
 
Michel H said:
The question I am asking the members of this forum is:
Why method, or which technique, which technology did I use in my recent telepathy experiments with Australia ("the opposite side of the world" for me, although the Earth is spherical of course)
Click to expand...

My guess is you watched some Australian TV shows and tried to send telepathic thoughts to the actors on screen, then whatever it was they did next you chose to interpret as a clue that they were receiving your thoughts.

Example: Watching an old re-run of Neighbours, you try to make Madge think of the number 5. In the next shot, Madge then, say, picks up a coffee mug. You think "I used to have a set of coffee mugs and then one got broken so then there were only 5".

That's the sort of really not at all useful evidence I'm imagining. I expect to be wrong on the details, but I suspect I'm pretty close on the basic technique.
 
Michel H said:
The hints are for you (members of this forum), they are not for the people who took part in my recent telepathy experiments with Australia.

The question I am asking the members of this forum is:
Why method, or which technique, which technology did I use in my recent telepathy experiments with Australia ("the opposite side of the world" for me, although the Earth is spherical of course)

Hints: cam, I have some pictures, Judge Judy, people who seemed to react telepathically during the experiments were not necessarily all in Australia.
Click to expand...
Don't know.

Try me in NZ
 
Jack by the hedge said:
My guess is you watched some Australian TV shows and tried to send telepathic thoughts to the actors on screen, then whatever it was they did next you chose to interpret as a clue that they were receiving your thoughts.

Example: Watching an old re-run of Neighbours, you try to make Madge think of the number 5. In the next shot, Madge then, say, picks up a coffee mug. You think "I used to have a set of coffee mugs and then one got broken so then there were only 5".

That's the sort of really not at all useful evidence I'm imagining. I expect to be wrong on the details, but I suspect I'm pretty close on the basic technique.
Click to expand...
This an interesting idea, Jack: I could have watched a live newscast of Australian TV, and try to telepathically influence the anchor, and watch for any reaction (I have modified your suggestion a little; the broadcast has to be live because I'm investigating telepathy, not psychokinesis on past events).
However, there is a problem: Australia is very far away, and I ain't got Australia among my TV channels.

I think I'll add "internet" to the list of hints. So now, my question becomes:

Which method, or which technique, which technology did I use in my recent telepathy experiments with Australia ("the opposite side of the world" for me, although the Earth is spherical of course)

Hints: cam, internet, I have some pictures, Judge Judy, people who seemed to react telepathically during the experiments were not necessarily all in Australia.

Please keep on answering.
 
Michel H said:
So now, my question becomes:

Which method, or which technique, which technology did I use in my recent telepathy experiments with Australia ("the opposite side of the world" for me, although the Earth is spherical of course)
Click to expand...

Am I the only one who suspects that Michel H will fail to see that everyone's inability to answer this question is rather strong evidence that the rest of the world can not hear his thoughts?

Dave
 
fromdownunder said:
It is fun to see him post "yes I was thinking of that as well" type responses to just about anything other people say, so it would not surprise me if he claims that he was thinking of these shows and that is why I selected these two.
Click to expand...


Oh my god, he did:


Michel H said:
Hints: cam, I have some pictures, Judge Judy, people who seemed to react telepathically during the experiments were not necessarily all in Australia.
Click to expand...
 
Loss Leader said:
Oh my god, he did:
...
Click to expand...
Actually, I added the Judge Judy hint only after I saw fromdownunder alluding to her. I thought it was a little relevant, and it's never a bad thing to add a judge to your hints ...

Which method, or which technique, which technology did I use in my recent telepathy experiments with Australia ("the opposite side of the world" for me, although the Earth is spherical of course)?

Hints: cam, internet, I have some pictures, Judge Judy, people who seemed to react telepathically during the experiments were not necessarily all in Australia.

Please keep on answering.
 
Michel H said:
Hints: cam, internet, I have some pictures, Judge Judy, people who seemed to react telepathically during the experiments were not necessarily all in Australia.
Click to expand...
I think I have it.

You telepathically influenced people on the internet, mostly but not all in Australia, to watch Ferris Bueller's Day Off. His best friend is Cameron, which Cam is short for. These people then decided to ditch school, and now they have to go in front of a Principal ("judge") to explain why they weren't at school.
 
My revised guess is you watched some Australian TV shows people via some Australia-based social media webcam thing and tried to send telepathic thoughts to the actors ordinary people on screen, then whatever it was they did next you chose to interpret as a clue that they were receiving your thoughts.

Like I said, I expected to be wrong about the detail. The only part which really matters is "whatever it was they did next you chose to interpret as a clue that they were receiving your thoughts", and I'm still pretty sure that bit will turn out to be correct, because that is what you consistently do.
 
Michel H said:
Which method, or which technique, which technology did I use in my recent telepathy experiments with Australia ("the opposite side of the world" for me, although the Earth is spherical of course)?
Click to expand...


Which method or technique did you use when you decided to manipulate 22,2 by multiplying the first two digit number in order to create a tens place and then dropping the last two into the ones place?

22+2=24. 22*2=44. 22 to the second power equals 484. 2 to the 22nd power is 419304. Also, dates are usually written with a slash and not a comma. 22/2 is 11. 2/22 is 0.090909...

And none of that is 42.
 
Michel H said:
Which method, or which technique, which technology did I use in my recent telepathy experiments with Australia ("the opposite side of the world" for me, although the Earth is spherical of course)?
Click to expand...

You thought something, something happened, and then you convinced yourself that if you hadn't thought the something, something else would have happened. That's the general case; anything more is just commentary.

Dave
 
Jack by the hedge said:
My revised guess is you watched some Australian TV shows people via some Australia-based social media webcam thing and tried to send telepathic thoughts to the actors ordinary people on screen, then whatever it was they did next you chose to interpret as a clue that they were receiving your thoughts.

Like I said, I expected to be wrong about the detail. The only part which really matters is "whatever it was they did next you chose to interpret as a clue that they were receiving your thoughts", and I'm still pretty sure that bit will turn out to be correct, because that is what you consistently do.
Click to expand...
Good and thank you, Jack by the hedge (for the first part of your answer, except for the negative connotation about my work of interpretation; DuvalHMFIC, I thank you for your answer, but I don't think your theory is correct).

I went to the website myfreecams.com, where webcam models can chat with visitors. An interesting feature of this (large) website is that you can select the geographical area you are interested in (they have a "filter by region", and you can select Australia for example, and then you'll see only models from Australia and New Zealand).

The typical experiment I usually do is this (I don't think this breaks any law of course; obviously I try to remain always discreet and polite in my behavior). I watch the (often very pretty) girl for some time, I watch her behavior: does she often type messages? does she touch her head a lot? how often does she talk? does she move her body a lot, or is she mostly immobile?

Then, after I feel I know her behavior pattern good enough, I pretend I kiss her on the screen of my laptop computer, and I carefully watch her reaction (I also study the reactions of other member, not only after pseudo-kissing [this is perhaps not very interesting], but also after my arrival in the room of the girl or lady).

I believe that I frequently observe quite remarquable reactions (for example, the girl might be touching her head after my pseudo-kissing, or say "hi Michael", or start writing strange things (for example "gjjfvkhjgf") or not, or shake her body a little, or reveal her body, or turn her camera off, and so on). When I feel there has been a good reaction, I often give a tip.

I frequently feel support from other (generally male) members (sometimes people can be nice), so that, if the girl does her "telepathic reaction" job well, she might get an avalanche of massive tips from people who have greater financial means than me, and this might be a strong motivating factor for her.

After I give the tip if she's done a "good job" (btw no nudity is indispensable in these experiments), I observe her reaction: does she treat me like just an anonymous stranger, who gives only a small or moderate tip, or does she treat me like a "special", or a "different" person" (note: "special" does not necessarily mean here better than any one else), who is giving the expected reward after she performed her "scientific duties" ?

If I am really somebody "special" (I recall: "special" doesn't mean "better"), I might expect that the girl might say a big thank you to me after a relatively small tip, and say no thank you to a financially more generous member who is not special (I believe I have observed such behavior). It seems to me the results of these experiments are often very spectacular, and I have been led to the conclusion that telepathic effects with Australia seem to be strong, in spite of the large distance. I have actually found no convincing distance effect so far, and this confirmed what fromdownunder once said:
fromdownunder said:
I can say in all honesty that yes, the distance effect of telepathy is exactly the same from 20 inches away as it is from 20,000 miles away.

Norm
Click to expand...
When I am doing these experiments, I constantly write all the things that take place, so I can re-read and reflect about it later (I also, from time to time, take screen captures).
 
Last edited:
Michel H said:
...
I went to the website myfreecams.com, where webcam models can chat with visitors.
Click to expand...

Oh dear...
The typical experiment I usually do is this...
Click to expand...
This is looking bad...
Then, after I feel I know her behavior pattern good enough, I pretend I kiss her on the screen of my laptop computer...
Click to expand...
Yup. Bad. Very bad...
I believe that I frequently observe quite remarquable reactions (for example, the girl might be touching her head after my pseudo-kissing, or say "hi Michael", or start writing strange things (for example "gjjfvkhjgf") or not, or shake her body a little, or reveal her body, or turn her camera off, and so on). When I feel there has been a good reaction, I often give a tip.
Click to expand...
You're porning wrong...
After I give the tip...
Click to expand...

Erm. It's not a tip. You're buying porn. Badly.

When I am doing these experiments, I constantly write all the things that take place, so I can re-read and reflect about it later (I also, from time to time, take screen captures).
Click to expand...

Yeah, I bet you do!
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom