Donn
Philosopher
Pron now? All the weird.
Merged New telepathy test: which number did I write ?
- Thread starter Michel H
- Start date
-
- Tags
- telepathy telepathy test
- Status
Moderator Agatha found the image in my post #2995 still not suitable for this forum, even after I edited it.
Rather than trying to appeal the decision (as she suggested), or trying to post a new edited image, I have instead asked a question http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=11284419#post11284419 requesting some information about the recent decisions.
Rather than trying to appeal the decision (as she suggested), or trying to post a new edited image, I have instead asked a question http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=11284419#post11284419 requesting some information about the recent decisions.
Daylightstar
Philosopher
Michel H, do you know what NSFW stands for?
ComfySlippers
Banned
Whilst it is nice to see you've found yourself a new hobby, I'd suggest you keep a little quieter about this particular one.
Loss Leader
I would save the receptionist., Moderator
Delete. Wrong thread.
Yes, I think so, it usually means "not safe for work", as far as I know. The wikipedia article about this says: "...Determining a site to be NSFW is invariably subjective, and poses challenges..."
The explanations provided by Agatha and Loss Leader have greatly clarified this issue in my mind (though I am still feeling a little concerned).
I had misunderstood that my original image in post #2995 was actually never deleted, but instead just wrapped in "not safe for work" tags (which is very different). So people could (and still can now) click on the tag to see the image. I guess I am perhaps still lacking a little experience on this forum.
But I am still a little concerned, because it seems to me some other people could make the same error as me, and misunderstand that they may see the image by clicking on the "not safe for work" tag. I found this red tag "NSFW=partial nudity from porn channel" a little scary, and I saw no "Click to view" message.
Other questions I have is: "May we (as members) add a NSFW tag (or 'wrap such tags') to an image?", and "Are we supposed to do it, in cases when it is 'necessary' ?" In addition, while I can accept the NSFW warning, I don't like the message: "partial nudity from porn channel" (there was really no nudity in my image, Kathryne was wearing a bra, and myfreecams is not really a "porn channel" [pornography involves sexual relations, in my opinion]).
Some time ago, I saw a girl who came to myfreecams.com just to sing for members, and chat with them, so was no nudity and even no sexuality involved.
I wonder if I could not use a "spoiler" tag, and add a message "WARNING: may not be suitable for work" myself, like this:
(WARNING: may not be suitable for work)
What do you think?
You may use the NSFW tags. You will notice that if you hide something in NSFW tags, what appears on the screen is "NSFW: show <whatever you put in the value field>.
If you use spoiler tags, this does not alert people to that what is inside the tags is an image which might get them into trouble if they are viewing at work. Therefore, if you insist on posting images which, while they might not breach rule 2 or rule 9, contain some elements of nudity, sex or violence or would otherwise not be suitable for somebody to view in their workplace, please use the nsfw tags and not the spoiler tags.
If you use spoiler tags, this does not alert people to that what is inside the tags is an image which might get them into trouble if they are viewing at work. Therefore, if you insist on posting images which, while they might not breach rule 2 or rule 9, contain some elements of nudity, sex or violence or would otherwise not be suitable for somebody to view in their workplace, please use the nsfw tags and not the spoiler tags.
Posted By: Agatha
Last edited by a moderator:
ComfySlippers
Banned
After a quick check I think that 222coins = approx $20.
The notion of you honestly believing you're paying real money to get girls to "sing" for you is weird.
I know you're trying to stay in character but, come on now, this porn diversion is weird even for you.
Heed AuntyAgatha's words if you really must share screen grabs of your new pastime.
I'd suggest not sharing it at all though tbh.
DuvalHMFIC
Graduate Poster
Yeah, I'd picked up on the character bit sometime ago, but found this whole porn thing odd, since it makes it rather obvious. Maybe he's gotten tired of this character?
Daylightstar
Philosopher
Why don't you also quote the Wiki entry on MyFreeCams:
The girl in your picture is displaying underwear, all in all which means it is not suitable for workplace.
"NSFW : Shows partial nudity from porn channel" looks about the right warning.
Last edited by a moderator:
Thank you for these explanations, Agatha. I'll try to remember them.
EHocking
Penultimate Amazing
He's obviously an Aussie from New South ******* Wales!
ComfySlippers
Banned
Electronic computing devices are an excellent tool for storing things you need to remember.
Things like the above and, I dunno, the results from your hundreds of very scientific "Guess-The-Number-Tests" maybe.
The same super-scientific results I asked you to share, the last time you did one of your super-scientific guessing games.
Now, if only you had access to such a computing device.
You may still answer. The test isn't over (I haven't given the correct answer yet), so I still keep repeating the target number from time to time, with some help and cooperation from my "voices".
Daylightstar
Philosopher
How should "Seven" be interpreted, as Michel H appears to believe that he does scientific experiments on porn chat girls who he 'pretends to kiss' on his laptop screen?
ComfySlippers
Banned
Edited by Agatha:
Deleted breach of rule 9. Please remember to avoid gratuitous sexual references in the public sections.
Last edited by a moderator:
Ron Swanson
Illuminator
fixed below
Last edited:
- Status