• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

What will happen at the Democratic Convention?

What will happen at the Democratic Convention?

  • Hillary Clinton will be the nominee.

    Votes: 14 51.9%
  • Bernie Sanders will be the nominee.

    Votes: 8 29.6%
  • Vermin Supreme will be the nominee.

    Votes: 2 7.4%
  • Someone else will be the nominee.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Planet X will unleash their secret weapon - a 35 year old clone of Justin Trudeau who was born in Wa

    Votes: 3 11.1%
  • Other

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    27
  • Poll closed .
Those Democrats who voted for Dubya are also morons who made the country and the world a worse place.

And yet, there was zero introspection. The Democrats did not step back and go "Whoa. A third party got a sizeable chunk of the vote, and a bunch of our own party voted for Bush! Where did we go wrong?"
Nope! Instead their strategy was A) sue Nader everywhere to keep him off ballots, B) run a disinfo campaign to discourage people from voting for him, and C) run a hawk against Bush.

It wasn't successful, and Bush got re-elected, but hey! At least Nader didn't win!

Fear of what? Trump. I'm glad he's the likely nominee. The Republicans couldn't have picked a more unelectable candidate (well maybe Ted Cruz).

So, um, Trump is unelectable, yet somehow the Green Party is going to get him elected?
 
I don't really give a flying **** about Ralph Naders opinion. Without him and the morons that voted for him instead of Gore, we may not have had the absolutely disastrous Bush Presidency.
It's Nader's fault that Gore's bungled campaign couldn't win his own home state against Bush? And then so totally mismanaged the aftermath that although he had more votes than Bush in Florida conceded the state? And you blame the voters for voting for the candidate that best represented their policy views?
 
Last edited:
I'm afraid Sanders has burnt his Veep bridge with his angry personal attacks on Clinton's integrity.

Warren is still a possibility. People say her and Clinton don't get along but if you think about it, nominees pick Veeps based on simplistic numbers of getting this state or that state. Warren would get all those Sanders' supporters and then some. It would be an unbeatable ticket and it gets around the bridge Sanders burnt.

Clinton is smart. She has to know what an asset Warren would be. And given what a disaster Trump poses to the business world (think about it, he even scares the Kochs) a Clinton/Warren ticket shouldn't scare off the big campaign donors.

What makes you believe that Senator Warren would want to give up her Senate Seat to give Clinton support while getting nothing in return except a diminished standing among the public who support her?
 
What makes you believe that Senator Warren would want to give up her Senate Seat to give Clinton support while getting nothing in return except a diminished standing among the public who support her?

I really hope President Clinton the Second doesn't strip the Senate of senior Democrats like Barack Obama did in 2009. That contributed to the fiasco of 2010.
 
And yet, there was zero introspection. The Democrats did not step back and go "Whoa. A third party got a sizeable chunk of the vote, and a bunch of our own party voted for Bush! Where did we go wrong?"
Nope! Instead their strategy was A) sue Nader everywhere to keep him off ballots, B) run a disinfo campaign to discourage people from voting for him, and C) run a hawk against Bush.

It wasn't successful, and Bush got re-elected, but hey! At least Nader didn't win!



So, um, Trump is unelectable, yet somehow the Green Party is going to get him elected?

That's why a lot of us loathe Nader -he put what he wanted to do over electing a not-republicker. He was an idiot wanting his way and he stole enough wasted votes to get Bush the idiot brother elected -again. Too many politicians do not look at the big picture and think they actually mean something.
 
What makes you believe that Senator Warren would want to give up her Senate Seat to give Clinton support while getting nothing in return except a diminished standing among the public who support her?

Depends on how badly she wants to save the country from republicker's fears and evildoing due to those fears.

That would be fears that poorer people and middle class people might get lower cost health care - including medicine, that all public schools would receive all the resources they actually need to be able to educate and turn out good students ready to work and/or move up to higher education, that educational daycare and meals for the younger children would be free and of good quality - just for starters.
 
Depends on how badly she wants to save the country from republicker's fears and evildoing due to those fears.

That would be fears that poorer people and middle class people might get lower cost health care - including medicine, that all public schools would receive all the resources they actually need to be able to educate and turn out good students ready to work and/or move up to higher education, that educational daycare and meals for the younger children would be free and of good quality - just for starters.

You seem to be saying that it depends entirely upon how much she believes the fanatical morons on the left proclaiming that Savior Hillary is the only one who can save this nation from the great Satan that is Trump. I tend to agree, hopefully, she is smarter than that, if not, it is better to find out now.
 
You seem to be saying that it depends entirely upon how much she believes the fanatical morons on the left proclaiming that Savior Hillary is the only one who can save this nation from the great Satan that is Trump. I tend to agree, hopefully, she is smarter than that, if not, it is better to find out now.

That's you second use of "fanatical morons... left" in your past couple of posts. The fanatical morons are going to Philadelphia to take over the convention for Bernie and planned as of last week to register twenty million new voters to push him over the top in November, whether he wants to run or not.

The fanatical morons are calling Bernie and Elizabeth Warren "traitor".

What you are referring to as fanatical morons are people who disagree with you. Felt the Bern, did you? Us fanatical morons have been calmly laying out our plan to stop the GOP. It happens to be Trump. It could be Carson or Cruz or Rubio.... it's the Republican Party that needs to be stopped.
 
...What you are referring to as fanatical morons are people who disagree with you...

That statement wasn't first used by me, and seems quite subjective. If you find it offensive, perhaps you should have directed your comment to the ones employing it to attack others personally, something I have yet to do.

Personally, I believe there is more than enough room under the banner of "fanatical morons on the left" for both the Bernie Bros and the clutch of "get out of her way, it's her turn," Hillarites. (especially since I don't consider myself as a member of either group, and since I've never considered you, or most others here on the left, Democratic or otherwise, to be such examples, I'm not really sure why you take offense when I talk about some of the idiots on the left).
 
That statement wasn't first used by me, and seems quite subjective. If you find it offensive, perhaps you should have directed your comment to the ones employing it to attack others personally, something I have yet to do.

Personally, I believe there is more than enough room under the banner of "fanatical morons on the left" for both the Bernie Bros and the clutch of "get out of her way, it's her turn," Hillarites. (especially since I don't consider myself as a member of either group, and since I've never considered you, or most others here on the left, Democratic or otherwise, to be such examples, I'm not really sure why you take offense when I talk about some of the idiots on the left).

I don't find the term offensive. I am a proud member of the lunatic left. Have been for decades.

I just find your repeated use of the terms curious. Words have meanings. I remember hearing a great line in A Hard Day's Night.... something along the lines of "take your pimply hyperbole". Great put-down. I've been dying to use it for fifty years, but the actual opportunity has not arisen because.... words have meanings.

"Fanatical" and "left" do not fit when you're describing the group that those of the fanatical left consider to be Republican Lite, Corporatist Democrats, Far Too Conservative, Tools of Wall Street, etc... Particularly when you've got Bernie Crazies who are insisting this ain't over 'til it's over, turning on Bernie for endorsing Hillary, calling Elizabeth Warren a traitor for stumping for her, etc...

Frankly, it sounds like you coined a phrase you like using, but you haven't found anyone to apply it to. The action you're describing, appealing to all left and left-ish voters to vote their self-serving interests and stop the GOP, is a calm, cool, thought out strategy. It is well short of "fanatical", and quite far from "left". Whether it's moronic or not depends. Meh? I've never self-identified as a Republican and think that hatred of the New GOP is quite sane, intelligent and logical.
 
The Dems will have A-list speakers (Scott Baio? Seriously?); will have a positive message and be united; Bernie, Barack, and Michelle will give a hell of a speech (Hillary will do OK), and the bounce the Dems get out of their convention will be permanent.

Oh, and nobody will plagiarize anything.
 
The Dems will have A-list speakers (Scott Baio? Seriously?); will have a positive message and be united; Bernie, Barack, and Michelle will give a hell of a speech (Hillary will do OK), and the bounce the Dems get out of their convention will be permanent.

Oh, and nobody will plagiarize anything.
Don't forget Bill, Joe, and Elizabeth.
 
...snip...

Oh, and nobody will plagiarize anything.

Wouldn't be surprised if we see Obama or Michelle referencing it for a joke, they both have the skill to do it in regards to public speaking. Mind you that will only be playing to the crowd as it will have no effect at all on the mainstream Trump supporters.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom