• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Bullish on Bernie: The Bernie Sanders 2016 Thread II

At least to the DNC chair Ms. Wasserman Shultz. A conspiracy implies that there is something sneaky and hidden about the process, much of this (including Bill's campaigning in polling places without incarceration) has been pretty open regarding the DNC leadership and who they prefer as well as how they are tilting the field to insure that their candidate has as easy a time as they can make it taking the nomination, even if they have to bend a rule or break a law.

A few examples over the last year.

Is the Democratic Party Rigging the Election for Hillary Clinton?
http://www.vice.com/read/the-democratic-party-hillary-clinton-bias-goes-way-beyond-data

Sign Robert Reich's petition: Tell the DNC to stop blocking Bernie's voter file access NOW - http://act.democracyforamerica.com/sign/dnc_sanders_van?akid=s111591..I3lm1f

Ex-Obama adviser: DNC appears to be 'putting finger on scale' for Clinton
http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box...iser-on-sanders-scandal-dnc-putting-finger-on

'Impartial' DNC finance chief helps Hillary
Fundraising assistance in Texas flouts presidential primary neutrality rules
http://www.politico.com/story/2015/06/impartial-dnc-finance-chief-helps-hillary-clinton-118558

Debbie Does Damage: ‘The Sanders Campaign Doesn’t Have Anything Other Than Bluster’ To Stand On [VIDEO]
http://dailycaller.com/2015/12/18/d...than-bluster-to-stand-on-video/#ixzz45HL060ls

D.N.C. Officer Says She Was Disinvited From Debate After Calling for More of Them - http://www.nytimes.com/politics/fir...d-from-debate-after-calling-for-more-of-them/

Senior state Democratic official compares DNC to ‘dictatorship’
https://www.bostonglobe.com/news/po...ictatorship/fbfonfjnDLQzhh3G2TdJvJ/story.html

many more, but I'm sure you were already aware of all this.

tl;dr
 
This is a classic pot and kettle scenario. The truth is that Sanders is as much of a dove as another senator that campaigned against Hillary based on their opposition to the Iraq war.

Not according to his record or statements.

Neither the Colonel nor anyone else I know has called Sanders a Dove. Sanders is not opposed to the use of military force when it is necessary, he just doesn't believe it should be the first, or is the best, Diplomatic tool to use for every international (or domestic) issue. It should always be the last option used. Too many U.S. politicians are seduced by having a big hammer and every problem and frustration around the world starts looking like nails to them.
 
Cute. Continue to ignore the elephant in the room that is the actual count.

Elephant? there you go exposing your inner conservative again!

Hillary started out with more than 350 delegates before the primaries even started, Clinton's delegate lead has, in general, been coming down since then, very few of the most populous states have voted yet and those that have, split the vote fairly evenly. The longer the contest has continued the greater the margin of Sanders' wins and the less of a lead Clinton has been able to hang onto. The only question now is if this trend will continue to accelerate, and if it will be sufficient to overcome Clinton's initial lead.

I'm not ignoring the braying donkey, I just am not convinced that her lead is insurmountable.
 
Elephant? there you go exposing your inner conservative again!

Hillary started out with more than 350 delegates before the primaries even started, Clinton's delegate lead has, in general, been coming down since then, very few of the most populous states have voted yet and those that have, split the vote fairly evenly. The longer the contest has continued the greater the margin of Sanders' wins and the less of a lead Clinton has been able to hang onto. The only question now is if this trend will continue to accelerate, and if it will be sufficient to overcome Clinton's initial lead.

I'm not ignoring the braying donkey, I just am not convinced that her lead is insurmountable.

This is what keeps it entertaining!!!

:dl:
 
People might also want to see what author Caitlin R. Keirnan has to say:

I watched Facebook "friends" "unfriend" me because I've finally had enough of not saying what I think about Sanders and his cult of personality for fear of...well...pretty much what's happening because I've finally started saying what I think about Sanders and his cult of personality.

http://greygirlbeast.livejournal.com/1181693.html
 
Elephant? there you go exposing your inner conservative again!

Hillary started out with more than 350 delegates before the primaries even started, Clinton's delegate lead has, in general, been coming down since then, very few of the most populous states have voted yet and those that have, split the vote fairly evenly. The longer the contest has continued the greater the margin of Sanders' wins and the less of a lead Clinton has been able to hang onto. The only question now is if this trend will continue to accelerate, and if it will be sufficient to overcome Clinton's initial lead.

I'm not ignoring the braying donkey, I just am not convinced that her lead is insurmountable.

And yet again, I don't know how you are getting these numbers. Before the primaries started, Clinton had a lead of 350 super delegates alone. She now has a lead of 438 super delegates, which is up from then, not down. Clinton also currently has a lead of 212 pledged delegates, for a total delegate lead of 650.

As far as the most populous states, Texas and Florida are the 2 highest that have voted, and they both went decisively to Clinton: Texas with +32 points, and Florida +31.1 points. This is followed by IL that was close, then OH where Clinton was +13.8, and GA where Clinton was +43.1. In fact, out of the top 5 most populous states that have voted, Clinton has blown Sanders out with double digits in 4.
 
...

Hillary started out with more than 350 delegates before the primaries even started, Clinton's delegate lead has, in general, been coming down since then, very few of the most populous states have voted yet and those that have, split the vote fairly evenly. The longer the contest has continued the greater the margin of Sanders' wins and the less of a lead Clinton has been able to hang onto. The only question now is if this trend will continue to accelerate, and if it will be sufficient to overcome Clinton's initial lead. ...
So she was ahead in superdelegates before the voting started. And now you leave the superdelegates out of the equation and declare Clinton's lead is shrinking? :boggled:

Are you drunk posting?
 
People might also want to see what author Caitlin R. Keirnan has to say:

http://greygirlbeast.livejournal.com/1181693.html


"I believe in the Democratic Party and the principles and values it represents and recognize and cherish the advances it has fostered. And it makes me ill watching Sanders' disingenuous, opportunistic attempt to use it as a stepping stone to the presidency. Sanders and his supporters are cynically employing the Democratic Party the way that a cuckoo employs the nests of other species of birds, the same way that Trump is using the Republican Party. This is the Year of the American Cuckoo." -- Caitlin R. Keirnan

According to Ms. Keirnan, Sanders and Trump are basically just unwelcome interlopers; spoilers that are interfering with what otherwise would have been a Jeb Bush or Hillary Clinton presidency. And presumably, that's a very bad thing. Well, "one man's heaven is another man's hell", as the saying goes.
 
"I believe in the Democratic Party and the principles and values it represents and recognize and cherish the advances it has fostered. And it makes me ill watching Sanders' disingenuous, opportunistic attempt to use it as a stepping stone to the presidency. Sanders and his supporters are cynically employing the Democratic Party the way that a cuckoo employs the nests of other species of birds, the same way that Trump is using the Republican Party. This is the Year of the American Cuckoo." -- Caitlin R. Keirnan

According to Ms. Keirnan, Sanders and Trump are basically just unwelcome interlopers; spoilers that are interfering with what otherwise would have been a Jeb Bush or Hillary Clinton presidency. And presumably, that's a very bad thing. Well, "one man's heaven is another man's hell", as the saying goes.

Choice and democracy are evil! Long live dynasties!
 
Elephant? there you go exposing your inner conservative again!

Hillary started out with more than 350 delegates before the primaries even started, Clinton's delegate lead has, in general, been coming down since then, very few of the most populous states have voted yet and those that have, split the vote fairly evenly. The longer the contest has continued the greater the margin of Sanders' wins and the less of a lead Clinton has been able to hang onto. The only question now is if this trend will continue to accelerate, and if it will be sufficient to overcome Clinton's initial lead.

I'm not ignoring the braying donkey, I just am not convinced that her lead is insurmountable.

Trying not to make this a habit, the only excuse I have is a few days where I have only managed to get a few hours sleep due to the pain of a slipped disk pinching the nerves which service my left arm. This series of posts from last night was not due to any intoxicant other than the lack of sleep and a type of persistent pain that I am not used to. Today I do have meds onboard, enough to reduce the pain and see clearly what the last few days have wrought upon my reasoning skills.

I, again apologize to all, and will refrain from posting much at all until after this physical issue which is obviously affecting my mental capacities more seriously than I have understood till now, has been resolved.
 
Trying not to make this a habit, the only excuse I have is a few days where I have only managed to get a few hours sleep due to the pain of a slipped disk pinching the nerves which service my left arm. This series of posts from last night was not due to any intoxicant other than the lack of sleep and a type of persistent pain that I am not used to. Today I do have meds onboard, enough to reduce the pain and see clearly what the last few days have wrought upon my reasoning skills.

I, again apologize to all, and will refrain from posting much at all until after this physical issue which is obviously affecting my mental capacities more seriously than I have understood till now, has been resolved.

Damn, man. I hope you recover soon! That sounds miserable.

See if your doc can prescribe you a TENS machine. These really help with back pain in my experience.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom