AE911 Webinars

ProBonoShill said:
Well that's just pathetic and sad, but I'm sure Gage appreciates you funding his vacations around the world.
Click to expand...
You are entitled to your opinion.

Most of the day has passed, and not one person has posted a question that they would like me to ask.
 
FalseFlag said:
You are entitled to your opinion.

Most of the day has passed, and not one person has posted a question that they would like me to ask.
Click to expand...

All 911 truth claims are self-debunking. The nuts fooled by 911 truth, have no clue the claims are dumbed down lies.

You should ask the questions you want. Are you unable to make up some rational question to the biggest 911 truth liar in history, Richard Gage. Oops, you are right, how can you ask a rational question, Richard Gage has no rational claims.
 
Week 4 - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ILwx0BLmHAM

In regards to answering questions - I asked a question about the WTC7 evaluation project. They did not answer my question, but you can clearly hear them say that they would not answer questions about WTC7 in this particular presentation. This means they did read my question, but they chose not to derail their presentation with another subject. I will ask the question again when the subject of WTC7 comes up in the next series of webinars.
 
FalseFlag said:
Week 1 - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7pOPkbJLr7Y
Week 2 - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eg5SUhEs7Jc
Week 3 - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MCSEDSSxdNs
Click to expand...

FalseFlag said:
Week 4 - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ILwx0BLmHAM

In regards to answering questions - I asked a question about the WTC7 evaluation project. They did not answer my question, but you can clearly hear them say that they would not answer questions about WTC7 in this particular presentation. This means they did read my question, but they chose not to derail their presentation with another subject. I will ask the question again when the subject of WTC7 comes up in the next series of webinars.
Click to expand...

Nobody cares.
 
DGM said:
That's not fair. There has to be somebody or YouTube wouldn't bother hosting it.........:D
Click to expand...

:D

I wonder why the evil gubmint hasn't shut down YouTube yet and stopped all the warriors of 911truth from exposing their evil deeds.

Maybe they just haven't got around to it yet. ;)
 
FalseFlag said:
In regards to answering questions - I asked a question about the WTC7 evaluation project. They did not answer my question, but you can clearly hear them say that they would not answer questions about WTC7 in this particular presentation. This means they did read my question, but they chose not to derail their presentation with another subject. I will ask the question again when the subject of WTC7 comes up in the next series of webinars.
Click to expand...

No it doesn't.

It just means they were not answering questions on the topic you selected for your question - as shocking as it is that you would go off-topic. Does not in any way state or imply anyone saw, let alone read your question.
 
Mark F said:
No it doesn't.

It just means they were not answering questions on the topic you selected for your question - as shocking as it is that you would go off-topic. Does not in any way state or imply anyone saw, let alone read your question.
Click to expand...

OK.

Claim - a skeptic will argue with a truther over everything, regardless of its importance. The skeptic will always take the opposite position the truther does, regardless of what that position is.

Proof - From the quoted post, "It just means they were not answering questions on the topic you selected for your question - as shocking as it is that you would go off-topic. Does not in any way state or imply anyone saw, let alone read your question."
 
FalseFlag said:
Lurkers, please take note. This is clear evidence that skeptics do not wanted to be presented with any information that conflicts with their delusions.
Click to expand...


http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=174815

lurkers_zpspwmlnkm4.jpg


Good luck with that :)
 
Ha Ha If this was the average engineering population then for every 5 truthers there would be 2,500 debunkers

Maybe it shows that debunkers don't really care
 
Ape of Good Hope said:
You're not 'posting' when you click a poll button.

Can't you get anything right?
Click to expand...

You can't vote without registering to be a member of this forum.

You are just playing another one of your games. A lurker is someone who is not a member. You don't need to be a member to view the posts in this forum. If you are a member, you are no longer a lurker. If you are a member and you don't post, you are simply a member who does not post. You are no longer a lurker.
 
FalseFlag said:
You can't vote without registering to be a member of this forum.

You are just playing another one of your games. A lurker is someone who is not a member. You don't need to be a member to view the posts in this forum. If you are a member, you are no longer a lurker. If you are a member and you don't post, you are simply a member who does not post. You are no longer a lurker.
Click to expand...


Semantastic!


I wonder if any lurkers will be motivated to come out of the woodwork and support you in your efforts here.

Mind you, if I was a lurker, and I saw the difficulty you're having understanding simple concepts like steel weakening in fire, I'd be too gobsmacked to post.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom