tsig
a carbon based life-form
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2005
- Messages
- 39,049
guns or butter
Johnson assured us we could have guns and butter. He never explained how to spread butter with a gun though.
guns or butter
Not true; he joined the SS in 1940. He had been convinced that doing so was the only way he would be allowed to continue rocket development. He received his last promotion in the SS hierarchy in 1943. He was also a member of the Nazi party, beginning in 1939. The broad view of the evidence suggests he never looked at these memberships as anything other than requirements of the circumstances in which he found himself, in order to continue his work.
Johnson assured us we could have guns and butter. He never explained how to spread butter with a gun though.
You can use the weapon's butt but good taste and etiquette demands that that be done with margarine only. Butter may be splattered but never spread with a gun. Only a complete rube would do so.
You can use the weapon's butt but good taste and etiquette demands that that be done with margarine only. Butter may be splattered but never spread with a gun. Only a complete rube would do so.
one of these things is not like the others...
I was picturing a wall with an entire loaf's worth of Wonder Bread slices secured to it and a sawed-off double-barrel loaded with a quarter pound of Land O' Lakes in each barrel.
'Murica!
Johnson assured us we could have guns and butter. He never explained how to spread butter with a gun though.
Not true; he joined the SS in 1940. He had been convinced that doing so was the only way he would be allowed to continue rocket development. He received his last promotion in the SS hierarchy in 1943.
So, I would say that Von Braun was an auxiliary member of the SS.
The Moon hoax is so much larger than anything that has ever been perpetrated. By proving that one, I think you establish a very good starting point for those who need to open their eyes a little bit to see what’s going on.
One thing that 9/11 truthers and those who research false flag operations of all kinds are very hesitant to do is to question the Apollo Moon missions. So it will also be interesting to see how members of the Truth Movement react to Mazzucco taking on this subject. While there are a fair number of truthers who don’t believe we went to the Moon, many are afraid that admitting this will hurt their credibility.
You can use the weapon's butt but good taste and etiquette demands that that be done with margarine only. Butter may be splattered but never spread with a gun. Only a complete rube would do so.

That's... You... Listen, just butt out.
Correct, he was an officer in the Allgemeine-SS. Thanks for clarifying your meaning.
Not if you did not enjoy the first one . .A rebuttal would be better.
Specifically in one case, he offers the prize for someone who can prove that Apollo carried enough fuel to perform the advertised orbital maneuvers. Of course that was done, but Anders objects because it wasn't figured according to his broken model of physics.
Is there really any question? He constantly brings up the million-euro prize and thumps his chest over the fact that no one has won it, but steadfastly refuses to demonstrate via any of the customary means (e.g., authenticated escrow) that the money exists. Naturally no one takes the prize seriously; they correct him simply to put the corrects on the record. But Anders is the one who keeps taunting people with the money.
That's the ultimate joke in his approach. Anders is the sole judge of whether or not he has been corrected, and therefore the sole judge of whether anyone is owed a million euros. He corrects his errors (see below) but he simply refuses to admit that he was ever wrong.
Clearly he doesn't understand the mechanical energy of orbits, but the fact remains that he originally computed the delta-v problem one way, omitting the variable-mass term of the Tsiolkovsky ideal-rocket equation, but agreed that he should be computing it a different way and refused to admit that he had been corrected.
Not only did he refuse to acknowledge the error he corrected, he blatantly libeled a member of Apollohoax in the process. It's an epic ad hominem that would be appropriate only in the Stundie thread, if even there.
I don't think its possible to ever prove to a conspiracy theorist that their theories are delusions- for one thing, they will dismiss all evidence that discredits them as being fake.
Plus the burden of proof is on THEM to back their claims- something they don't get, as CTs reject the scientific method