• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Ed Should Australia change its flag?

Should Australia change its flag?

  • I'm an Aussie and I say Yes!

    Votes: 13 24.5%
  • I'm an Aussie and I say No!

    Votes: 5 9.4%
  • I'm an Aussie and I say mind your own *********** business!

    Votes: 2 3.8%
  • I'm not an Aussie but I say Yes!

    Votes: 8 15.1%
  • I'm not an Aussie but I say No!

    Votes: 6 11.3%
  • On Planet X flags are for sandcastles

    Votes: 19 35.8%

  • Total voters
    53
I don't have any strong opinions on our flags, but my god we need to change the rubbish national anthem.
 
Of the choices I can see why Southern Horizon is preferred. The others are hideous, except for Southern Cross (lower right) which is the one I'd vote for.

[qimg]http://i1233.photobucket.com/albums/ff387/AJM8125/alternative-australian-flags-data.jpg[/qimg]

Southern Horizon is quite ugly as well. Only the Southern Cross is something I wouldn't be ghastly ashamed of if it were my flag.

What's with these "lets make our flag as ugly as we can" in the region anyway? New Zeeland had a competition and also presented their voters with rather terrible choices.

McHrozni
 
Southern Horizon is quite ugly as well. Only the Southern Cross is something I wouldn't be ghastly ashamed of if it were my flag.

What's with these "lets make our flag as ugly as we can" in the region anyway? New Zeeland had a competition and also presented their voters with rather terrible choices.

McHrozni

I like our choice.

All class like. No wot I meen?

Sent from my GT-S5660 using Tapatalk 2
 
New Zealand may have a unicaramel system...
That sounds delicious, but I think the word you're looking for is "unicameral". :D

Yup, but like the flag, the arguments about an anthem will be ridiculous.
I, like you, am old enough to remember the last time we changed the national anthem - from "God Save The Queen". I still think of it as the "new" national anthem. When I learned it, it began "Australia's sons let us rejoice..."
 
A kangaroo, rampant.

Wearing a hat with corks hanging from it.
Perhaps with a pouch full of ice with a couple of tinnies of 4X sticking out.

You're welcome, mates.
 
That sounds delicious, but I think the word you're looking for is "unicameral". :D

I, like you, am old enough to remember the last time we changed the national anthem - from "God Save The Queen". I still think of it as the "new" national anthem. When I learned it, it began "Australia's sons let us rejoice..."

And many hear "Australians all are ostriches". Probably better. I'd rather a piss-take anthem than the dirge we have to tolerate.
 
Why not just go with the Eureka flag?

It's already familiar to many Australians, it has historical significance, ........

That was essentially an Ireland Vs England fixture played away from home. I know it's big in Aus (Victoria in particular), but that wouldn't be an incident that I would choose to celebrate in a national symbol. It's very exclusive, too, referencing only animosity between 2 groups of whites.

On the bigger question: break links with Britain first, then the flag will just naturally follow. It would seem odd to do it in the reverse order.
 
That was essentially an Ireland Vs England fixture played away from home. I know it's big in Aus (Victoria in particular), but that wouldn't be an incident that I would choose to celebrate in a national symbol. It's very exclusive, too, referencing only animosity between 2 groups of whites.

On the bigger question: break links with Britain first, then the flag will just naturally follow. It would seem odd to do it in the reverse order.

The whole Eureka event was a fiasco. A few hundred miners refusing to pay a legal tax. Leading to a siege and a handful of deaths. It wasn't the birth of democracy in Australia, it was the birth of self-interested insurrection.

The Eureka flag will never be Australia's.
 
On the bigger question: break links with Britain first, then the flag will just naturally follow. It would seem odd to do it in the reverse order.
This is my opinion too. I'll repeat here that there is no serious proposal on the table right now to actually change Australia's flag. Not one that I'm aware of, anyway.
 
Don't forget that Australia had a "mean and tricky" monarchist for a PM at the time and made sure that the model that got put to a vote would be too controversial to pass.

I was thinking more of the scare tactics he used to deter people from accepting it, such as scary advertisements warning people of the huge number of "untested" changes to the constitution. Most of them were just word-replacement, such as changing "commonwealth" to "republic", or changing "governor general" to "president", ect.

And trying to get people outraged by the fact that the "president" wouldn't be elected directly by the public, even though the same position, currently under the name of "governor general", isn't directly elected by the public either.

Because there's an unwritten rule that says a country's 'national colors' must be on their flag, right? But what about the national bird, or the national sport, or the national emblem, or... Shouldn't they all be on the flag?

Personally, I don't really understand the point of these things.

For example, we currently don't have a national bird. But if we did, what difference would it make? If we made the emu our national bird, how would our lives be any different than before? How would it make any difference if we picked the kookaburra as our national bird instead?
 
1 we don't need a new flag
2 we need another tier of politics (president) like we need a second anus
3 If people don,t like the fact that we timeshare a monarch with other countries then why not just get exclusive use of one. There has got to be a surplus royal family somewhere that would like the job

4 we should have a new national anthem every year like the JJJ top 100


Apart from those few issues every thing here is hunky dory

Except for our appalling rugby record against the all blacks
 
That sounds delicious, but I think the word you're looking for is "unicameral". :D

I, like you, am old enough to remember the last time we changed the national anthem - from "God Save The Queen". I still think of it as the "new" national anthem. When I learned it, it began "Australia's sons let us rejoice..."

That's the problem with spellcheck, it never tells you if you're using a valid but completely out of place word.:)
 

Back
Top Bottom