In general, the more complex the shape the greater the cost of making the flag.
Another
It'll be appropriate when we adopt John Williamson's "True Blue" as the new National Anthem
I dont much care about colours, but if it doesnt contain the words "I blew out a plugga" it isnt Australian.
I've literally never heard that term in my life.
Tell me more about the NZ caramel system.
Do the original references to Scotland and Ireland not offend, then? And, of course, in 1879 all Australians were also as British as anyone else in the Empire.So we are going to pretend the Australian voters weren't conned into agreeing to a sycophantic paen to old England.
I was actually taught in school (keep in mind this was thirty years ago) that our sporting colours were green and gold, but our national colours are blue and gold.
It's not that complex, just two solid shapes with irregular outlines.
Compare it to the vastly more complex designs of the flags of countries such as Afghanistan, Sri Lanka or Fiji, just as a few randomly selected examples.
http://www.worldatlas.com/webimage/flags/countrys/mideast/afganist.htm
http://www.worldatlas.com/webimage/flags/countrys/asia/srilanka.htm
http://www.worldatlas.com/webimage/flags/countrys/pacific/fiji.htm
Quickly checking Wikipedia, I see that the national colours officially became green and gold in 1984, and before that they were unofficially blue and gold. Although, green-and-gold used for sports long before they became our official colours.
Looks like even the exact shades of green and gold are explicitly specified.
Green: 348 C (pantone) or #008751 (hex)
Gold: 116 C (pantone) or #FCD116 (hex)
Guess I should adjust my proposed flag to match these exact colours:
![]()
Yes. Those are much more complex.
My point was merely that it is complex enough to add to the cost.
Is that how you see your country? Given Top and bottom of the world (North/South) are arbitrary don't you look at the world this way, with you rising to the top?