• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

80 Years of Subtle Sexism

This is why pink razors cost more. Men HAVE TO buy the pink razors so our spouses will not use our razors. It's not that we're selfish, it's that after women shave their women things, the razor is merciless on our man parts.

Retailers know we are willing to pay the PINK TAX and more, just for a reasonable shave.

It's a conspiracy I tell ya!
 
Buy Clotrimazole in a box labeled "for feminine itching" and another labeled "for jock itch" and see which one is more expensive.

Then buy the same thing in a tube labeled "for athlete's foot" and see you've both been suckered.

Good idea! Make them think "jock itch" is the only "masculine hygiene" issue.

They can never, ever know the unspeakable truth....
 
Good idea! Make them think "jock itch" is the only "masculine hygiene" issue.

They can never, ever know the unspeakable truth....

It's not unspeakable, just disgusting.
smackbottomcq3.gif
 
Buy Clotrimazole in a box labeled "for feminine itching" and another labeled "for jock itch" and see which one is more expensive.

Then buy the same thing in a tube labeled "for athlete's foot" and see you've both been suckered.

Silvadine from the podiatrist works better. Though I've never checked to see if parts are turning blue from the silver. ;) Ethylene glycol antifreeze works too, but it is either Neon Green or orange.
 
Should we split off a jock itch thread? Science or Social Issues?
 
Just continuing the thread drift for a moment longer, you can buy generic Clotrimazole for a buck a tube, and generic diphenhydramine (Benadryl) for as little as a couple of bucks a hundred (look for the "sleep aid") at Dollar General stores, among others.
 
How about taxing our periods?

Because tampons are a luxury.

It's a total fallacy that Value Added Tax only applies to "luxuries." We pay the same tax on toilet tissue and first aid products, for example. This difference is that it's the full 20% on those things, but a reduced rate of 5% on sanitary products.
 
Last edited:
FYI, that world view is a whole lot older than 80 years ago. Both the women's suffrage movement, and the temperance movement, in my country, had already achieved (among other things) votes for women and the prohibition by 1920. They were rooted in movements (and a response to the situation they confronted in society) quite a bit older than that.
 
It's a total fallacy that Value Added Tax only applies to "luxuries." We pay the same tax on toilet tissue and first aid products, for example. This difference is that it's the full 20% on those things, but a reduced rate of 5% on sanitary products.
That may well be true of VAT where you are, but here in the United States, sales tax is indeed biased in this way. As I think I mentioned before, where I am, almost anything that can be considered "medical" is tax exempt, and that includes such things as heating pads, adult diapers and condoms, but emphatically does not include tampons and the like.

Now of course this is a complex issue in some ways. I have heard vehement arguments from some feminist circles against the "medicalizing" of childbirth, so one could argue that it would be wrong to "medicalize" menstruation too, but one might also observe that handing this extremely common occurrence could fall under the heading of things necessary for a comfortable existence.

I suspect that something could be done here, and that even if it were arguable that women end up with a little advantage, that would not be such a terrible thing.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom