I think I have said this before, but the phenomenon is intriguing. On this topic, I think Jodie is sincere much in the same vein that Dean Radin is sincere in his beliefs. And like Radin, Jodie thinks that the mere act of acknowledging the existence of what amounts to confirmation bias in others makes her impervious to it. It is a supreme form of conceit.Oh yeah sure, those other people might not be too bright, but me I'm impervious to the sort of misperceptions that can afflict, you know, all other humans.
There's no bigfoot, but there's no BLAARGing. People really do believe the stuff they claim, they're just wrong about it.
I'm not wrong about mine though. I know what I saw.
I'm outdoorsy, 'cause I go fishing and I'm a smoker. I don't bother myself to know details of things like the range of mountain lions or what fishers are, but I know my wild critters for sure. I used to show cats, after all. So unlike all those other people to really do believe that they've seen something fantastic even though they're wrong about it, I saw something fantastic but I can't be wrong about it because I didn't know it was fantastic and I, you know, know what I saw.
This, on the other hand, is not sincere. It is flat out misrepresentation of the record and puts Jodie back in the gaming camp.Boy, you sure are sore about those posts I dug up in the BLAARG'ing thread aren't you?
It really is a shame as Jodie is obviously fairly intelligent, fairly well read, and in possession of a decent moral compass in some areas.

