The Big Dog
Unregistered
- Joined
- Jul 26, 2007
- Messages
- 29,742
If the whistleblower was all that concerned about the illegal activity, he'd put the information he has out there and let the chips fall where they may, NDA or no NDA. The fact that he hasn't leads me to believe he has nothing of any consequence. This, to me, smacks of someone with (at most) some peripheral knowledge trying to puff himself up.
He would? So you think he is a coward then?
It isn't that the Government of the United States of America demanded that he sign the NDA, the problem is that the guy who they forced to sign it won't violate it and let the "chips" fall where they may.