• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Ed clintonemails.com: Who is Eric Hoteham?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Avid readers know what? That you have snark?

12AX7's comment was a sequitur. I'm the one with the snark. My suggestion was facetious because I'm calling out the OP and his posse for what this thread really is all about. It's exactly what I said it is: a catchall whinging Hillary Hate Thread. The conveyance is wonderful, because "Whitewater? Heck there could've been emails about that in there!".... "And the guy at Breitbart knows a guy who knows an unnamed source that says there are emails in there about Hillary groping a jar-head in Bill's honor guard back in '95."

When people laugh, and they do laugh, the defense is "Well, we don't have the emails. So anything could be in there."
 
Have you made that suggestion to the Mods?

That insignificant derail was started by one of fmw's own compatriots (not blaming him, tho, it was fmw's who took the whining to the next level)

Cripes, he is still whining about how we have to leave Hillary alone?

Edited by Agatha: 
Edited breach of rule 0/12
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Now wait a minute. I thought no one knew what was on the server? How could anyone know whether Abedin's activity on the homebrew cowboyz server that no one has seen was lawful or not?

"no one"?

Hillary saw, Huma saw, and it sounds like a State department investigator that our government locked down with a non-disclosure agreement did too.

You can't spell transparency without "NDA"... oh wait....
 
OK...So this is not the smoking gun that will blow the case wide open then?

Sorry to keep asking. I'm just so excited to see it and I don't want to miss it when the moment comes.
 
"no one"?

Hillary saw, Huma saw, and it sounds like a State department investigator that our government locked down with a non-disclosure agreement did too.

You can't spell transparency without "NDA"... oh wait....

Right ... "If only I could tell you about all the evidence of illegal activity I saw, darn that NDA" ... :rolleyes:

IOW, avid readers know that there is still a big fat pile of NADA going on here.

But by all means, keep investigating. After all , tax dollars are free. Keep spending ...
 
Right ... "If only I could tell you about all the evidence of illegal activity I saw, darn that NDA" ... :rolleyes:

IOW, avid readers know that there is still a big fat pile of NADA going on here.

But by all means, keep investigating. After all , tax dollars are free. Keep spending ...

Fear of retribution didn't stop Snowden. It didn't stop Bradley Manning. It didn't stop Assange. But it did, apparently, stop this guy, whoever he is.
 
Right ... "If only I could tell you about all the evidence of illegal activity I saw, darn that NDA" ... :rolleyes:

IOW, avid readers know that there is still a big fat pile of NADA going on here.

But by all means, keep investigating. After all , tax dollars are free. Keep spending ...

Freedom is not free.

C'mon, I expect better arguments from you.

Hillary and Huma were playing games with putting Huma on two payrolls.

I get that some people don't care that the most transparent administration in history is locking down witnesses with NDA's. Stinks like a cover up to me.

By the way, you want to complain about tax dollars? Take a gander at the amount of work, litigation, and new investigations that have to occur because Hillary forgot to mention that she had tens of thousands of emails locked up in a cowboy server in a closet next to Bill's old collection of Hustler magazine.
 
Fear of retribution didn't stop Snowden. It didn't stop Bradley Manning. It didn't stop Assange. But it did, apparently, stop this guy, whoever he is.

:eek:

Is that supposed to justify the governments use of NDA's?

If so, it really, really, really does not.
 
Meh, there are no facts to argue. Just innuendo and conspiracy theory.

Of course there are facts to discuss, Huma's email address on Hill's cowboy server, Huma working for Teneo Holdings while on the payroll, the House Oversight Committee's interviews, the State departments history of using NDA's.

It all fits together
 
:eek:

Is that supposed to justify the governments use of NDA's?

If so, it really, really, really does not.

If the whistleblower was all that concerned about the illegal activity, he'd put the information he has out there and let the chips fall where they may, NDA or no NDA. The fact that he hasn't leads me to believe he has nothing of any consequence. This, to me, smacks of someone with (at most) some peripheral knowledge trying to puff himself up.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom