• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Latest Bigfoot "evidence"

Status
Not open for further replies.
You claim to have "HD video" from "15 feet" of more than one bigfoot, yet you won't share it with anyone. Such evidence would rock the world, and yet you keep it to yourself for ... some reason. My post was perfectly apt. You are telling tall tales. As ever, please produce the evidence and prove me wrong.

Why would I need to prove you wrong? I recall not caring whether you think they exist or not. So what's the motivation? I can't see it. Chris B.
 
Why would I need to prove you wrong? I recall not caring whether you think they exist or not. So what's the motivation? I can't see it. Chris B.

That's a great question Chris!
You offer nothing that contributes to the thread in the way of supporting evidence of your claims so what is the motivation of your posting.
 
Spare us the drama...
So you continue to post unsupported, rediculous claims and conjecture in a thread about evidence on a skeptical fourm.
All I'm suggesting is submit evidence of you're claims in the evidence thread or find/start another thread for your unsupportable, rediculous, conjecture and charming stories of your childhood.

I seem to remember responding to a specific post made by Shrike.

What you are attempting still is perfectly clear though. You are using the tactic of a relay of insults towards the footer hoping for a meltdown and subsequent departure from the forum rules leading to banishment of the footer.

That will not work in my case. We can either have an adult conversation and I know you are capable of having one, or we can throw down. I'm up for either.
Chris B.
 
That's a great question Chris!
You offer nothing that contributes to the thread in the way of supporting evidence of your claims so what is the motivation of your posting.

And you have offered what exactly to the thread?
Chris B.
 
Last edited:
And you have offered what exactly to the thread?
Chris B.
I'm not the one making unsupported claims of Bigfoot evidence...you are Chris!
Remember its the Bigfoot evidence thread your the proponent not me...try to stay focused and reality based Chris, again you have made claims that you can't support....remember....maybe you should review the thread alittle to refresh your memory ;)
 
That's kinda odd for you to say, I mean since you quoted my post and all. Seems you would not do that unless you craved my response?
Chris B.

Oh yes, absolutely.

I eagerly confess to liking the game. But I am not playing the "make him see there is no bigfoot game".

Skeptics like science, and this is a novel science area not really written about because science has generally dismissed bigfoot other than the few who play the game for money and pop culture notoriety.

The applicable science hasn't caught on to footers because it is viewed as a question of biology and not game-playing.
 
I'm not the one making unsupported claims of Bigfoot evidence...you are Chris!
Remember its the Bigfoot evidence thread your the proponent not me...try to stay focused and reality based Chris, again you have made claims that you can't support....remember....maybe you should review the thread alittle to refresh your memory ;)


He said he can support it. He has evidence. (so far we've heard descriptions of tracking over mile long trackways, He's observed bigfoot eating pine bark like cotton candy, he has saliva samples, hd video from 15 feet away from the creature, and other claimed photographic and video evidence) He just refuses to show it/prove it/reveal it. Because. Bigfoot. (sounds familiar?)
 
Last edited:
I'm not the one making unsupported claims of Bigfoot evidence...you are Chris!
Remember its the Bigfoot evidence thread your the proponent not me...try to stay focused and reality based Chris, again you have made claims that you can't support....remember....maybe you should review the thread alittle to refresh your memory ;)

I'll admit I was having a discussion with Shrike about a trackway and I have not produced pics to support the trackway. The discussion was theory and not evidence of proof.
You on the other hand, seem to like interjecting your two cents in for some reason. If that reason is not to participate in a current conversation, then what is it? Chris B.
 
I'll admit I was having a discussion with Shrike about a trackway and I have not produced pics to support the trackway. The discussion was theory and not evidence of proof.
You on the other hand, seem to like interjecting your two cents in for some reason. If that reason is not to participate in a current conversation, then what is it? Chris B.

Asking you to support your Bigfoot evidence claim in the Bigfoot evidence thread...again maybe you should review the thread a little you seem confused:eek:
 
Asking you to support your Bigfoot evidence claim in the Bigfoot evidence thread...again maybe you should review the thread a little you seem confused:eek:
I don't recall Shrike asking to see pics? Maybe I should review indeed to see if this is yet another case of "The skeptic making things up" routine.
Chris B.
 
He said he can support it. He has evidence. (so far we've heard descriptions of tracking over mile long trackways, He's observed bigfoot eating pine bark like cotton candy, he has saliva samples, hd video from 15 feet away from the creature, and other claimed photographic and video evidence) He just refuses to show it/prove it/reveal it. Because. Bigfoot. (sounds familiar?)

River, you can't even support your claims of hoaxing. You claim to have made stompers and left tracks in lots of areas. Can we see some pics? I mean pics you actually took of prints you actually made. Please don't paste more random stomper pics you pull from the internet like you did before. Those are easily identifiable as a fabrication. I don't know why someone hasn't called you on it before. I'm calling you out now. Show us your stuff if it exists. Can you prove what you've said is true?
Chris B.
 
River, you can't even support your claims of hoaxing. You claim to have made stompers and left tracks in lots of areas. Can we see some pics? I mean pics you actually took of prints you actually made. Please don't paste more random stomper pics you pull from the internet like you did before. Those are easily identifiable as a fabrication. I don't know why someone hasn't called you on it before. I'm calling you out now. Show us your stuff if it exists. Can you prove what you've said is true?
Chris B.


OK Chris. I've got a deal to make with you. If I post up my "proof" of what I claimed, will you post up your proof of claims as well? I can show you "HD video footage" of my claims, and however many photos you need as proof.

All you need to do is post up your HD video "from 15'" and saliva sample results, along with any other documentation you may have of this "family group" you witnessed, and pine bark eating, you know... the "extraordinary claims" you've made in the threads here.

Stompers exist, even mine. Bigfoot, not so much!

How about it Chris, lets put up or shut up. Post up, and I'll post up right after you. "I'm down" as you said earlier in the thread.
 
Last edited:
I don't recall Shrike asking to see pics? Maybe I should review indeed to see if this is yet another case of "The skeptic making things up" routine.
Chris B.

Again you seem confused....let me help you :)
You have made many claims from HD vid, pics of tracks, sightings, DNA and recent conjecture in regards to Bigfoot behavior in a thread titled Bigfoot evidence.
You have not supported your claims in anyway...just back up what your saying with supporting evidence or not...if not...maybe start your own thread along the lines of "Chris's Bigfoot Conjecture Corner" or get used to being called out everytime you post such nonsense in this thread :)
 
Last edited:
I don't recall Shrike asking to see pics? Maybe I should review indeed to see if this is yet another case of "The skeptic making things up" routine.
Chris B.

The pictures are as as imaginary as the poop you so desperately want to find. It goes without saying we would want said evidence instead of twenty posts about a possible future expedition to find imaginary dung.

Imaginary dung, really a good catch all for Bigfoot "evidence".
 
River, you can't even support your claims of hoaxing. You claim to have made stompers and left tracks in lots of areas. Can we see some pics? I mean pics you actually took of prints you actually made. Please don't paste more random stomper pics you pull from the internet like you did before. Those are easily identifiable as a fabrication. I don't know why someone hasn't called you on it before. I'm calling you out now. Show us your stuff if it exists. Can you prove what you've said is true?
Chris B.

His claim is believable, yours is not. Put up or shut up man, this is getting sad and I'm almost out of poop jokes. And i usually have quite the reserve.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom