Latest Bigfoot "evidence"

[John Nowak]

You know, I'm not shocked in the least that a Bigfooter has common knowledge of something as simple as tree riding while skeptics deny the concept even exists. LMAO This is rich indeed. Who was it that said "We're not a bunch of city slickers here". Oh God, my side is hurting. Chris B.

This does bring up the basic competence issue - you can't even report a thread correctly, and you're on the thread.

I know this isn't a unique observation; other people have called you on it.

 

[sadhatter]

No, you're off just a bit. I did not claim the Bigfoots were climbing from tree to tree along the trackway. They were zig zagging from one tree to another for some reason. They were on the ground while doing this. They did this up until the end of the trackway where suddenly all tracks disappeared. I was left scratching my head at the time. I could not figure out where they went. On the drive home I was frustrated, perplexed and generally disgusted with myself for being unable to track them to the trackway's conclusion and hence the creatures.

I later supposed (after the report of the Bigfoot seen in the tree) they were able to give me the slip by climbing up a tree near where the trackway suddenly ended. Had I known this may be possible at the time I would have certainly went over each tree with greater detail to find any biological evidence left behind on the bark.

Why they did this I'm not certain. After all other considerations it is the only remaining answer though.
Chris B.

Or that you are making up stories for ***** and giggles.

One of these explanations doesn't rely on a creature that only those that believe in it can see.Occam wouldn't have a hard time shaving the options down.

 

[John Nowak]

Yes, that must be it. You've solved the mystery, Bigfoot must be imaginary.
Congratulations. Your mental prowess on Bigfoot is staggering.
Chris B.

Sadly, some people are only correct what they think they're being sarcastic.

 

[The Shrike]

After all other considerations it is the only remaining answer though.

No it's not.

You're still claiming that the bigfoot climbed the tree, right? Aren't you also claiming that they somehow interacted (you're rather vague about this) with the other trees along that 1.5 mile route? There must be multiple trees (dozens along the route?) that could have yielded bigfoot hairs - maybe they still do.

I assume you GPSd this bigfoot track so it could be further analyzed, right? I mean, that's what us field biologists do.

 

[ChrisBFRPKY]

Show the evidence of any trackway you claim to have seen...you keep making claims of evidence you can't or won't back up in the evidence thread...why?

Typical footer proponent. State claim -- present no evidence whatsoever to support that claim.

What is the difference between having track pics but being unwilling to share them, and having no track pics at all?

Anyone can make **** up. I was once secretly married to Dana Delaney. I have a marriage certificate but I'm unwilling to share it with anyone. I have a wedding ring with our names engraved on them, but no peek for you. Wedding pictures? I've got tons, but they will forever remain unseen by anyone but me. I ~know~ I was married to Dana Delaney, that's all that matters.

Chris, the more **** you spout, the more I realize I was bang on with this comparison.

RayG

It's perfectly fine if you think I don't have pics of tracks and trackways.
I am unwilling to share them for good reason. Don't feed the hoaxers. Of course you will not like that stance but I can live with it regardless. I won't be goaded into sharing something that only benefits hoaxers. Call me what you will, think what you will, but it won't change anything and I'll not apologize for it. Chris B.

 

[ChrisBFRPKY]

No it's not.

You're still claiming that the bigfoot climbed the tree, right? Aren't you also claiming that they somehow interacted (you're rather vague about this) with the other trees along that 1.5 mile route? There must be multiple trees (dozens along the route?) that could have yielded bigfoot hairs - maybe they still do.

I assume you GPSd this bigfoot track so it could be further analyzed, right? I mean, that's what us field biologists do.

I "think" that's how they lost me. Based on a later observation made by another member of one in a tree.

The tracks did not go in a straight line. They were all over the place and moved from one tree to another. I don't "know" exactly why they were doing this but I "think" they were searching for something. Seems reasonable as I cannot imagine them doing this for cover the entire time. At the time it was mushroom season in KY, so it may have been related to mushrooms and food. I don't "know" for certain.

I noted where the trackway began and ended and have returned there since. I did not "GPS" the entire length of the trackway though. Chris B.

 

[Cervelo]

It's perfectly fine if you think I don't have pics of tracks and trackways.
I am unwilling to share them for good reason. Don't feed the hoaxers. Of course you will not like that stance but I can live with it regardless. I won't be goaded into sharing something that only benefits hoaxers. Call me what you will, think what you will, but it won't change anything and I'll not apologize for it. Chris B.

Spare us the drama...
So you continue to post unsupported, rediculous claims and conjecture in a thread about evidence on a skeptical fourm.
All I'm suggesting is submit evidence of you're claims in the evidence thread or find/start another thread for your unsupportable, rediculous, conjecture and charming stories of your childhood.

 

[carlitos]

It's perfectly fine if you think I don't have pics of tracks and trackways.

I am unwilling to share them for good reason. Don't feed the hoaxers. Of course you will not like that stance but I can live with it regardless. I won't be goaded into sharing something that only benefits hoaxers. Call me what you will, think what you will, but it won't change anything and I'll not apologize for it. Chris B.

I do so have a girlfriend, but she lives in Canada so you can't meet her.

 

[carlitos]

No, you're off just a bit. I did not claim the Bigfoots were climbing from tree to tree along the trackway. They were zig zagging from one tree to another for some reason. They were on the ground while doing this. They did this up until the end of the trackway where suddenly all tracks disappeared. I was left scratching my head at the time. I could not figure out where they went. On the drive home I was frustrated, perplexed and generally disgusted with myself for being unable to track them to the trackway's conclusion and hence the creatures.



I later supposed (after the report of the Bigfoot seen in the tree) they were able to give me the slip by climbing up a tree near where the trackway suddenly ended. Had I known this may be possible at the time I would have certainly went over each tree with greater detail to find any biological evidence left behind on the bark.



Why they did this I'm not certain. After all other considerations it is the only remaining answer though.

Chris B.

Since bigfoots don't exist, but storytellers do, the above post is simple to interpret. More special pleading.

 

[AlaskaBushPilot]

Sadly, some people are only correct what they think they're being sarcastic.

It is a specific gaming tactic, under the shaming strategy: Ridicule.

There are two 'footers doing it right now on two different threads: nightwalker with his cartoons and Chris right here.

It works better in person because you deploy sneering derision with the voice while rolling your eyes. Try it out:

Yes, that must be it. You've solved the mystery, two plus two must be four. Congratulations. Your mental prowess on math is staggering

It isn't at all about bigfoot belief. It is about practicing the game. The game has a set of strategies that requires antisocial conduct with non-players.

There is some fascinating research on this strategy. The Unabomber, Ted Kaczinski, was subjected to it while at Harvard, and is pointed to as an important factor in his belief about the evil of science:

http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2000/06/harvard-and-the-making-of-the-unabomber/378239/

When science was studying the affects of antisocial strategies on people, one of the results was a mad bomber.

Similar studies demonstrated how fear of shaming can make people say that lines of two very different sizes are the same - the Asch Conformity Experiments.

The application of the strategies may appear inept, but it must be understood that University of Bigfoot is following a solid science with a whole array of strategies and specific tactics. It just isn't the science skeptics thought for so long. They are not merely naive game-players. The game utilizes well-known manipulative techniques. My principle objection to them is their antisocial nature.

Bigfoot school produces nasty people.

 

[sadhatter]

It's perfectly fine if you think I don't have pics of tracks and trackways.
I am unwilling to share them for good reason. Don't feed the hoaxers. Of course you will not like that stance but I can live with it regardless. I won't be goaded into sharing something that only benefits hoaxers. Call me what you will, think what you will, but it won't change anything and I'll not apologize for it. Chris B.

So imaginary poop is the strongest of your evidence, with a close second of imaginary pictures, what's next imaginary stories, then imaginary third hand accounts, then imaginary hallucinations which will simply cause reality to implode due to their lack of substance?

You should have just stuck with imaginary poop, like i fly sticks to...ooh God this has pooped me out.

 

[ChrisBFRPKY]

I do so have a girlfriend, but she lives in Canada so you can't meet her.

Since bigfoots don't exist, but storytellers do, the above post is simple to interpret. More special pleading.

Maybe you should try filling your girlfriend with air instead of helium next time. Maybe she won't float all the way to Canada.

You have my attention, do you really need it? Chris B.

 

[ComfySlippers]

You know, I'm not shocked in the least that a Bigfooter has common knowledge of something as simple as tree riding while skeptics deny the concept even exists. LMAO This is rich indeed. Who was it that said "We're not a bunch of city slickers here". Oh God, my side is hurting. Chris B.

I'm glad you can share with the side hurting.
You seem to be so immersed in your faux trekking and bigfootery that you miss an important point:
Everyone here caught on very early that you make stories up.

You're tree swinging nonsense made everyone laugh.
As does your secret HD footage and your secret FigBoot spit sample.

Btw, you keep changing your stories about the above when you're called out on them.
Perhaps you should revisit your original claims made in 2013 on other forums.

Perhaps you should go back to playing the BitCoin game.

 

[ComfySlippers]

Maybe you should try filling your girlfriend with air instead of helium next time. Maybe she won't float all the way to Canada.



You have my attention, do you really need it? Chris B.

You should direct the helium comment at your pretend monkey man.
After all, he can float up to trees.

 

[ChrisBFRPKY]

It is a specific gaming tactic, under the shaming strategy: Ridicule.

There are two 'footers doing it right now on two different threads: nightwalker with his cartoons and Chris right here.

It works better in person because you deploy sneering derision with the voice while rolling your eyes. Try it out:



It isn't at all about bigfoot belief. It is about practicing the game. The game has a set of strategies that requires antisocial conduct with non-players.

There is some fascinating research on this strategy. The Unabomber, Ted Kaczinski, was subjected to it while at Harvard, and is pointed to as an important factor in his belief about the evil of science:

http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2000/06/harvard-and-the-making-of-the-unabomber/378239/

When science was studying the affects of antisocial strategies on people, one of the results was a mad bomber.

Similar studies demonstrated how fear of shaming can make people say that lines of two very different sizes are the same - the Asch Conformity Experiments.

The application of the strategies may appear inept, but it must be understood that University of Bigfoot is following a solid science with a whole array of strategies and specific tactics. It just isn't the science skeptics thought for so long. They are not merely naive game-players. The game utilizes well-known manipulative techniques. My principle objection to them is their antisocial nature.
Bigfoot school produces nasty people.

How would one go about being more social? Move to Alaska?
Try looking up "psychological projection" in some of those texts you study.
Chris B.

 

[ChrisBFRPKY]

I'm glad you can share with the side hurting.
You seem to be so immersed in your faux trekking and bigfootery that you miss an important point:
Everyone here caught on very early that you make stories up.

You're tree swinging nonsense made everyone laugh.
As does your secret HD footage and your secret FigBoot spit sample.

Btw, you keep changing your stories about the above when you're called out on them.
Perhaps you should revisit your original claims made in 2013 on other forums.

Perhaps you should go back to playing the BitCoin game.

I see alot of words, but nothing really says anything.
I didn't know I'd left BTC? News to me. Chris B.

 

[ChrisBFRPKY]

So imaginary poop is the strongest of your evidence, with a close second of imaginary pictures, what's next imaginary stories, then imaginary third hand accounts, then imaginary hallucinations which will simply cause reality to implode due to their lack of substance?

You should have just stuck with imaginary poop, like i fly sticks to...ooh God this has pooped me out.

I guess you could simply make up something and say I had stated it again.
Chris B.

 

[carlitos]

Maybe you should try filling your girlfriend with air instead of helium next time. Maybe she won't float all the way to Canada.

You have my attention, do you really need it? Chris B.

You claim to have "HD video" from "15 feet" of more than one bigfoot, yet you won't share it with anyone. Such evidence would rock the world, and yet you keep it to yourself for ... some reason. My post was perfectly apt. You are telling tall tales. As ever, please produce the evidence and prove me wrong.

 

[abaddon]

Maybe you should try filling your girlfriend with air instead of helium next time. Maybe she won't float all the way to Canada.

You have my attention, do you really need it? Chris B.

It seems you need ours.

 

[ComfySlippers]

I see alot of words, but nothing really says anything.

I didn't know I'd left BTC? News to me. Chris B.

Didn't say you'd left BotCoin.
Just like Mummy and Daddy Figboot is non on existent on your non existent HD video

That could be your signature tune:
"I see a lot of nothing , but it says a lot to me"

The chorus could be:
"I've got a vid but I'm not gonna show it,
Not gonna show it,
Not got gonna show it.

I've got a vid but not gonna show it,
Cos FigBoot swings on trees"