Latest Bigfoot "evidence"

Status
Not open for further replies.
Umm, for whom did you think he was speaking? Of course he is speaking for himself.

Really, is the game playing so big with you that you think everyone else is in on your game?
 
ChrisBFRPKY said:
It's perfectly fine if you think I don't have pics of tracks and trackways.
I am unwilling to share them for good reason. Don't feed the hoaxers. Of course you will not like that stance but I can live with it regardless. I won't be goaded into sharing something that only benefits hoaxers. Call me what you will, think what you will, but it won't change anything and I'll not apologize for it. Chris B.
Click to expand...

I killed all the bigfeet just to make you look bad. I have the bodies in cold storage. I won't show them to you, don't feed the footers. Call me what you will, think you will, but it won't change anything and I'll not apologize for it. LSSBB.
 
ChrisBFRPKY said:
Why would I need to prove you wrong? I recall not caring whether you think they exist or not. So what's the motivation? I can't see it.
Click to expand...

Nothing personal, but none of this is about you--it's about 9-foot-tall imaginary creatures and the evidence for such that is conspicuously lacking. There's no good evidence for bigfoot, and nothing you blather about changes this fact one iota.

Don't even start about not caring. The only good thing about your silly moods and stories is that you haven't regaled us yet with bigfoot songs and poems.
 
It's all ok. Invisible magic monkey men now tree swing.
Tomorrow they will have jet packs.
Dumbest story ever.
 
ChrisBFRPKY said:
Yea, you're right. It was nasty and I was wrong to post it. I'm sorry about that.
Chris B.
Click to expand...

Thank you.

That's the problem with this game. Good people who get into it for fun are going to find a hard time being civil when it is under sustained attack, especially by so many.
 
eerok said:
Nothing personal, but none of this is about you--it's about 9-foot-tall imaginary creatures and the evidence for such that is conspicuously lacking. There's no good evidence for bigfoot, and nothing you blather about changes this fact one iota.

Don't even start about not caring. The only good thing about your silly moods and stories is that you haven't regaled us yet with bigfoot songs and poems.
Click to expand...

I don't care so much I've spend a dozen pages trying to convince you i have it on video.

That logic is....well you get it.
 
ChrisBFRPKY said:
Well, to be more correct, I didn't make those HD video claims here, I answered the questions of whether I had them or not.

I don't seem to remember claiming to have Bigfoot DNA, are you possibly making something up again? I think you are.......
Chris B.
Click to expand...

What difference does it make where you make the claim?
Good grief Chris is that where your head is at....I'm somehow wrong because of where you've made an unsupported claim?
Do you not claim to have spit from a Bigfoot?
These are some fascinating debate tactics your using which at this point leads me to believe you truly don't have anything to support your claims other than your tree/stumpsquatch pictures.
You know Chris I defended you here after meeting you, and even said I'd welcome you at my campsite anytime...consider that offer rescinded.
Your behavior here is truly bizarre and disturbing.
But as someone said this ain't about you Chris as much as you appear to want it to be.....so how about put up some supporting evidence for your rediculous claims or shut up....throw it down big boy you made the challenge...bring it ;)
 
Last edited:
ChrisBFRPKY said:
Harry, at what point did you decide to join the Bigfooter Basher cult here? I remember a time when you were almost a pleasant poster. For some time now I've noticed you have this deep seated resentment of Bigfooters. Did something drive you to this or were you always this way and just acting before?

At one point I thought you may even be an enlightened individual. But now I think you'd probably disagree that the Sun rises in the East. The Sun always rises in the East Harry.

Sure, I've returned insult and I shouldn't have. Sometimes weakness gets the best of me. I've turned the other cheek until both are red though. I'll try to do better.
Chris B.
Click to expand...

So you call the guy out...insult him over your imagined persecution because you refuse or can't support your claims in a thread about Bigfoot evidence?
This is on you Chris your the one whose created this situation and you want to play the victim?
How about you stop making claims until you can support them with evidence?
 
If you willingly choose to wear a Troy Aikman jersey in a Philadelphia sports bar on game day, you should know what sort of greeting you'll get.
 
Cervelo said:
So you call the guy out...insult him over your imagined persecution because you refuse or can't support your claims in a thread about Bigfoot evidence?
This is on you Chris your you're the one whose who's created this situation and you want to play the victim?
How about you stop making claims until you can support them with evidence?
Click to expand...

Seriously, apostrophes.
 
WOO-HOO! 100 pages of bigfoot evidence in this thread!

Chris, from the standpoint of many of us participating in this thread, you have repeatedly made claims that are incongruous with what we know about the natural world. Far more damning, however, you have made claims that are incongruous with your own claims. Your statements read like textbook examples of someone making things up as he goes along, hence our accusations that you are lying, or to use our colloquial term, BLAARGing. I hope you can understand (and I think you do) that in a forum devoted to skepticism and critical thinking, unsubstantiated and contradictory claims will garner much attention.

Let's change tack a bit and address the footprints you claim to have found. If I understand you correctly, you claim to have found 5 separate bigfoot trackways. One of these zig-zagged for at least a mile and a half; one contained impressions 2" deep into soft soil. If we strip away everything else you've claimed in this thread and on your website, your claims of finding bigfootyprints are extraordinary.

Naturally, we skeptics would like to see some evidence from you to support this claim. You will not provide that evidence, however, because you feel that the photos of the footprints you've found would teach hoaxers how to make really authentic-looking bigfoot prints, is that right?

If so, could you please explain why all the other published photos of prints and casts are okay for public consumption but yours present a truth we can't handle? I'm assuming there's some anatomical feature that you are convinced says "real bigfoot" (you can see where my follow-up question will lead) that does not appear on our well-known photos and casts. It suggests to me that you must think that "Patty's" prints from Bluff Creek were hoaxed which would then mean that the main support beam of Jeff Meldrum's bigfooty work is based on said same hoax.
 
I wondered this too, Shrike. Hell...they even sell copies of the castings at their BF gatherings. To me, it's kinda like Pamela Anderson being worried that nude photos of her were leaked on the internet....ain't nothin' new...we done all seen it before.
 
Macgyver1968 said:
I wondered this too, Shrike. Hell...they even sell copies of the castings at their BF gatherings. To me, it's kinda like Pamela Anderson being worried that nude photos of her were leaked on the internet....ain't nothin' new...we done all seen it before.
Click to expand...

It's very common over at BFF(Bigfoot Fantasy w/Friends) Sasfooty, Painthorse, Sunflower all claim to have the good stuff.
It's one thing to make those claims over there, but to come here and do it is a whole other level of disorder IMO.
If your goal is to move the ball forward or attempt to educate people on your theory, one would be completely open and forthcoming.
But that's not what Chris is doing, quite frankly based on my meeting with him and his postings here....the dudes got issues he needs to address.
 
ChrisBFRPKY said:
How would one go about being more social? Move to Alaska?
Try looking up "psychological projection" in some of those texts you study.
Chris B.
Click to expand...

It's good to know I'm not the only one who sees that around here. I still don't understand how the majority here can tear up a bigfoot account but let this pseudo psych drivel pass.......
 
John Nowak said:
I grew up in a semi-rural place and I climbed trees. I never rode a tree down or heard about it in school. That's not good evidence, though.

"Tree riding" on YouTube does return hits, but it appears to mean "riding a snowmobile up the slope of a fallen tree."

Anyone able to link a video of kids doing this?
Click to expand...

I don't have home movies of it but we did it as children. Pines or cedars are best but the pine trees tend to snap on you if you do it too many times.
 
Here's one of the best at the game, at her best, at producing nothing but BS!

Sound familar?
 
Last edited:
ChrisBFRPKY said:
Why would I need to prove you wrong? I recall not caring whether you think they exist or not. So what's the motivation? I can't see it. Chris B.
Click to expand...

So your presence here is just an exercise in rubbing our noses in the fact you have (made up) secret knowledge that you won't share?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom