Near Death and Out of Body Experiences

Biscuit said:
Without objective evidence for the existence of non physical beings the default position is that they do not exist.

Burdon of proof remains on the claimants.
Click to expand...

I refuse to discuss anything with a biscuit.....
 
Originally Posted by John Jones View Post
1. Hallucinating
2. Delusional
3. Mistaken
4. Lying
5. Writing fiction
6. Psychotic
7. Dreaming

Take your pick
Biscuit said:
8. Looking to make a profit
Click to expand...

those are what skeptics and scientists say when they have no explanations...
 
zengirl said:
those are what skeptics and scientists say when they have no explanations...
Click to expand...
A list of 8 plausible explanations means they have at least 8 plausible explanations.

zengirl said:
evidence?
Click to expand...
As has been pointed out, you're the one claiming that there is a supernatural explanation for something that can easily be explained without recourse to the supernatural, so you're the one who needs to produce some evidence.
 
zengirl said:
Originally Posted by John Jones View Post
1. Hallucinating
2. Delusional
3. Mistaken
4. Lying
5. Writing fiction
6. Psychotic
7. Dreaming

Take your pick

those are what skeptics and scientists say when they have no explanations...
Click to expand...

That's because each one of them is more plausible than the superstitions you have offered in the absence of explanations.
 
zengirl said:
sorry for accepting a non-science explanation....I am not a fundamentalist science fan and do not worship at the altar of ''I am a scientist and know what is real and what is not real".......
Click to expand...

That's not the point.

The point is you don't even consider a prosaic explanation.

Oh, and the whole "worship at the altar" thing? That's you, not us. We don't do belief here. People here try not to believe anything, from anyone, unless there is supporting evidence. If top scientists say something, the proper sceptic will look for the supporting evidence rather than automatically accepting what the scientist said.
 
zengirl said:
Originally Posted by John Jones View Post
1. Hallucinating
2. Delusional
3. Mistaken
4. Lying
5. Writing fiction
6. Psychotic
7. Dreaming

Take your pick

those are what skeptics and scientists say when they have no explanations...
Click to expand...

We need to clear something up here.
What do you think the word 'explanation' means?
You appear to have your own, unique definition, but it's not apparent what that definition is.
 
zengirl said:
Originally Posted by John Jones View Post
1. Hallucinating
2. Delusional
3. Mistaken
4. Lying
5. Writing fiction
6. Psychotic
7. Dreaming

Take your pick

those are what skeptics and scientists say when they have no explanations...
Click to expand...

Ummmmm all of those are explanations.....:boggled:
 
MikeG said:
That's not the point.

The point is you don't even consider a prosaic explanation.

Oh, and the whole "worship at the altar" thing? That's you, not us. We don't do belief here. People here try not to believe anything, from anyone, unless there is supporting evidence. If top scientists say something, the proper sceptic will look for the supporting evidence rather than automatically accepting what the scientist said.
Click to expand...

yes....they will delay acceptance of the scientists' statement...you certainly do have beliefs...fundamentalist science beliefs and will reject anything that doesn't fit into those beliefs...as all of you are showing....
 
zengirl said:
yes....they will delay acceptance of the scientists' statement...you certainly do have beliefs...fundamentalist science beliefs and will reject anything that doesn't fit into those beliefs...as all of you are showing....
Click to expand...

Perhaps you should better post with your contact lenses in .....
 
zengirl said:
yes....they will delay acceptance of the scientists' statement...you certainly do have beliefs...fundamentalist science beliefs and will reject anything that doesn't fit into those beliefs...as all of you are showing....
Click to expand...

Edit: NM

I don't even know what a fundamentalist scientist is.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom