ZEITGEIST, The Movie

CJOKUSAP said:
<><><>
Hi there, guy's and gal's, as this is my first post I'll try my best to keep it civil. Looking at the sort of reasoning employed in the underlined section above though, I've a feeling that is going to be slightly difficult. From my recent experience perusing these kind of forum's, I am a bit bemused at the amount of zeal displayed by the majority of the "Anti-CT Theorist" brigade in denouncing every 'twoofer'(what a ridiculous word!) that comes along. If you are all so confident in your beliefs that your government has your best interests at heart, and would never consider carrying out such an atrocious act against it's own people, why are a 'bunch of nut's' getting you all so upset? Reply in 100 word's or less!;)
Click to expand...

100 words....

Because they are snakeoil salesmen, selling a bunch of lies to a mostly naive general public, and I feel someone must be there to keep their lies/speculation/half-truths exposed for what they are.

TAM:)
 
CJOKUSAP said:
<><><>
Hi there, guy's and gal's, as this is my first post I'll try my best to keep it civil
Click to expand...
Hi, CJOKUSAP. Welcome to JREF.

I am a bit bemused at the amount of zeal displayed by the majority of the "Anti-CT Theorist" brigade in denouncing every 'twoofer'(what a ridiculous word!) that comes along.
Click to expand...

Of course you are. :rolleyes:

If you are all so confident in your beliefs that your government has your best interests at heart, and would never consider carrying out such an atrocious act against it's own people, why are a 'bunch of nut's' getting you all so upset? Reply in 100 word's or less!;)
Click to expand...
None of us believe that about the government and if none of us thought the government was capable of committing such an atrocious act upon its people they wouldn't have wound up with so many legitimate piles of evidence and facts. When you go into a theory with a pre-conceived answer you can't ever look at it objectively. That's what was done. There wasn't any agenda, just a path of evidence that led to the right, and only scientifically possible, conclusions.

And upset? Hey, you guys come here.
 
CJOKUSAP said:
<><><>
Hi there, guy's and gal's, as this is my first post I'll try my best to keep it civil. Looking at the sort of reasoning employed in the underlined section above though, I've a feeling that is going to be slightly difficult. From my recent experience perusing these kind of forum's, I am a bit bemused at the amount of zeal displayed by the majority of the "Anti-CT Theorist" brigade in denouncing every 'twoofer'(what a ridiculous word!) that comes along. If you are all so confident in your beliefs that your government has your best interests at heart, and would never consider carrying out such an atrocious act against it's own people, why are a 'bunch of nut's' getting you all so upset? Reply in 100 word's or less!;)
Click to expand...
Welcome to the forum.
What part of the government are you talking about in particular? I don't think the KC City Council is particularly evil myself, even if they aren't too bright. The new mayor seems like a nice enough guy, but he's just started so it's too soon to tell. He might drink baby's blood, but it's not confirmed yet.
Or is it some other part you're worried about?
 
CJOKUSAP said:
<><><>
Hi there, guy's and gal's, as this is my first post I'll try my best to keep it civil. Looking at the sort of reasoning employed in the underlined section above though, I've a feeling that is going to be slightly difficult. From my recent experience perusing these kind of forum's, I am a bit bemused at the amount of zeal displayed by the majority of the "Anti-CT Theorist" brigade in denouncing every 'twoofer'(what a ridiculous word!) that comes along. If you are all so confident in your beliefs that your government has your best interests at heart, and would never consider carrying out such an atrocious act against it's own people, why are a 'bunch of nut's' getting you all so upset? Reply in 100 word's or less!;)
Click to expand...

Because we are paid by the New World Order to be Government Disinfo Shills.:D
Serously, because we feel the crackpot Conspiracy theories are insulting to the people who died and who survived 9/11.
 
Last edited:
CJOKUSAP said:
<><><>
Hi there, guy's and gal's, as this is my first post I'll try my best to keep it civil. Looking at the sort of reasoning employed in the underlined section above though, I've a feeling that is going to be slightly difficult. From my recent experience perusing these kind of forum's, I am a bit bemused at the amount of zeal displayed by the majority of the "Anti-CT Theorist" brigade in denouncing every 'twoofer'(what a ridiculous word!) that comes along. If you are all so confident in your beliefs that your government has your best interests at heart, and would never consider carrying out such an atrocious act against it's own people, why are a 'bunch of nut's' getting you all so upset? Reply in 100 word's or less!;)
Click to expand...

Because I don't like people who lie, I don't like people who make stuff up, I don't like people who accuse innocent people of mass murder with no evidence, because I don't like people who profit from doing this.

I don't like people calling those who carried out this attack, stupid cavemen or cokeheads and I find it partially offensive when people making mocking remarks about the final, terrifying moments of those who phoned their loved one on this day.

I don’t like being called a Bush lover, a fool who believes everything I am told by the USG when I am not American and I don’t like people thinking I believe the USG loves me and has my best interests at heart.

I think that was less than 100 and hope it fore fills your criteria.

Oh welcome to the forum.
 
CJOKUSAP said:
<><><>
Hi there, guy's and gal's, as this is my first post I'll try my best to keep it civil. Looking at the sort of reasoning employed in the underlined section above though, I've a feeling that is going to be slightly difficult. From my recent experience perusing these kind of forum's, I am a bit bemused at the amount of zeal displayed by the majority of the "Anti-CT Theorist" brigade in denouncing every 'twoofer'(what a ridiculous word!) that comes along. If you are all so confident in your beliefs that your government has your best interests at heart, and would never consider carrying out such an atrocious act against it's own people, why are a 'bunch of nut's' getting you all so upset? Reply in 100 word's or less!;)
Click to expand...

Welcome to the most close minded and naive forum on the internet. Wouldn't waste time discussing anything to do with Conspiracy on this forum. Isn't really a Conspiracy Forum at all. JREF is a spawning ground for Neocon rhetoric, Illuminati disinformation, and virgins of truth. If you're looking for actual discussion of the professionals who do support the Truth Movement, I would suggest The Loose Change Forum. As they are the most moderate forum I've discovered relating to 911, you'll find the discussion there doesn't include personal attacks. The focus at the Loose Change forum is to discuss professionals who disagree with the government censored account of 911. I wish you the best if you decide to stay, however this forum tends to practice a double standard. You'll will always provide information to support any theory, while the NIST theory is supreme god and they shouldn't be expected to provide proof of its legitimacy.


"Anger is a Gift" RAM
 
OldSchool said:
Welcome to the most close minded and naive forum on the internet. Wouldn't waste time discussing anything to do with Conspiracy on this forum. Isn't really a Conspiracy Forum at all. JREF is a spawning ground for Neocon rhetoric, Illuminati disinformation, and virgins of truth. If you're looking for actual discussion of the professionals who do support the Truth Movement, I would suggest The Loose Change Forum. As they are the most moderate forum I've discovered relating to 911, you'll find the discussion there doesn't include personal attacks. The focus at the Loose Change forum is to discuss professionals who disagree with the government censored account of 911. I wish you the best if you decide to stay, however this forum tends to practice a double standard. You'll will always provide information to support any theory, while the NIST theory is supreme god and they shouldn't be expected to provide proof of its legitimacy.


"Anger is a Gift" RAM
Click to expand...
So why are you here, again?
 
Thanks to those of you who responded to my post. I get the feeling this is a place that does not suffer fools lightly, so I will try not to stretch your tolerance too far. Whatever your views may be regarding the events of September the 11th, I'd be interested to hear your thoughts concerning the snippet below;
Directive N.S.C. 10/2 June 1948.

" Activities will have to be so carefully planned and carried out that any US. Government responsibility for them is not evident to unauthorized persons , and if uncovered, the US.government can plausibly disclaim any responsibility for them. "

Now, If they were thinking like that in 1948, how much more cunning do you think they are likely to be now? Does it not worry you at all, that such a disclaimer exists, especially when considering unmonitored "Black Op's" budgets and operations?

 
OldSchool said:
Welcome to the most close minded and naive forum on the internet. Wouldn't waste time discussing anything to do with Conspiracy on this forum. Isn't really a Conspiracy Forum at all. JREF is a spawning ground for Neocon rhetoric, Illuminati disinformation, and virgins of truth. If you're looking for actual discussion of the professionals who do support the Truth Movement, I would suggest The Loose Change Forum. As they are the most moderate forum I've discovered relating to 911, you'll find the discussion there doesn't include personal attacks. The focus at the Loose Change forum is to discuss professionals who disagree with the government censored account of 911. I wish you the best if you decide to stay, however this forum tends to practice a double standard. You'll will always provide information to support any theory, while the NIST theory is supreme god and they shouldn't be expected to provide proof of its legitimacy.


"Anger is a Gift" RAM
Click to expand...

Congratulations on overcoming your "to" handicap. :rolleyes:
 
Gravy said:
Hi there. It's "guys and gals," no apostrophes needed.

It's "words."
Click to expand...

Oh, it's going to be like that is it, or are you just a member of the local Punctuation Police? Don't tell me there is a Grammar Gestapo as well, or I'm leaving now! All I can say Gravy, is make sure you use your spell-checker from now on!:rolleyes:Now do you want to address my previous post, or has my illegal apostrophe usage condemned my credibility already?
 
Last edited:
CJOKUSAP said:
Oh, it's going to be like that is it, or are you just a member of the local Punctuation Police? Don't tell me there is a Grammar Gestapo as well, or I'm leaving now! All I can say Gravy, is make sure you use your spell-checker from now on!:rolleyes:Now do you want to address my previous post, or has my illegal apostrophe usage condemned my credibility already?
Click to expand...
You may wish to consider that the last sentence in my post can have more than one meaning. You wanted 100 words or less. I gave you two. I could have done it in one, but perhaps not without violating forum rules.
 
Don't be reticent to say what you think on my behalf. I promise I won't go and tell my Mum if you say a naughty word! Does that response apply to post#310 as well?
 
Last edited:
CJOKUSAP said:
Don't be reticent to say what you think on my behalf.
Click to expand...
I wouldn't, if I thought what you had to say was worth more of a response. Should you ever bring to the table evidence, and not tiresome uninformed speculation, I'll be all ears. Until then, ta-ta!
 
Gravy said:
You may wish to consider that the last sentence in my post can have more than one meaning.
Click to expand...

I can fully understand how ambiguity might be helpful on a forum designed to clarify specific matters, but unfortunately not in this instance. In future would you mind writing your posts with just one meaning per sentence, until I get up to speed with the likes of yourself?
 
Gravy said:
I wouldn't, if I thought what you had to say was worth more of a response. Should you ever bring to the table evidence, and not tiresome uninformed speculation, I'll be all ears. Until then, ta-ta!
Click to expand...

What on Earth are you on about, Gravy? I seem to have forgotten posting any of that, would you like to point it out for me?
 
and?

CJOKUSAP said:
<><><>
Hi there, guy's and gal's, as this is my first post I'll try my best to keep it civil. Looking at the sort of reasoning employed in the underlined section above though, I've a feeling that is going to be slightly difficult. From my recent experience perusing these kind of forum's, I am a bit bemused at the amount of zeal displayed by the majority of the "Anti-CT Theorist" brigade in denouncing every 'twoofer'(what a ridiculous word!) that comes along. If you are all so confident in your beliefs that your government has your best interests at heart, and would never consider carrying out such an atrocious act against it's own people, why are a 'bunch of nut's' getting you all so upset? Reply in 100 word's or less!;)
Click to expand...
I never did like liars. (5 words)
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom