You Want More Proof (2)?

Iacchus said:

Also, did you know that if you take an equilateral triangle -- itself a symbol of universality -- that it can accomodate ten circles (or pennys as I said before) exactly? Thus it would seem to suggest the decimal system is "universally" derived as well.

While here there are four levels or "tiers" of circles, which are comprised of 4 circles, 3 circles, 2 circles and 1 circle respectively. Which can also be labled as 4 circles, 7 circles, 9 circles and 10 circles. So, do you see any possible connections between the number 479 and the "advent" of the decimal system? (the number 11 as well).
Click to expand...
art0802.gif


Wow! And I just realized something. That the number 479 also plots the trajectory angle of the pyramid itself (60 degrees), of which the badge is being strung up to the top of. Now that's uncanny!

While it may also answer your question about how the "10" fits into the following symbol? ...

art0805.gif
 
More Yahweh numerology

1 = A
2 = B
3 = C
4 = D
5 = E
6 = F
7 = G
8 = H
9 = I
10 = J
11 = K
12 = L
13 = M
14 = N
15 = O
16 = P
17 = Q
18 = R
19 = S
20 = T
21 = U
22 = V
23 = W
24 = X
25 = Y
26 = Z


Y (25)
A (1)
H (8)
W (23)
E (5)
H (8)

If I take the letter H (8) and multiply it by 666, I get the number 5328.

Notice the way I color coordinated the letters...

5328 in reverse is 8235. Those are the numbers 8, 23, and 5, or the letters H, W, and E. Wow, who'd a thunk 666 could spell YAHWEH.


Check this out:

666 * W (25) = 15318
Code: 
15318

Its easier to see if I put the number vertically.

[b]1
5[/b]
3
1
8

Y (2[b]5[/b])
A (0[b]1[/b])


1
5
[b]3[/b]
1
[b]8[/b]

H (0[b]8[/b])
W (2[b]3[/b])


1
[b]5[/b]
3
1
[b]8[/b]

E (0[b]5[/b])
H (0[b]8[/b])
You see how the final number in each of my letters correspond perfectly with H * 666. The final decimal place of each numerical representation of the characters in my name corresponds perfectly to characters in the number H * 666 (which is 15318).


Now, what are the odds that my name would have so many connections to the number 666? I think its too much of a coincidence that letters of my name multiplied by 666 still equal letters of my name. Once again, I am the anti-christ.
 
In fact, you can use a simple summation set or recursive function to give you the number of balls of your choice.

Iterations of the set would like this:

1
3
6
10
15
21
28
36
45
55
66
78
91
105
120
136
153
...

And so on.
Click to expand...
That's a lot of balls. Remind you of anyone?
 
Yahweh said:

By the way, I am completely in the dark as to how you found a logical connection between "Triangles can fit 10 pennies" and "the decimal system is universally derived".
Click to expand...
Actually, I think it was the bowling pin configurations. ;)
 
Yahweh said:

You see how the final number in each of my letters correspond perfectly with H * 666. The final decimal place of each numerical representation of the characters in my name corresponds perfectly to characters in the number H * 666 (which is 15318).

Now, what are the odds that my name would have so many connections to the number 666? I think its too much of a coincidence that letters of my name multiplied by 666 still equal letters of my name. Once again, I am the anti-christ.
Click to expand...
Like I said ...


Iacchus said:

If it wasn't for the badge; and if it wasn't for the vision; and if it wasn't for the name Ennis coming up in a book of names -- which, was very specific when stating it was Greek for "the 9th" -- then indeed, there would be no need to bring it up here.

As for choosing the language (it wasn't a matter choice really, it just came up that way), the name Dennis is Greek in origin and comes from Dionysus.
Click to expand...
 
Re: Color me "confused"

Yahweh said:

What?
Click to expand...
Actually the universality of the decimal system makes a lot more sense when looking at it terms of the 479 - Winepress symbol in the next thread, You Want More Proof (3)? ... where it becomes incorporated into the hexagram. I forgot to mention that I had also been working with this in conjunction with the bowling pins.
 
Iacchus said:
art0802.gif


Wow! And I just realized something. That the number 479 also plots the trajectory angle of the pyramid itself (60 degrees), of which the badge is being strung up to the top of. Now that's uncanny!
Click to expand...
The trajectory of the pyramid is 60 degrees, the trajectory of the badge at which the badge is strung from is 30 degrees (respectively from the pyramid). How did you get the number 479?
 
Iacchus said:
Of course you base your whole argument upon the fact that God doesn't exist but, what if it were otherwise? What difference would it make then?
Click to expand...

I don't think I've ever used that in my argument. And even if a god exists, it doesn't validate any of your arguments, I think most Gods I've heard of would smote you on the spot for hereasy.


Also, did you know that if you take an equilateral triangle -- itself a symbol of universality -- that it can accomodate ten circles (or pennys as I said before) exactly? Thus it would seem to suggest the decimal system is "universally" derived as well.
Click to expand...

Actially, no, it doesn't fit them excactly, there is a lot of empty space. Also, there are likely an infinate number of different amounts of circles that a equiladeral triangle would fit exactly 15, and 1 are good starter examples. Also, you assume for this that a triangle and circle are the special shapes that should show this, and not say, squares and triangles. Base 10 is far from universal anyway, many cultures thoughout recorded history have used other bases.


While here there are four levels or "tiers" of circles, which are comprised of 4 circles, 3 circles, 2 circles and 1 circle respectively. Which can also be labled as 4 circles, 7 circles, 9 circles and 10 circles. So, do you see any possible connections between the number 479 and the "advent" of the decimal system? (the number 11 as well).
Click to expand...

I see millions of configurations of geometric (as well as ways of counting them) shapes that could show any number you want. An equalateral triangle with 10 circles is no more special than any other geometric configuration. Also, if you add from top to bottom instead, you would get 136, which doesn't fit anywhere in your numerology, add to that, you forgot to add the last number.


This is better is better illustrated by the 479 - Winpress symbol shown in the next thread, You Want More Proof (3)?
Click to expand...

uh-huh, since just about everything has been picked apart here, lets move on....
 
Iacchus said:
art0802.gif


Wow! And I just realized something. That the number 479 also plots the trajectory angle of the pyramid itself (60 degrees), of which the badge is being strung up to the top of. Now that's uncanny!
Click to expand...

ummm...whatever. First, it doesn't look like a pyrimid to me. What are the horizontal lines for...second, it looks more like the symbol for do not bleach or something, third, the number 479 has nothing to do with the diagram except that its written there. Forth, any coincidences to real world structures are not surprising, as it would have been designed by your right brain.


While it may also answer your question about how the "10" fits into the following symbol? ...

art0805.gif
Click to expand...

not really, and it also still doesn't answer why 4 apears twice.
 
Yahweh said:

The trajectory of the pyramid is 60 degrees, the trajectory of the badge at which the badge is strung from is 30 degrees (respectively from the pyramid). How did you get the number 479?
Click to expand...
Like I said at the beginning of the thread, it was the number of the badge I was given at work. Whereas the picture posted of it (strung up to the top of the pyramid) was the vision I had a month or so later.
 
Iacchus said:
Also, did you know that if you take an equilateral triangle -- itself a symbol of universality -- that it can accomodate ten circles (or pennys as I said before) exactly? Thus it would seem to suggest the decimal system is "universally" derived as well.
Click to expand...

Oh my, you don't realize how arbitrary that is do you, it is also a amathematical thing but as yahweh pointed out it doesn't stop at 10, it continues.

What about the 3-d arrangement? what does that become? 1,3,6...

The size of the circles effects how many fit exactly, you do know that there are gaps between the circles don't you?
 
Dancing David said:

Oh my, you don't realize how arbitrary that is do you, it is also a amathematical thing but as yahweh pointed out it doesn't stop at 10, it continues.
Click to expand...
art0802.gif


No, it begins with 479, as illustrated in the vision ...


What about the 3-d arrangement? what does that become? 1,3,6...
Click to expand...
And why is it so necessary to make the whole thing obscure?


The size of the circles effects how many fit exactly, you do know that there are gaps between the circles don't you?
Click to expand...
If you vary the size of the circles it also varies the size of the triangle. The key here is that all the circles remain equal in size. ;)
 
Hi Iacchus,

It sounds like you are very interesting in numbers. :)

I've studied mathematics and statistics for the last 6 years and have 2 degrees from that. Needless to say, I've found that it is quite easy and most of the time useful to put things in terms of numbers.

With the types of numbers you are working with, you want to be extra cautious and make sure the real-life connections you make to the numbers are not illusory. This not because you are unintelligent, etc., I don't think that. It is because it is possible to attach numbers to just about anything, and there are so many (understatement of the century) relationships between the numbers themselves.

You might find this site interesting for future mathematical needs: http://mathworld.wolfram.com
 
Iacchus said:
art0802.gif


No, it begins with 479, as illustrated in the vision ...


thats because you combine the first two elements of the series. 1,2,3,4....>>1,3,6,10...
And in the end it will only have personal meaning as your vision, my magic number is 713, which i deliberatly created.



And why is it so necessary to make the whole thing obscure?

same:same



If you vary the size of the circles it also varies the size of the triangle. The key here is that all the circles remain equal in size. ;)
Click to expand...

Then I can put the smaller circles in between the circles , no? Circles are circles and will only occupy the triangle as they approach an infinitly small size.
 
Dancing David said:

Then I can put the smaller circles in between the circles , no? Circles are circles and will only occupy the triangle as they approach an infinitly small size.
Click to expand...
What's the point in counting to ten, if each number didn't represent an "integer value" of 1?
 
You want uncanny? I'll give you uncanny!

On a map, draw a line between Stonehenge, Cairo, and Delphi. What do you get? Riiiiight! A triangle!

They don't want you to know that.
 
God help us if woo-woos ever progress to integration by parts! Everytime they get three constants bam bam bam=

Therefore we have (x^3)/4 + c - (x^2)/3 + c - (x)/2 +c

Obviously since I saw 666 in my dream last night...

(x^3)/4 + 6 - (x^2)/3 + 6 - (x)/2 +6

Now we differentiate, which gets rid of the devils number...
Thus proving that differentiating numbers is godly and good and that integration, especially by parts due to it's ability to generate such constants, is evil.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom