Yellow Bamboo: The notarized agreement

arcticpenguin said:

So sorry to be wasting YB's time, but I did read what Randi wrote; here is an excerpt from the [u[Swift[/u] of 2003-10-03:

the part I consider most relevant is in bold font. I read this as Mr. Tri representing only himself, not the JREF in any official capacity.

I do wish Mr. Randi would have addressed the issue more completely.



1. Joko has forwarded his correspondence with mr randi to mr larsen the same day we did.

Mr Larsen - why dont you post jokos correspondence with randi?
He sent it to us as an attachment in yahoo mail so you can be sure it is not tampered with.


In the correspondence randi appoints him as the rep.
He also says a video is helpful but makes NO mention of a continous day light video.


2. We have to thank the people here for asking for all of our correspondence with randi- on friday we will email the correcpondence to larsen.

Guess what? On the letter from randi to us on 23 june 2003
randi says the "preliminary tests at least can take place in indonesia" thereby giving weight it is the real prelim

But most importantly

"The attacker will run towards mr serengen and attack him with a bamboo stick"

Keep watching to see if larsen puts jokos posts
and randis written letters here.


We will put jokos forwarded correspondence here
buy larsen has the emails sent to him as well as yahoo email attachments
 
yellowbamboo said:

He also says a video is helpful but makes NO mention of a continous day light video.


Yeah, it is always better to shoot a very short grainy chaotic clip in terrible viewing conditions.
 
T'ai Chi said:
Yeah, it is always better to shoot a very short grainy chaotic clip in terrible viewing conditions.
This is completely nuts. Do these people claim that their power only works after dark, in poor lighting, and when there are a lot of extraneous people milling around to confuse any record?

If not, why not just make a nice clear recording of a nice, obvious demonstration?

Just do it. If Randi is maintaining that whatever happened wan't an official preliminary test, that's good - it means they're not barred for a year from trying again. So come on, how hard can it be?

Rolfe.
 
yellowbamboo,

Here are the emails from a "joko tri".

Delivered-To: webmaster@skepticreport.com
Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2003 23:08:04 -0700 (PDT)
From: joko tri <tl_joko_s@yahoo.com>
Subject: Fwd: RE: yellow bambo challenge
To: webmaster@skepticreport.com

Hello I am Joko,

Dr Alvin asked me to send this to you about the randi
challenge i hope you get it okay?

Joko


Note: forwarded message attached.

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search
http://shopping.yahoo.comX-Apparently-To: tl_joko_s@yahoo.com via 66.218.93.152; Mon, 11 Aug 2003 07:08:55 -0700
Return-Path: <randi@randi.org>
Received: from 216.120.225.16 (EHLO relay4.hrnoc.net) (216.120.225.16)
by mta104.mail.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; Mon, 11 Aug 2003 07:08:55 -0700
Received: from mailbox.hrnoc.net ([216.120.225.22])
by relay4.hrnoc.net with esmtp (Exim 4.20)
id 19mDLt-00041T-7l
for tl_joko_s@yahoo.com; Mon, 11 Aug 2003 10:08:49 -0400
Received: (qmail 45475 invoked by uid 89); 11 Aug 2003 14:08:54 -0000
Received: from adsl-35-99-165.mia.bellsouth.net (HELO VALUEDB8142DE8) (67.35.99.165)
by mailbox.hrnoc.net with SMTP; 11 Aug 2003 14:08:54 -0000
From: "James Randi" <randi@randi.org>
To: "'joko tri'" <tl_joko_s@yahoo.com>
Subject: RE: yellow bambo challenge
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 10:08:47 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="Windows-1252"
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4510
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <20030811093702.49850.qmail@web41904.mail.yahoo.com>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
X-Scanner: exiscan for exim4 (http://duncanthrax.net/exiscan/) *19mDLt-00041T-7l*a3k7bIjBp0k*
Content-Length: 1445


The test does not involve knocking down their leader, only your NOT being
knocked down "remotely," as they claim they can do.


Yes, I would accept you as a volunteer on behalf of the JREF. However, I'm
no longer dealing with them, since they have thrown so many obstacles in the
way of those who have previously volunteered. I suggest that you ask them
to provide you with a written guarantee of your safety against any harm that
might occur which is NOT a result of their magical powers. And I suggest
that you have a media representative present at all times....


James Randi


-----Original Message-----
From: joko tri [mailto:tl_joko_s@yahoo.com]
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 5:37 AM
To: randi@randi.org
Subject: yellow bambo challenge


Mr Randi,



I live in Indonesia and am a muslim from the island of
Java. A friend of mine
from Australia told me about your challenge with the
yellow bamboo organisation on bali
and I read on your website where you are looking for
volunteers
in Indonesia to be your representative.


I also read what they have been saying on the martial
arts newsgroups. They are obviously
lying and doing everything they can to get publicity
from you without doing the test.
Let me say right now that even though I am Indonesian
I am extremely skeptical
that their Mr Serengen can knock me down, in fact I am
sure of it.


I am so sure that I am wiling to go to bali on my own
expenses anytime anywhere
to prove their claims are phony and fraudulent. I will
do all of the things they want like
join their club etc just to prove they are total
baloney.


I think the next full moon is 12 of august and am
volunteering to go there
tomorrow to do their test. I think this element of
surprise would make them either
chicken out and not do the test at all or accept me as
the attacker.


Can I please be the volunteer for the test as I would
like to be the one to debunk their fraud?


If this 12 of august is too soon to organize
everything I can still go
next month also.


You might know there is a lot of bad energy between us
muslims and those hindus on bali
so it would also help if you could get them to give me
a written assurance of
my safety once i knock their leader onto the ground
thus proving what a bunch of frauds they
are.


Your sincerely,


Joko Tri Lestari



__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
http://search.yahoo.com


---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.504 / Virus Database: 302 - Release Date: 7/24/2003



---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.504 / Virus Database: 302 - Release Date: 7/24/2003


Next one:

Delivered-To: webmaster@skepticreport.com
Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2003 23:08:41 -0700 (PDT)
From: joko tri <tl_joko_s@yahoo.com>
Subject: Fwd: RE: yellow bambo challenge
To: webmaster@skepticreport.com



Note: forwarded message attached.



__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search
http://shopping.yahoo.comX-Apparently-To: tl_joko_s@yahoo.com via 66.218.93.157; Tue, 12 Aug 2003 14:37:32 -0700
Return-Path: <randi@randi.org>
Received: from 216.120.225.16 (EHLO relay4.hrnoc.net) (216.120.225.16)
by mta121.mail.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; Tue, 12 Aug 2003 14:37:31 -0700
Received: from mailbox.hrnoc.net ([216.120.225.22])
by relay4.hrnoc.net with esmtp (Exim 4.20)
id 19mgpU-000A6u-9W
for tl_joko_s@yahoo.com; Tue, 12 Aug 2003 17:37:20 -0400
Received: (qmail 31938 invoked by uid 89); 12 Aug 2003 21:37:32 -0000
Received: from adsl-35-99-165.mia.bellsouth.net (HELO VALUEDB8142DE8) (67.35.99.165)
by mailbox.hrnoc.net with SMTP; 12 Aug 2003 21:37:32 -0000
From: "James Randi" <randi@randi.org>
To: "'joko tri'" <tl_joko_s@yahoo.com>
Subject: RE: yellow bambo challenge
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 17:37:22 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4510
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
In-Reply-To: <20030812022218.69394.qmail@web41903.mail.yahoo.com>
X-Scanner: exiscan for exim4 (http://duncanthrax.net/exiscan/) *19mgpU-000A6u-9W*s1XDls8wQ7A*
Content-Length: 1783


Yes, video would be necessary, and very valuable.


James Randi


-----Original Message-----
From: joko tri [mailto:tl_joko_s@yahoo.com]
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 10:22 PM
To: James Randi
Subject: RE: yellow bambo challenge


Okay Mr Randi I will try to do all that you ask.



1. I will email them saying you will accept me as the
attacker and also written assurances for my personal
safety.


2. I will TRY to get media representative here as
well.



3. Should I also video the attacking demonstration?



Kind Regards,



Joko





--- James Randi <randi@randi.org> wrote:
> The test does not involve knocking down their
> leader, only your NOT being
> knocked down "remotely," as they claim they can do.
>
> Yes, I would accept you as a volunteer on behalf of
> the JREF. However, I'm
> no longer dealing with them, since they have thrown
> so many obstacles in the
> way of those who have previously volunteered. I
> suggest that you ask them
> to provide you with a written guarantee of your
> safety against any harm that
> might occur which is NOT a result of their magical
> powers. And I suggest
> that you have a media representative present at all
> times....
>
> James Randi
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: joko tri [mailto:tl_joko_s@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 5:37 AM
> To: randi@randi.org
> Subject: yellow bambo challenge
>
> Mr Randi,
>
>
> I live in Indonesia and am a muslim from the island
> of
> Java. A friend of mine
> from Australia told me about your challenge with the
> yellow bamboo organisation on bali
> and I read on your website where you are looking for
> volunteers
> in Indonesia to be your representative.
>
> I also read what they have been saying on the
> martial
> arts newsgroups. They are obviously
> lying and doing everything they can to get publicity
> from you without doing the test.
> Let me say right now that even though I am
> Indonesian
> I am extremely skeptical
> that their Mr Serengen can knock me down, in fact I
> am
> sure of it.
>
> I am so sure that I am wiling to go to bali on my
> own
> expenses anytime anywhere
> to prove their claims are phony and fraudulent. I
> will
> do all of the things they want like
> join their club etc just to prove they are total
> baloney.
>
> I think the next full moon is 12 of august and am
> volunteering to go there
> tomorrow to do their test. I think this element of
> surprise would make them either
> chicken out and not do the test at all or accept me
> as
> the attacker.
>
> Can I please be the volunteer for the test as I
> would
> like to be the one to debunk their fraud?
>
> If this 12 of august is too soon to organize
> everything I can still go
> next month also.
>
> You might know there is a lot of bad energy between
> us
> muslims and those hindus on bali
> so it would also help if you could get them to give
> me
> a written assurance of
> my safety once i knock their leader onto the ground
> thus proving what a bunch of frauds they
> are.
>
> Your sincerely,
>
> Joko Tri Lestari
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
> http://search.yahoo.com
>
> ---
> Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system
> (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.504 / Virus Database: 302 - Release
> Date: 7/24/2003
>
>
> ---
> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system
> (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.504 / Virus Database: 302 - Release
> Date: 7/24/2003
>
>



__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
http://search.yahoo.com


---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.504 / Virus Database: 302 - Release Date: 7/24/2003



---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.504 / Virus Database: 302 - Release Date: 7/24/2003

Next one:

Delivered-To: webmaster@skepticreport.com
Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2003 23:09:24 -0700 (PDT)
From: joko tri <tl_joko_s@yahoo.com>
Subject: Fwd: RE: yellow bambo challenge
To: webmaster@skepticreport.com



Note: forwarded message attached.



__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search
http://shopping.yahoo.comX-Apparently-To: tl_joko_s@yahoo.com via 66.218.93.153; Thu, 14 Aug 2003 04:41:34 -0700
Return-Path: <randi@randi.org>
Received: from 216.120.225.15 (EHLO relay3.hrnoc.net) (216.120.225.15)
by mta110.mail.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; Thu, 14 Aug 2003 04:41:34 -0700
Received: from mailbox.hrnoc.net ([216.120.225.22])
by relay3.hrnoc.net with esmtp (Exim 4.20)
id 19nGTv-0001PH-4i
for tl_joko_s@yahoo.com; Thu, 14 Aug 2003 07:41:27 -0400
Received: (qmail 85055 invoked by uid 89); 14 Aug 2003 11:41:33 -0000
Received: from adsl-35-99-222.mia.bellsouth.net (HELO VALUEDB8142DE8) (67.35.99.222)
by mailbox.hrnoc.net with SMTP; 14 Aug 2003 11:41:33 -0000
From: "James Randi" <randi@randi.org>
To: "'joko tri'" <tl_joko_s@yahoo.com>
Subject: RE: yellow bambo challenge
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2003 07:41:22 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4510
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <20030814032642.77617.qmail@web41904.mail.yahoo.com>
X-Scanner: exiscan for exim4 (http://duncanthrax.net/exiscan/) *19nGTv-0001PH-4i*T6QOV1Y0LjY*
Content-Length: 2373


Nothing else, I think, but please be very careful.


These are devious people, and I suspect that they don't really want to be
tested. With that in mind, I suggest that you should not drink or eat
anything they offer you, in case they put a psychedelic substance in there.
Just a precaution.


They will be very difficult, and very cunning. They will try to "win" you
with smiles and pleasant talk, but don't be deceived. If fact, I still
doubt that any test will really take place. I think they'll find ways to
abort the test.


However, I'm willing to be shown.


PLEASE be sure that you have a witness, preferably a media representative.


James Randi


-----Original Message-----
From: joko tri [mailto:tl_joko_s@yahoo.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 11:27 PM
To: James Randi
Subject: RE: yellow bambo challenge


Mr Randi,



Okay I think I have everything you wanted me to do.



A) I will video it.


B) I have their written agreement as well as guarantee
for my safety.


I am ready to go and do it in September is there
anything else I need to do to go ahead?



Joko





--- James Randi <randi@randi.org> wrote:
> Yes, video would be necessary, and very valuable.
>
> James Randi
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: joko tri [mailto:tl_joko_s@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 10:22 PM
> To: James Randi
> Subject: RE: yellow bambo challenge
>
> Okay Mr Randi I will try to do all that you ask.
>
>
> 1. I will email them saying you will accept me as
> the
> attacker and also written assurances for my personal
> safety.
>
> 2. I will TRY to get media representative here as
> well.
>
>
> 3. Should I also video the attacking demonstration?
>
>
> Kind Regards,
>
>
> Joko
>
>
>
>
> --- James Randi <randi@randi.org> wrote:
> > The test does not involve knocking down their
> > leader, only your NOT being
> > knocked down "remotely," as they claim they can
> do.
> >
> > Yes, I would accept you as a volunteer on behalf
> of
> > the JREF. However, I'm
> > no longer dealing with them, since they have
> thrown
> > so many obstacles in the
> > way of those who have previously volunteered. I
> > suggest that you ask them
> > to provide you with a written guarantee of your
> > safety against any harm that
> > might occur which is NOT a result of their magical
> > powers. And I suggest
> > that you have a media representative present at
> all
> > times....
> >
> > James Randi
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: joko tri [mailto:tl_joko_s@yahoo.com]
> > Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 5:37 AM
> > To: randi@randi.org
> > Subject: yellow bambo challenge
> >
> > Mr Randi,
> >
> >
> > I live in Indonesia and am a muslim from the
> island
> > of
> > Java. A friend of mine
> > from Australia told me about your challenge with
> the
> > yellow bamboo organisation on bali
> > and I read on your website where you are looking
> for
> > volunteers
> > in Indonesia to be your representative.
> >
> > I also read what they have been saying on the
> > martial
> > arts newsgroups. They are obviously
> > lying and doing everything they can to get
> publicity
> > from you without doing the test.
> > Let me say right now that even though I am
> > Indonesian
> > I am extremely skeptical
> > that their Mr Serengen can knock me down, in fact
> I
> > am
> > sure of it.
> >
> > I am so sure that I am wiling to go to bali on my
> > own
> > expenses anytime anywhere
> > to prove their claims are phony and fraudulent. I
> > will
> > do all of the things they want like
> > join their club etc just to prove they are total
> > baloney.
> >
> > I think the next full moon is 12 of august and am
> > volunteering to go there
> > tomorrow to do their test. I think this element of
> > surprise would make them either
> > chicken out and not do the test at all or accept
> me
> > as
> > the attacker.
> >
> > Can I please be the volunteer for the test as I
> > would
> > like to be the one to debunk their fraud?
> >
> > If this 12 of august is too soon to organize
> > everything I can still go
> > next month also.
> >
> > You might know there is a lot of bad energy
> between
> > us
> > muslims and those hindus on bali
> > so it would also help if you could get them to
> give
> > me
> > a written assurance of
> > my safety once i knock their leader onto the
> ground
> > thus proving what a bunch of frauds they
> > are.
> >
> > Your sincerely,
> >
> > Joko Tri Lestari
> >
> >
> > __________________________________
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
> > http://search.yahoo.com
> >
> > ---
> > Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
> > Checked by AVG anti-virus system
> > (http://www.grisoft.com).
> > Version: 6.0.504 / Virus Database: 302 - Release
> > Date: 7/24/2003
> >
> >
> > ---
> > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> > Checked by AVG anti-virus system
> > (http://www.grisoft.com).
> > Version: 6.0.504 / Virus Database: 302 - Release
> > Date: 7/24/2003
> >
> >
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
> http://search.yahoo.com
>
> ---
> Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system
> (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.504 / Virus Database: 302 - Release
> Date: 7/24/2003
>
>
> ---
> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system
> (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.504 / Virus Database: 302 - Release
> Date: 7/24/2003
>
>



__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
http://search.yahoo.com


---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.504 / Virus Database: 302 - Release Date: 7/24/2003



---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.504 / Virus Database: 302 - Release Date: 7/24/2003

And the next...

Delivered-To: webmaster@skepticreport.com
Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2003 23:10:07 -0700 (PDT)
From: joko tri <tl_joko_s@yahoo.com>
Subject: Fwd: RE: yellow bambo challenge
To: webmaster@skepticreport.com



Note: forwarded message attached.



__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search
http://shopping.yahoo.comX-Apparently-To: tl_joko_s@yahoo.com via 66.218.93.153; Sat, 13 Sep 2003 07:01:39 -0700
Return-Path: <randi@randi.org>
Received: from 216.120.225.20 (EHLO relay2.hrnoc.net) (216.120.225.20)
by mta124.mail.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; Sat, 13 Sep 2003 07:01:39 -0700
Received: from mailbox.hrnoc.net ([216.120.225.22])
by relay2.hrnoc.net with esmtp (Exim 4.22)
id 19yAy4-000JEj-R8
for tl_joko_s@yahoo.com; Sat, 13 Sep 2003 10:01:40 -0400
Received: (qmail 5342 invoked by uid 89); 13 Sep 2003 14:01:38 -0000
Received: from adsl-35-100-128.mia.bellsouth.net (HELO VALUEDB8142DE8) (67.35.100.128)
by mailbox.hrnoc.net with SMTP; 13 Sep 2003 14:01:38 -0000
From: "James Randi" <randi@randi.org>
To: "'joko tri'" <tl_joko_s@yahoo.com>
Subject: RE: yellow bambo challenge
Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 10:01:25 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="Windows-1252"
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4510
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <20030913022729.42719.qmail@web41904.mail.yahoo.com>
X-Scan-Signature: 4647a4a7e156b969ab57d1e769bfbdf3
Content-Length: 3191


Joko: Interesting! I'm very much looking forward to hearing from you about
what has taken place! I looked up and saw the full moon, and wondered if the
test would be done, and now you write to tell me that everything is in
place.


Please, be careful, and get a report to me as soon as you can.


It will be very interesting to see what the YB people will put up on their
website after this event! I can guarantee that they will have an entire
mythology developed to explain why Mr. Serengen was struck, and that
explanation will be accepted by their followers!


If there are any newspaper accounts, I hope you will be able to have copies.


James Randi


-----Original Message-----
From: joko tri [mailto:tl_joko_s@yahoo.com]
Sent: Friday, September 12, 2003 10:27 PM
To: James Randi
Subject: RE: yellow bambo challenge


Mr Randi,


I already did their balinese hokey pokey full moon
ceremony. I was surpriseed there was so many people
there.


Anyway you were right they are very cunning. Very
friendly and polite and they seemed to be searching
for excuses to get out of the challenge.


Mr Serengen seems like a very real person but i know
his claims must be untrue.


Well tomorrow is the day of the challenge. I have
everything ready-


camera to video it
my friend from java, mr eco is going to be my witness
there is a journalist who promised to be there


as soon as it is over i will email you and tell you
the results which i am sure will mean i tapped mr
serengen with the bamboo pole.


so i will email you in the next day or so with the
results and then get the video of proof to you as soon
as i can.


Joko Tri






--- James Randi <randi@randi.org> wrote:
> Nothing else, I think, but please be very careful.
>
> These are devious people, and I suspect that they
> don't really want to be
> tested. With that in mind, I suggest that you
> should not drink or eat
> anything they offer you, in case they put a
> psychedelic substance in there.
> Just a precaution.
>
> They will be very difficult, and very cunning. They
> will try to "win" you
> with smiles and pleasant talk, but don't be
> deceived. If fact, I still
> doubt that any test will really take place. I think
> they'll find ways to
> abort the test.
>
> However, I'm willing to be shown.
>
> PLEASE be sure that you have a witness, preferably a
> media representative.
>
> James Randi
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: joko tri [mailto:tl_joko_s@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 11:27 PM
> To: James Randi
> Subject: RE: yellow bambo challenge
>
> Mr Randi,
>
>
> Okay I think I have everything you wanted me to do.
>
>
> A) I will video it.
>
> B) I have their written agreement as well as
> guarantee
> for my safety.
>
> I am ready to go and do it in September is there
> anything else I need to do to go ahead?
>
>
> Joko
>
>
>
>
> --- James Randi <randi@randi.org> wrote:
> > Yes, video would be necessary, and very valuable.
> >
> > James Randi
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: joko tri [mailto:tl_joko_s@yahoo.com]
> > Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 10:22 PM
> > To: James Randi
> > Subject: RE: yellow bambo challenge
> >
> > Okay Mr Randi I will try to do all that you ask.
> >
> >
> > 1. I will email them saying you will accept me as
> > the
> > attacker and also written assurances for my
> personal
> > safety.
> >
> > 2. I will TRY to get media representative here as
> > well.
> >
> >
> > 3. Should I also video the attacking
> demonstration?
> >
> >
> > Kind Regards,
> >
> >
> > Joko
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --- James Randi <randi@randi.org> wrote:
> > > The test does not involve knocking down their
> > > leader, only your NOT being
> > > knocked down "remotely," as they claim they can
> > do.
> > >
> > > Yes, I would accept you as a volunteer on behalf
> > of
> > > the JREF. However, I'm
> > > no longer dealing with them, since they have
> > thrown
> > > so many obstacles in the
> > > way of those who have previously volunteered. I
> > > suggest that you ask them
> > > to provide you with a written guarantee of your
> > > safety against any harm that
> > > might occur which is NOT a result of their
> magical
> > > powers. And I suggest
> > > that you have a media representative present at
> > all
> > > times....
> > >
> > > James Randi
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: joko tri [mailto:tl_joko_s@yahoo.com]
> > > Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 5:37 AM
> > > To: randi@randi.org
> > > Subject: yellow bambo challenge
> > >
> > > Mr Randi,
> > >
> > >
> > > I live in Indonesia and am a muslim from the
> > island
> > > of
> > > Java. A friend of mine
> > > from Australia told me about your challenge with
> > the
> > > yellow bamboo organisation on bali
> > > and I read on your website where you are looking
> > for
> > > volunteers
> > > in Indonesia to be your representative.
> > >
> > > I also read what they have been saying on the
> > > martial
> > > arts newsgroups. They are obviously
> > > lying and doing everything they can to get
> > publicity
> > > from you without doing the test.
> > > Let me say right now that even though I am
> > > Indonesian
> > > I am extremely skeptical
> > > that their Mr Serengen can knock me down, in
> fact
> > I
> > > am
> > > sure of it.
> > >
> > > I am so sure that I am wiling to go to bali on
> my
> > > own
> > > expenses anytime anywhere
> > > to prove their claims are phony and fraudulent.
> I
> > > will
> > > do all of the things they want like
> > > join their club etc just to prove they are total
> > > baloney.
> > >
> > > I think the next full moon is 12 of august and
> am
> > > volunteering to go there
> > > tomorrow to do their test. I think this element
> of
> > > surprise would make them either
> > > chicken out and not do the test at all or accept
> > me
> > > as
> > > the attacker.
> > >
> > > Can I please be the volunteer for the test as I
> > > would
> > > like to be the one to debunk their fraud?
> > >
> > > If this 12 of august is too soon to organize
> > > everything I can still go
> > > next month also.
> > >
> > > You might know there is a lot of bad energy
> > between
> > > us
> > > muslims and those hindus on bali
> > > so it would also help if you could get them to
> > give
> > > me
> > > a written assurance of
> > > my safety once i knock their leader onto the
> > ground
> > > thus proving what a bunch of frauds they
> > > are.
> > >
> > > Your sincerely,
> > >
> > > Joko Tri Lestari
> > >
> > >
> > > __________________________________
> > > Do you Yahoo!?
> > > The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
> > > http://search.yahoo.com
>
=== message truncated ===



__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com


---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.504 / Virus Database: 302 - Release Date: 7/24/2003



---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.504 / Virus Database: 302 - Release Date: 7/24/2003

And the final:

Delivered-To: webmaster@skepticreport.com
Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2003 23:10:42 -0700 (PDT)
From: joko tri <tl_joko_s@yahoo.com>
Subject: Fwd: RE: yellow bambo challenge
To: webmaster@skepticreport.com



Note: forwarded message attached.



__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search
http://shopping.yahoo.comX-Apparently-To: tl_joko_s@yahoo.com via 66.218.93.155; Wed, 17 Sep 2003 14:06:26 -0700
Return-Path: <randi@randi.org>
Received: from 216.120.225.16 (EHLO relay4.hrnoc.net) (216.120.225.16)
by mta101.mail.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; Wed, 17 Sep 2003 14:06:25 -0700
Received: from mailbox.hrnoc.net ([216.120.225.22])
by relay4.hrnoc.net with esmtp (Exim 4.22)
id 19zjV9-0002PZ-FE
for tl_joko_s@yahoo.com; Wed, 17 Sep 2003 17:06:15 -0400
Received: (qmail 81933 invoked by uid 89); 17 Sep 2003 21:06:24 -0000
Received: from adsl-35-99-188.mia.bellsouth.net (HELO VALUEDB8142DE8) (67.35.99.188)
by mailbox.hrnoc.net with SMTP; 17 Sep 2003 21:06:24 -0000
From: "James Randi" <randi@randi.org>
To: "'joko tri'" <tl_joko_s@yahoo.com>
Subject: RE: yellow bambo challenge
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 17:06:17 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4510
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <20030916040337.58540.qmail@web41906.mail.yahoo.com>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
X-Scan-Signature: f7ffc56c892aa78563f604026fe879e1
Content-Length: 2196


Wow! How interesting!


Just getting out my web page for this week, so have to get back to that.


I'll be in touch shortly.


James Randi


-----Original Message-----
From: joko tri [mailto:tl_joko_s@yahoo.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 12:04 AM
To: James Randi
Subject: RE: yellow bambo challenge




Mr Randi,



Well I did the Yellow Bamboo Randi challenge the day
before yesterday. I tried to email you yesterday
but the internet cafe here was shut down.


I will try to go to internet cafe at least 1 time a
week in case you have any questions for me from my
report.


It happened on Sunday 14 September. We
(my friend Ekko and I)
were a litle late to get to the meeting point
(which was a 2 hour drive from
where I was staying) but not intentionally.


Once I got to he meeting point we had to drive
about 30 minute to the beach for the demonstration.
Once we got to the beach we still had to wait for
the journalist.


The Journalist witnessing the event was
Mr Suastawa from the radio republik
indonesia broadcasting network. His phone
number is intl 62 812 365 0365. (You can see
the journalist in the background of the video
he was just a few meters away from the action.)


So by the time the journalist arrived the light
was fading fast so we lined up the autos with high
beams so we could get enough light to video it.


As you know already- I joined the Yellow Bamboo
a few days earlier so I wore my Yellow Bamboo
uniform issued to me on my joining day.


At the demonstration were Mr Serengen,
Mr Ananda, Mr Puspa, Mr Suardana and
Dr Donovan of the Yellow Bamboo Organisation.


There was myself, my witness Ekko and the
journalist Mr Suastawa. There were also
a few local villagers but I did not get
their names.


I had some others behind me (Mr Ananda and
Suardana) who also walked towards Mr Serengen
after I started.


We stood about
10 meters from Mr Serengen and
I came toward him with the intention of tapping
him with the bamboo pole.


I am not really clear about what happened next
and have watched the video over and over.
I went towards Mr Serengen and he kind of screamed
and pushed towards me but did not actually
touch me.


I then felt a small push against me which made
me quite dizzy and knocked me to the ground.
The others behind me also were knocked to the
ground. But they were behind me not in front
of me. At no time was I touched physically
by anybody or any thing.


There seems to be no logical explanation
about what happened but since it happened to me
I am sure I did not fall down on purpose.
I tried 100% to tap him with the pole.


I dont really know what else to say but
I dont think it was any kind of hypnosis
or power of suggestion since I was
totally skeptical Mr Serengen would knock
me down. It all came as a shock and a surprise
to me. Bit I have no idea how it was done
since I do not believe in magic power.


I looked around the area thoroughly before
and after the event and could find no kind
of hidden anything and my friend Ekko and the
journalist were very close and to them it looked
as if I was knocked down but by what they
have no idea or explanation.




Sincerely,


Joko Tri












--- James Randi <randi@randi.org> wrote:
> Joko: Interesting! I'm very much looking forward
> to hearing from you about
> what has taken place! I looked up and saw the full
> moon, and wondered if the
> test would be done, and now you write to tell me
> that everything is in
> place.
>
> Please, be careful, and get a report to me as soon
> as you can.
>
> It will be very interesting to see what the YB
> people will put up on their
> website after this event! I can guarantee that they
> will have an entire
> mythology developed to explain why Mr. Serengen was
> struck, and that
> explanation will be accepted by their followers!
>
> If there are any newspaper accounts, I hope you will
> be able to have copies.
>
> James Randi



__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com


---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.504 / Virus Database: 302 - Release Date: 7/24/2003




---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.504 / Virus Database: 302 - Release Date: 7/24/2003

I will be awaiting full, readable scans/photos of all the pages by friday (tomorrow).
 
Okay I photo and send email to larsen all the written hard copy correspondence i get from randi.

Note in randi 28 june 2003 letter to us

"I agree that the demonstrations ( at least the preliminary TEST) may take place in Indonesia"

AND

" THe person will begin the attack from approximately 20 meters away and RUN towards Mr Serengen, attempting to STRIKE HIM with a bamboo stick"

EMPHASIS MINE.

Well in the written info randi calls it a preliminary test and says the attacker will run towards serengen and attempt to strike him
which is exactly what heppened.

Anyone with a friend here in bali can have them sight the original docs if they want to authenticate.

Ananda
YBS
 
Why don't you just provide a clear demonstration? That way we can all see what is or is not happening.

I wouldn't give one dollar for what I've seen.

Video cameras are cheap these days.
 
yellowbamboo said:


...
Note in randi 28 june 2003 letter to us

...


I think we're more interested in seeing the correspondence between YB and JREF/Randi that took place AFTER the 28th June. At least I am. According to Randi's SWIFT postings, the 28th of June was when serious correspondence BEGAN. With said correspondence being terminated sometime with the next month or so, when too many roadblocks were raised by YB.

I'd like to see all YB - JREF/Randi correspondence, not just cherrypicked items.


Originally posted by yellowbamboo
....
Ananda
YBS

Ananda? Who is that? What happened to Alvin G. Donovan III ?
 
Dear YellowBamboo,

I am now convinced that this is a hoax. You yourself have provided the evidence of this.

Allow me to explain.

Here are thumbnails of the photos you sent me. The full-sized versions can be seen by clicking on them.


PAGE 1


PAGE 2


PAGE 3


PAGE 4


PAGE 5


PAGE 6


PAGE 7


PAGE 8


Now...

PAGE 1

You did not - as you were asked to do - provide a full close-up of the envelope. Why?

PAGE 2

Here, Randi - purportedly - states that "the demonstration (at least the preliminary tests) may take place in Indonesia."

Note, that Randi talks about a demonstration. He generally wants to see (or somebody to see) a demonstration before a preliminary test takes place. This was the case with e.g. Natalia Lulova, and is a quite sensible demand.

If you claim that what Joko Tri did was a preliminary test, do you agree that no demonstration took place before the test?

There is another paragraph on this page:

"I will re-phrase your third sentence into an acceptable form: "Your attacker will sign a liability waiver prior to the demonstration releasing Mr. Serengen and the Yellow Bamboo organisation from any civil or criminal liability in the event of your attackers' injury or death that results from any means other than the claimed power employed by Mr. Serengen, excluding any other recognized force or agency."

This waiver (see PAGE 8) is not signed. Can you explain why the waiver is not signed? Since the waiver is not signed, why should the agreement still be in effect, since Randi - again purportedly - specifically requests that this re-phrasing is accepted by you?

PAGE 5

Here, there is a handwritten note - in black - indicating that it is a copy - presumably a black-and-white photocopy. This would explain why the top of the page looks like it's been through a photocopier. However, on PAGE 7, we find the same "photocopy fingerprint", except that this has the signature of Randi - in color. Could you please explain how a black-and-white photocopy can show a signature in color?

There is another thing that puzzles me on this page: The Florida notary has signed and stamped the document. However, the signature by US Consular Agent, Andrew Toth, is not followed by any stamp of any kind. Now, I have recently been to the American Embassy in Copenhagen to have some documents notarized for use in the US, and I got a nice, big imprint on each document - very impressive, very official-looking. Very expensive, too, I might add! I find no such imprint or mark here. Can you explain why this document is not properly notarized?

As you can see, there are quite a lot of...discrepancies...that convinces me (further) that you are perpetrating a hoax. But, as always, I could be wrong. Therefore, could you please address the questions?

  • Why did you not provide a close-up of the envelope?
  • If you claim that what Joko Tri did was a preliminary test, do you agree that no demonstration took place before the test?
  • Can you explain why the waiver was not signed?
  • Since the waiver is not signed, why should the agreement still be in effect, since Randi - again purportedly - specifically requests that this re-phrasing is accepted by you?
  • Can you explain how a black-and-white photocopy can show a signature in color?
  • Can you explain why this document is not properly notarized?

As for Randi signing this, I am perfectly willing to wait with that, until we have these other things cleared. In my next post, I will merely show your examples, compared to the two I have.
 
A comparison of the signatures:

Yellow Bamboo:








My own:


Randi's signature on my copy of FlimFlam


Randi's signature on my copy of The Faith Healers

(Again, click on the thumbs to see the full images)
 
  • Why did you not provide a close-up of the envelope?



    Okay if you ask nicely we will do so :-)
  • If you claim that what Joko Tri did was a preliminary test, do you agree that no demonstration took place before the test?


    There was no mention in any of our correspondence
    or and of jokos correspondence about a demonstration vs preliminary test. The way I read the english on the page means the demonstration and preliminary test are interchangeable.

  • Can you explain why the waiver was not signed?

    No idea- but randi claims it was signed and the signing of the waiver means the waiver supercedes the previous agreement.
  • Since the waiver is not signed, why should the agreement still be in effect, since Randi - again purportedly - specifically requests that this re-phrasing is accepted by you?


    Because the only two documents he signs state otherwise and randi claims the waiver was signed and it supercedes the previous agreement. If the waiver was not signed ity means the previous agreement was not superceded.
  • Can you explain how a black-and-white photocopy can show a signature in color?


    Now this *is* a pretty good question. What we did was take the agreement off the web and photcopy it. We kept a copy and sent one to randi- as you can see it ways jref copy on top.

    Obviously randi signed the photocopy of the contract and sent that back to us.

  • Can you explain why this document is not properly notarized?


You may be assuming that since it was not done the way they do it in denmark- it is done incorrectly. Why not ask a notary expert if it is done correctly.

We are not notary experts- we took our copy to the US embassy
and that is how they did it.


As for Randi signing this, I am perfectly willing to wait with that, until we have these other things cleared. In my next post, I will merely show your examples, compared to the two I have. [/B][/QUOTE]


By why waste my time with your BS? Why not ask randi himself if he signed these document? It would save us wasting our tinme with a maroon like you :-)

YBS
 
yellowbamboo,

I have a simple question regarding the demonstration:

Why didn't you make a wide angle, open and sun-lit video of it? Don't tell me it was because Mr. Tri was late for the appointement.

If Mr. Serensen's powers are real, you could have perfectly waited a few hours to perform the demonstration on the next morning, to clearly show that alleged powers. Why didn't you do that?
 
This is one of the reasons that I can't call myself a skeptic. I read all this and I just dismiss it as nonsense. All done.
 
yellowbamboo said:
Okay if you ask nicely we will do so :-)

Perhaps you should stop calling me a maroon, then. Please provide a close-up of the envelope.

yellowbamboo said:
There was no mention in any of our correspondence or and of jokos correspondence about a demonstration vs preliminary test. The way I read the english on the page means the demonstration and preliminary test are interchangeable.

They are clearly not.

yellowbamboo said:
No idea- but randi claims it was signed and the signing of the waiver means the waiver supercedes the previous agreement.

Where does Randi claim it was signed? Why is the signature not on your copy of the waiver?

yellowbamboo said:
Because the only two documents he signs state otherwise and randi claims the waiver was signed and it supercedes the previous agreement. If the waiver was not signed ity means the previous agreement was not superceded.

Since the waiver is not signed, it means the previous agreement was not superceded. Thank you.

yellowbamboo said:
Now this *is* a pretty good question. What we did was take the agreement off the web and photcopy it. We kept a copy and sent one to randi- as you can see it ways jref copy on top.

Obviously randi signed the photocopy of the contract and sent that back to us.

Hmmm...let me get this right: You print one copy of the agreement, then walk over to a photocopier to make a copy? Why not just print two copies?

Sorry, this is not a credible explanation.

yellowbamboo said:
You may be assuming that since it was not done the way they do it in denmark- it is done incorrectly. Why not ask a notary expert if it is done correctly.

We are not notary experts- we took our copy to the US embassy and that is how they did it.

You seem to be thinking that US embassies do this differently from country to country. There is nothing on those pages I had made that indicated that it was made in Denmark. I doubt seriously that any US embassy has its own way of doing things. I strongly doubt that a signature would be enough.

yellowbamboo said:
By why waste my time with your BS? Why not ask randi himself if he signed these document? It would save us wasting our tinme with a maroon like you :-)

It is, of course, always your choice if you do not want to deal with us "maroons". I can understand this, since it is obvious that we have raised some questions you have a very hard time answering.
 
CFLarsen said:
They are clearly not.
Yeah, they are.
Go read the million dollar challenge application and you can see that the "tests" are also referred to as "demonstations".

Randi has not once argued this wasn't a preliminary test anyways, you are barking up the wrong tree.
CFLarsen said:
Hmmm...let me get this right: You print one copy of the agreement, then walk over to a photocopier to make a copy? Why not just print two copies?

Sorry, this is not a credible explanation.
There are a multitude of possible reasons, just because they didn't do it the most likely way hardly means they are lying.

IT's sort of like you getting stumped by, "how could there be color signatures on a black and white photocopy". Everybody knows Randi debunked the so-called supernatural force that keeps blue pens from working on photocopies back in 1994. ;)

Originally posted by CFLarsen
You seem to be thinking that US embassies do this differently from country to country. There is nothing on those pages I had made that indicated that it was made in Denmark. I doubt seriously that any US embassy has its own way of doing things. I strongly doubt that a signature would be enough.
YB stuck by their claim that it's legit and you admit you only "doubt" it. Since they are commited to that signature being legit you could maybe contact the Bali embassy (?) and demand answers. If you are right about the signature you are a hero and get all the maroons you want. :)

I don't see the point of YB being fraudenlent in regard to the Bali consular though, why would YB fake their own signature?
 
MemeHacker said:
Yeah, they are.
Go read the million dollar challenge application and you can see that the "tests" are also referred to as "demonstations".

Hmmm....I can see that there might be some confusion about this. Where does Randi mention that Joko Tri is the official representative of JREF, and where does Randi mention that the test is a preliminary test/demonstration?

MemeHacker said:
Randi has not once argued this wasn't a preliminary test anyways, you are barking up the wrong tree.

You are turning the logic on its head: Has he specifically said that it was a preliminary test? By using your logic, I have won the million bucks, because Randi has not once argued that I haven't.

MemeHacker said:
There are a multitude of possible reasons, just because they didn't do it the most likely way hardly means they are lying.

IT's sort of like you getting stumped by, "how could there be color signatures on a black and white photocopy". Everybody knows Randi debunked the so-called supernatural force that keeps blue pens from working on photocopies back in 1994. ;)

Please read my reply: I am asking why YB prints out the document, then go to a photocopier. Doesn't this seem very odd to you?

MemeHacker said:
YB stuck by their claim that it's legit and you admit you only "doubt" it. Since they are commited to that signature being legit you could maybe contact the Bali embassy (?) and demand answers. If you are right about the signature you are a hero and get all the maroons you want. :)

As far as I know, nobody knows what office was used, so I cannot contact them. This has not been revealed by either Joko Tri or YB. Odd, don't you think?

MemeHacker said:
I don't see the point of YB being fraudenlent in regard to the Bali consular though, why would YB fake their own signature?

It's not their signature, it's the consular's signature. :rolleyes:

There are simply too many problems with YB: The information has to be dragged out of them, and the pieces just don't fit. If they were sure they had passed, and they had evidence hereof, why not contact the world press? Or at least, lay everything out, for everyone to see.

On the contrary, we see all sorts of maneuvers to avoid the truth from coming out. It still stinks to high heaven.
 
CFLarsen said:
Hmmm....I can see that there might be some confusion about this. Where does Randi mention that Joko Tri is the official representative of JREF, and where does Randi mention that the test is a preliminary test/demonstration?
Page 2. Joko Tri isn't mentioned by name there, only the role of the person who will conduct the tests appointed by JREF. The waiver specifically mentions Joko Tri and calls it a test, but as you pointed out it isn't signed. I would think whatever Randi said Joko signed September 14th is a critical document that is missing. . .

Also, page 2 and 3 seem to give credit to the Yb's claims about the agreed to protocol but there is no letter back saying they even agreed to Randi's conditions. It would be nice to see the dialog that led up to Randi terminating contact with YB.

CFLarsen said:
You are turning the logic on its head: Has he specifically said that it was a preliminary test? By using your logic, I have won the million bucks, because Randi has not once argued that I haven't.
In the open letter to Randi YB clearly refers to what transpired as a preliminary test and to Mr Tri as the JREF rep. Randi's response to that letter makes no attempt to debate those points, yet he debates other points very smartly. If Joko Tri wasn't the rep and that demo wasn't a test why didn't Randi clear that up than?

With YB consitently saying it was a preliminary test and that Joko Tri was the JREF rep why has randi not once made it clear that those facts are false if indeed they are?

CFLarsen said:
Please read my reply: I am asking why YB prints out the document, then go to a photocopier. Doesn't this seem very odd to you?
They print out one copy. Later on they realize they want another one, the orignal internet connected computer isn't as conveinently located as the photocopier so they make a photocopy. It would be odd if I did it for sure, I have computer with BB and a printer handy. However I don't know what YB has easy access to. Alvin has said he had to go internet cafe to get on the web so it seems plausible that just printing out the web page wasn't that conveinent for them. Most importantly, I don't have a sense that you have a coherent theory for why "odd" behavior here discredits them.

CFLarsen said:
As far as I know, nobody knows what office was used, so I cannot contact them. This has not been revealed by either Joko Tri or YB. Odd, don't you think?
Just did a search on, " Andrew Toth Consular Bali".

U.S. Consular Agency
Jl. Hayam Wuruk 188, Denpasar 80235, Bali, Indonesia
Phone: (62-361) 233-605, Fax: (62-361) 222-426

Andrew F. Toth, Consular Agent
e-mail: amcobali@indosat.net.id

Hours of Operation:
Monday through Friday, 08:00 a.m. - 04:30 p.m.

http://www.usembassyjakarta.org/bali.html

CFLarsen said:
It's not their signature, it's the consular's signature. :rolleyes:
The only purpose of the consulars signature is to verify that it was really Alvin who signed the document. Why would YB forge a consular's signature when it's only purpose was to verify that Alvin really signed the document?
 
QUOTE: "Just one question- if we jump through all the hoops and give you exactly what you want- what exactly do we get in return?

What is the reason to do everything you want here- will it make any difference with randi?" END QUOTE

RESPONSE

Yellow Bamboo, you have raised two very good questions. The answers and "nothing" and "no".

If you are serious, you are wasting your time on this forum. No one here has anything at all to do with investigating or validating your claim or your application. These people make a hobby out of taunting applicants like yourself and arguing with each other. If you are serious, deal only with Randi and stay off this forum.

Of course, if you are a troll, you have come to the right place. You will get plenty of attention here.
 
MemeHacker said:
Page 2. Joko Tri isn't mentioned by name there, only the role of the person who will conduct the tests appointed by JREF. The waiver specifically mentions Joko Tri and calls it a test, but as you pointed out it isn't signed. I would think whatever Randi said Joko signed September 14th is a critical document that is missing. . .

Also, page 2 and 3 seem to give credit to the Yb's claims about the agreed to protocol but there is no letter back saying they even agreed to Randi's conditions. It would be nice to see the dialog that led up to Randi terminating contact with YB.

Yup. Nowhere is Joko Tri connected with this....ordeal. Since YB have shown us all the pages, we can only deduct that he is not.

MemeHacker said:
In the open letter to Randi YB clearly refers to what transpired as a preliminary test and to Mr Tri as the JREF rep. Randi's response to that letter makes no attempt to debate those points, yet he debates other points very smartly. If Joko Tri wasn't the rep and that demo wasn't a test why didn't Randi clear that up than?

Remember that Randi says that Joko Tri can go on his own?

MemeHacker said:
With YB consitently saying it was a preliminary test and that Joko Tri was the JREF rep why has randi not once made it clear that those facts are false if indeed they are?

The onus is on the claimant. It is up to YB to show that Joko Tri was connected to this. They have failed to do so.

MemeHacker said:
They print out one copy. Later on they realize they want another one, the orignal internet connected computer isn't as conveinently located as the photocopier so they make a photocopy. It would be odd if I did it for sure, I have computer with BB and a printer handy. However I don't know what YB has easy access to. Alvin has said he had to go internet cafe to get on the web so it seems plausible that just printing out the web page wasn't that conveinent for them. Most importantly, I don't have a sense that you have a coherent theory for why "odd" behavior here discredits them.

It is odd because of the way the photocopies have been handled. If you don't see it, you don't see it.

MemeHacker said:
Just did a search on, " Andrew Toth Consular Bali".

Excellent. If you can find it, so can anyone else, YB included. I don't see any official sign, save a signature. This is highly suspicious.

The point of having a document notarized is to verify - officially - that I sign a certain document. I pay for that mark/stamp/whatever-you-call-it-when-you-press-an-imprint-into-a-paper. The signature can be forged. The mark/stamp/whatever is much harder.

MemeHacker said:
The only purpose of the consulars signature is to verify that it was really Alvin who signed the document. Why would YB forge a consular's signature when it's only purpose was to verify that Alvin really signed the document?

What if he didn't? Hmmm? The document needs to be notarized. There is only a signature.

Stinks. High. Heaven.
 

Back
Top Bottom