Flo
Illuminator
jmercer said:Argh - I cannot believe that I'm going to actually write something that supports YB in any way whatsoever... but I guess I'm going to have to point something out.
Prior to the invention of firearms, people did charge each other from far apart to engage in hand-to-hand combat. (In fact, if you think about it, non-throwing spears and other weapons were designed as stand-off weapons to keep charging attackers at a safe distance.)
Granted, we're not talking "one-on-one" as in martial artists dueling - but a lot of the basic martial arts taught to soldiers in China pre-firearms (if they were lucky to even GET training) had to do with dealing with charging opponents. Special weapons were even developed for that purpose, such as the "horse cutters", etc.
That's what I had in mind when I mentionned "one on one" fighting. I know that foot soldiers were trained to rush at each others from some distance, mostly because they were NOT trained properly in the manipulation of whatever weapon they were using, and because most of them were not warriors to begin with and therefore needed being psyched up. Nothing like a good run to stop you from thinking about the guy in front of you ready to slice you in two
There are also a number of attacks (noteably kicks) that involve running forward rapidly. (Not from 20 meters away, obviously, but you might have to run to the battle to get close enough to use the attack.)
There is a huge difference between running a few meters in order to be at the right distance before your opponent gets a chance to be at his preferred distance, and running a distance sufficient to let you out of breath while your opponent is calmly waiting.
I feel pretty safe in saying that at least some martial arts training involved crossing distances rapidly to engage the enemy effectively.
Might be, but not "getting angry and rushing at your opponent who's quietly waiting for your attack"
