• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

WTC dust

Status
Not open for further replies.
jiggeryqua said:
90% of responses to Dusty would shame any forum, let alone one that elsewhere purports to value reason and rational argument, while decrying personal attacks. You don't demonstrate how much you value reason and rational argument by dispensing with them in favour of personal attacks.
"
Click to expand...

Read the thread. We tried and tried and tried,all to no avail. The mockery is born out of frustration and the fact that she is so arrogant and a self confessed genius. She needs taking down a peg or two. Legitimate target.
 
WTC Dust said:
Oh, maybe I should point something out. Not only am I the best 9/11 researcher (apart from the previously mentioned Drs. W and H-C), but I'm also BY FAR the best biomedical scientist in this group. I'm also the best protester of the group. I'm used to being the best. It's no big deal, only, scratch that. It is a big deal.

If I knew I was the best 9/11 researcher, and I didn't tell you, then you wouldn't have the best opportunity to get what I'm saying. It's like if you met someone and months later it turns out he has a world record and gold medal in speed skating, you'd sorta wonder why he didn't tell you that before.

Being the best in the world at something is what it is. In graduate school, I was the absolute best at some things, meaning the best in the world. It ain't no big thang to be the best, for some people who are used to being the best and aim at that exact spot every time like me.

If you knew a gold medal winning speed skater for a long time, and he didn't tell you anything about his world record, then you'd wonder what else he was hiding. I'm the best (or among the tippy-top best) 9/11 researcher in the world. You don't have to "believe" me in any way just understand that that is how I'm representing myself to you and everyone else I encounter.

9/11 is what I do. I'm great at it. I know my stuff.
Click to expand...

Dusty, you really should worry about Confirmation Bias. You say you're the "best 9/11 researcher," but you aren't winning lots of converts with your posts, are you?

I consider myself a serious 9/11 researcher, having debated Richard Gage twice, recently published a major article on 9/11 truth in the Skeptical Inquirer, etc.

You are not convincing me, nor are you winning any other converts, because you are simply not making the case for your arguments. You SAY that planes will have wakes that follow them with considerable force, yet you haven't been able to confirm any such thing. You SAY that your dust is from the Towers, yet you haven't provided material analyses of your foam, submitted it to independent testing, or -- in general -- helped support any of your claims very well at all.

People here have pointed you to real physical evidence that directly contradicts your claims (such as ATC tapes that do prove the planes were hijacked, something you insist did not happen; there have also been several eyewitness reports from posters here, or their friends/family). You have not 'dealt' with that evidence in any substantive way whatsoever.

You may think you're 'hot stuff', Dusty, but your efforts are simply more and more servings of UTTER FAIL.

You are no more persuasive that 9/11 was an inside jobbity-job than Death Dart and his street theatre, or Clayton Moore with his non-sequiturs, or ergo with his Stundies.

Sorry, but this is the plain truth - if you were such a perfect exponent of your theories, if you're so 'great' at 9/11, why isn't anyone here agreeing with you?

It's because you are not the "best 9/11 researcher" that you think you are.
 
dafydd said:
How do we know that she is who she claims to be? Walter Mitty Syndrome can lead to detailed fantasies. All I see is a tiny picture of a woman with purple hair and a series of posts written by a no-planer who would not know what science was even if it jumped up and bit her on the backside and who keeps repeating the same insane mantras. Phd. No chance.
Click to expand...

To be fair (and I do strive), I pointed out that I was ignoring you now in a post that was primarily directed to Noah. So you might have missed it...which is why I chose to look at this post. I'm not going to respond to it, per se, other than to courteously clarify that I've decided my life is improved by removing you from it. Can I suggest you do the same to Dusty, and take up a useful hobby?
 
sheeplesnshills said:
go back to the start....we tried reason and rational argument.....it slid off like water of a ducks back. :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

I was here at the start. Certain posters didn't even start with reason and rational argument, but get a clue: when it doesn't work, stop. Just stop. Because rubbing detergent into ducks so they sink just makes you look like a ****.
 
jiggeryqua said:
I was here at the start. Certain posters didn't even start with reason and rational argument, but get a clue: when it doesn't work, stop. Just stop. Because rubbing detergent into ducks so they sink just makes you look like a ****.
Click to expand...

I don't mind looking like a ****. Dusty is like a scab that I can't stop picking.
 
jiggeryqua said:
To be fair (and I do strive), I pointed out that I was ignoring you now in a post that was primarily directed to Noah. So you might have missed it...which is why I chose to look at this post. I'm not going to respond to it, per se, other than to courteously clarify that I've decided my life is improved by removing you from it. Can I suggest you do the same to Dusty, and take up a useful hobby?
Click to expand...

This is a public forum,you might not have noticed that. I have quite a few hobbies,making music with two bands,in the main. I just want to know how do we know that Dusty is who she claims to be. You must agree that her posts show no signs of a person who has studied a science.
 
Do you know what, I looked. 'View Post' - it's an option available, if you've ignored someone. I wagered, beforehand, that at least one of Dafydd's posts would be aimed at the person who just said they'd ignored him. Glossing over the content, both of them were. And we're claiming Dusty has a mental illness...
 
jiggeryqua said:
Do you know what, I looked. 'View Post' - it's an option available, if you've ignored someone. I wagered, beforehand, that at least one of Dafydd's posts would be aimed at the person who just said they'd ignored him. Glossing over the content, both of them were. And we're claiming Dusty has a mental illness...
Click to expand...

She's either trolling or has a mental illness. You don't have to be Sherlock Holmes to work that out. I don't see the point of your post. What's the weather like up there on your high horse?
 
Last edited:
jiggeryqua said:
do you know what, i looked. 'view post' - it's an option available, if you've ignored someone. I wagered, beforehand, that at least one of dafydd's posts would be aimed at the person who just said they'd ignored him. Glossing over the content, both of them were. And we're claiming confirming dusty has a mental illness...
Click to expand...

ftfy
 
WTC Dust said:
Oh, maybe I should point something out. Not only am I the best 9/11 researcher (apart from the previously mentioned Drs. W and H-C), but I'm also BY FAR the best biomedical scientist in this group. I'm also the best protester of the group. I'm used to being the best. It's no big deal, only, scratch that. It is a big deal.
Click to expand...

Slightly egotistical aren’t you?
 
dafydd said:
This is a public forum,you might not have noticed that. I have quite a few hobbies,making music with two bands,in the main. I just want to know how do we know that Dusty is who she claims to be. You must agree that her posts show no signs of a person who has studied a science.
Click to expand...

Ah, a musician, that explains it all. :D
 
Dusty, I don’t want to drag this wake thing back into the fray, but as I touched down today, a thought entered my mind. I’m sure you have seen aircraft touchdown during landing, or at least a video of it; so, if what you say is true (the aircraft drags a wake behind it), then why doesn’t the aircraft drag the smoke from the tires contacting the runway behind it?
 
fess said:
Dusty, I don’t want to drag this wake thing back into the fray, but as I touched down today, a thought entered my mind. I’m sure you have seen aircraft touchdown during landing, or at least a video of it; so, if what you say is true (the aircraft drags a wake behind it), then why doesn’t the aircraft drag the smoke from the tires contacting the runway behind it?
Click to expand...

Magic dust?
 
WTC Dust said:
Oh, maybe I should point something out. Not only am I the best 9/11 researcher (apart from the previously mentioned Drs. W and H-C), but I'm also BY FAR the best biomedical scientist in this group. I'm also the best protester of the group. I'm used to being the best. It's no big deal, only, scratch that. It is a big deal.

If I knew I was the best 9/11 researcher, and I didn't tell you, then you wouldn't have the best opportunity to get what I'm saying. It's like if you met someone and months later it turns out he has a world record and gold medal in speed skating, you'd sorta wonder why he didn't tell you that before.

Being the best in the world at something is what it is. In graduate school, I was the absolute best at some things, meaning the best in the world. It ain't no big thang to be the best, for some people who are used to being the best and aim at that exact spot every time like me.

If you knew a gold medal winning speed skater for a long time, and he didn't tell you anything about his world record, then you'd wonder what else he was hiding. I'm the best (or among the tippy-top best) 9/11 researcher in the world. You don't have to "believe" me in any way just understand that that is how I'm representing myself to you and everyone else I encounter.

9/11 is what I do. I'm great at it. I know my stuff.
Click to expand...
This is by far the best comment of the thread.

You are the best at something after all.
 
WTC Dust said:
Just tell me what the evidence is. Then, I'll know that you and I are talking about the same thing.
Click to expand...

Dusty? HI! I've told you what it is, and linked to it.

You still have not clicked the links?

WOW!

It is FAA audio of the hijacking of flight 93 from air traffic control from Cleveland center.

Dusty, have you listened to the FAA tape from Air Traffic Control of the hijacking of flight 93?

Gonna add that to my sig soon, dusty. Clicky click!

/
 
WTC Dust said:
Oh, maybe I should point something out. Not only am I the best 9/11 researcher (apart from the previously mentioned Drs. W and H-C),

9/11 is what I do. I'm great at it. I know my stuff.
Click to expand...

yet you refuse to click the links to the FAA tapes of the hijacking of Flight 93?

lulz.
 
I think it's rather an amazing serendipity that the smoking gun that will finally crack the mystery of 9/11 just happened to turn up in the residence of the top 9/11 investigator in the world. I mean, what are the chances???
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom