• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

WTC dust

Status
Not open for further replies.
There must be high-quality bunk to have high-quality debunking. All that I see here is standard, run-of-the-mill bunk--not worth bringing out the big debunking guns.
 
This is a good sign. There were two likely outcomes of Dr. Wutzerface's performance here: She'd cling ever more tightly to her wackadoodle ideas by continuing to pursue creative defenses of them, or she'd skulk off either without a word or with a weak waving of the hands, which may signal a tacit acknowledgment of her ideas' wackadoodliness.

The latter outcome is far more likely to lead to her eventual coming to grips with the reality of what happened on 9/11. I wish you the best, Dr. Wontuseyourrealnametohelpkeepitfromforeverbeingassociatedwiththisembarassingepisode.
 
dafydd said:
My favourite bit was the one about the plane crashing into the Empire State Building and then the passengers calmly disembarked and caught the lift.Priceless.
Click to expand...

I didn't see that one.
Bother!
I seem to recollect that the aircraft that hit the Empire State Building was a bomber.
Not a lot of passengers there!
 
WTC Dust said:
If you contact any professors, then get it right.

I'm saying that at least some parts of the plane would have bounced off the south face of WTC 2 if a plane crash took place at the south face of WTC 2.

I'm not saying THE ENTIRE PLANE would bounce off the south face of WTC 2, just parts of it.

Some of the plane would probably get stuck inside the building, as happened when an airplane flew into the Empire State Building. The passengers on that plane survived. They just crawled over the wreckage and took the elevators down to the ground. You'd end up with damage similar to that seen in the photograph below.
Click to expand...

There you go.
 
ozeco41 said:
I understood that the B25 had been converted as military VIP transport. Don't have any details.
Click to expand...

There were no passengers.Three crewmen and eleven office workers died.Contrary to Dusty's beliefs the plane did not bounce off the building.
 
The Platypus said:
Now that your stumped, you're just pulling the same standard fallback as every other 911 kook. A poor me, arrogant routine, acting like your just innocent and you were only attacked and insulted while noone could debunk your nonsense.

I've seen this exact same game so many times it turns my stomach to watch.
Click to expand...

It's funny how the education level of truthers has no bearing on the rationality of their arguments. The only difference is that they are a little more articulate in spewing their nonsense.
 
dafydd said:
There were no passengers.Three crewmen and eleven office workers died.Contrary to Dusty's beliefs the plane did not bounce off the building.
Click to expand...

And when this was shown to her she just blew it off.

I'm no research scientist, but isn't ignoring contradictory evidence kinda anti-science?
 
Dragonrock said:
And when this was shown to her she just blew it off.

I'm no research scientist, but isn't ignoring contradictory evidence kinda anti-science?
Click to expand...

Just about every one of her posts was anti-science, except for the ones where she paid meaningless lip-service to rationality and the scientific method.
 
WTC Dust said:
Oops. Got that part wrong. Anyway, the plane parts did bounce off the building, which is my main point.
Click to expand...

I know this was from several pages ago but one does wonder if WTCD knows that the entire aircraft that hit the Empire State Bldg, including occupants, weighed less than the fuel on board the aircraft that hit the WTC towers on 9/11 and was travelling at (IIRC)125 MPH versus the 500 MPH of the 9/11 aircraft.
How she could have even assumed that the occupants survided a 125 MPH crash into the building is especially telling!

Once again I also point out that it is possible that small parts of the airliners did peel off and fall to the ground. Parts such as the VHF antenna perhaps. However they would be indistiguishable from the parts of the building that were coming off and certainly no one with any brain would be walking underneath that face of the structure to investigate what was lying on the ground.
 
Last edited:
dafydd said:
No passengers survived.It was a B25 bomber,not a commercial flight.Wrong again.

http://www.elevator-world.com/magazine/archive01/9603-002.htm

''Luckily, the accident occurred on a weekend, with only about 1,500 people in the building -- compared with the 10,000-15,000 on an average weekday. Still, 14 died in the accident -- 11 in the building, plus Colonel Smith and the other two occupants of the plane. Hardest hit was the Catholic War Relief Office on the 79th floor, directly in the path of the bomber. Eight relief office workers were killed. ''
Click to expand...

My bolding. Clearly, God hates Catholics.
 
I was just beginning to think she was a parody of the red head in American Pie

"This one time, in FEMA camp"

I don't think you can ever live down claiming people walked away from a plane that crashed through a cement wall at 200 mph. Took the elevator down no less.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom