• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

WTC dust

Status
Not open for further replies.
jaydeehess said:
I hope you understand that the bolded part will require some knowledge of engineering principles and calculations involved.

If you read it and your eyes glass over due to complete non-comprehension of the material presented will that
a) mean that you do not have the requisite training to understand it
OR
b ) mean that the authors are trying to bambozzle you and others by using mathimatical gobblty-gook and thus is evidence of disinformation.
????
Click to expand...
"C"
 
bill smith said:
Well I know that they test Boeing airframes on the 'big shaker' at 2,000 cycles a second. But at 5,000 cycles per second the frame would literelly explode apart. Now imagine steel at (say) one million cycles a second.
Click to expand...

I have bolded the important part.

You see, I tried imagining, then I looked at all of the photo's of the steel posted earlier and tried to imagine how not only is this device selective in the buildings it destroys, but also which steel from within the target building. Then I read your post again, then I laughed.
 
3bodyproblem said:
Although I think the VLC player will do it, just gotta coax the audio stream out.
Click to expand...
.
Like when we have to get Salami out from under the bed to go the Vet?

Okay, where's he gone now? He was just here in my lap. I swear, that cat can read. Does NWO kitty need an apprentice?
.
 
mike3 said:
I find this odd. I'm not any more afraid of terrorism now than I was before 9/11 happened. Hmm.
Click to expand...
.
That's because you haven't checked under the bed.


But be careful -- Salami has been declawed, but even a soft paw in the eye *hurts*
.
 
Last edited:
aggle-rithm said:
The real funny-in-a-sad-sort-of-way thing is that I spent so much time on this. I really didn't have the time to spare, but I had no choice...someone was WRONG on the INTERNET!!!

;)
Click to expand...
.
Both A and D have been known to print out that cartoon full page and tape it to every ******* monitor in the house as a hint for me when I got home from work.

On the upside, what they have in mind to do instead of computer time is usually far more interesting....
.
 
aggle-rithm said:
Oh, come one, that's sexist. Would we say that if it were Dr. Fetzer?

...

I'll give you a moment to finish vomiting before you reply.
Click to expand...

I am attempting to insult her by aiming sexual comments at her. You see, by ignoring all that she has to say and simply address her as a sexual object I am removing her value as a person.

Either that or I'm a pervert with no standards.
 
This thread is quite sad overall. IMHO, you have to have something seriously, physically wrong with your brain in order to simultaneously hold a PhD and believe in some of the things Dusty has put forward. I am tempted to think that, unlike the majority of woo peddlers, she cannot help her beliefs and legitimately thinks she is doing the world some kind of service. If that is the case, we can only hope her friends and family recognize that there is a problem and try to get her the help she needs.
 
I notice the most important question about her conference has yet to be asked.

How was the entertainment portion? Was the song she had written destined for Grammy status?

:D
 
Captain_Swoop said:
It's funny how some people think that if someone doesn't respond within seconds or doesn't post every couple of hours they have some how 'run awy' or will never return.

People do have lives outside of the Internet. Even Truthers.
Click to expand...

I'm thinking I was right. Although it wouldn't surprise me if she were to appear in a few weeks for a last huzzah before leaving for good.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom