• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

WTC dust

Status
Not open for further replies.
What you fail to realize, Fonebone, is that there is still no way that a missile with a shaped charge warhead could have delivered asequate fuel to create the fireball.

Secondly, the ecjta seen coming out the sides of the south tower began as unburned fuel, then deflagrated violently on exposure to air and an ignition source.

If there was any sort of HE involved in those blasts, it went off bass-ackwards from any that can operate in this time/speace continuum.
 
WTC Dust said:
The building didn't turn to dust, and you saw from the smoke that it had caught on fire. And you didn't comment on the fact that they found the pieces of the plane right at the foot of the building.

You probably believe an aluminum airplane can pierce through a set of steel columns without destroying itself, right? I'm a Silly wabbit.
Click to expand...

FTFY. Only a moron would assume the plane didn't destroy itself when it passed into a building, and only beaten in the head with a stupid stick would claim some else believes that. You're certainly not a research scientist, you demonstrated that by failing to research information on the topic.
 
WTC Dust said:
You probably believe an aluminum airplane can pierce through a set of steel columns without destroying itself, right? Silly wabbit.
Click to expand...
Are you claiming the plane wasn't destroyed, or that someone here thinks the plane wasn't destroyed?
 
WTC Dust said:
You should believe me because I'm a research scientist,
Click to expand...
Appeal to authority.

We should believe you because of your work on the subject. Unfortunately, you haven't done any work at all and the extent of your "research" seems to be a smell you can't identify and 2 blurry photos of dirt.

Is this how research scientists do research?
 
"That office fire smells funny, it must have been started by an imaginary weapon"

Awesome.
 
Fonebone said:
sheeplesnshills said:
Fonebone <
The shaped charge creates a breach in the ship armor allowing the explosive payload
of the Exocet to penetrate into the vessel before the time delayed fuse detonates the explosive.
Apparently the shaped charge worked as designed blowing an entrance into the vessel but both
the time delayed and proximity fuses failed to initiate the explosive payload.


http://docfoualier.free.fr/exocet.pdf
The missile is divided into four modular parts:
[excerpt]
-Section 2 contains the warhead which is common to all versions. It is a 165-kg shaped charge with
fragmentation and incendiary effects. The explosive employed is Hexolite. It is initiated by a delay
fuse which allow the missile to penetrate the outer hull of the ship before blowing up. A proximity
fused is fitted as a back-up fuse if the missile overfly its target, then causing extensive damage to
the bridge, antennas and potentially aircrafts on deck.[/excerpt]
Click to expand...

Nothing in that excerpt says what you think it says.

It says that upon impact the time delay fuse is started so that it blows up in the ship. It has a proximity fuse (which means it detects things near it) as a backup in case the missile closely misses it can still detect its victim and detonate.

The "shaped charge" is just that... shaped to explode in a particular pattern. deploying fragmentation and incendiaries to rip things apart and start fires. I'm sure the frag is the most lethal part for an air burst detonated by the prox sensor. It has nothing to do with punching the initial hole.

The missile punches through with momentum.

:rolleyes:
Click to expand...
 
WildCat said:
Are you claiming the plane wasn't destroyed, or that someone here thinks the plane wasn't destroyed?
Click to expand...

My guess is the latter, despite the numerous times I and others here have explained that the plane more or less disintegrated upon impact.
 
Sabrina said:
My guess is the latter, despite the numerous times I and others here have explained that the plane more or less disintegrated upon impact.
Click to expand...

She needs a link to Stanly Pramranth's (sp?) experience:

1- sees the plane coming
2- sees/hears it hit the building
3- almost gets killed by the plane debris
4- sees plane debris inside his office area
5- manages (barely) to make it out alive

Guess he's a shill.....
 
Seymour Butz said:
She needs a link to Stanly Pramranth's (sp?) experience:

1- sees the plane coming
2- sees/hears it hit the building
3- almost gets killed by the plane debris
4- sees plane debris inside his office area
5- manages (barely) to make it out alive

Guess he's a shill.....
Click to expand...

Dusty has a huge advantage over other scientists. She never has to worry about a beautiful theory being destroyed by an ugly fact.
 
Alas for Fonebone, the warhead on the missile that hit Sheffield did not explode. There was a quite thorough Board of Inquiry into the sinking as there was with all the ships lost or damaged in the war. Atlantic Conveyor was hit by two Exocets, one exploded the other didn't. She was lost with 12 hands including the ships commander. Both missiles penetrated the hull as with the Sheffield. Nothing explodes until the missile is inside the ship or the control system decides it has missed. They punch through with their momentum.
 
WTC Dust said:
Most people in the world are Airplane Huggers. They think a plane crash is capable of destroying a steel building.


The other people question the Airplane Huggers, but most of them are Thermite Sniffers. They find rust chips in the WTC dust and claim that these rust chips are evidence of exotic thermite.

There is a tiny group of people, a few amateur scientists and only 2 full fledged scientists, who disagree with the Thermite Sniffers.

Almost NO ONE on the planet knows about what I'm talking about. I hope at least some of you tune into the live stream tomorrow at 7PM EST on http://www.ustream.tv/channel/yiptv so you can learn something new you can finally take home to the bank on 9/11.

I'm providing answers to 9/11, which seems strange to JREF debunkers. All you've dealt with before are people asking questions. You'll notice I'm not doing that. I'm telling you what the answer is. I'm solving the 9/11 puzzle.

I don't know where the archive will be at this point, but I'll let you know.



See attached image for the minor destruction seen when an airplane crashed into the Bellaire Towers, here in NYC. Yes, it is a smaller plane, but look at the tiny amount of damage! The Bellaire Towers did not turn into dust, and they discovered most of the plane right at the foot of the building.
Click to expand...

Your stream begins in one hour and ten minutes from now I think. Am I right ?

Will you be in contact with us here during the seminar and will you allow any visitors to your seminar from jref to contact us here while the seminar is in progress or immediately after ?

http://www.ustream.tv/channel/yiptv live stream 1900 EST
 
Last edited:
Some of the steel was taken away?

You say some of the steel was taken away?

I thought ALL of the steel was taken away. One place it went is the fresh kills landfill. At least the steel that wasn't dustified:D
 
Explain away then

An engineer wouldn't typically have the intellectual tools and experience it takes to do this. They have other tools and do other things. They develop technology, they don't explain the universe. .

Well, you claim to know exactly what happened on 9/11 so let's hear it, a-z.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom