• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

WTC dust

Status
Not open for further replies.
WTC Dust said:
My work involves the study of the WTC dust.
Click to expand...
As far as anyone can tell, the entirety of your "work" with this dust consists of taking 2 blurry photos from which you have drawn no evidence, let alone conclusions.
 
wtcdust said:
Originally Posted by WTC Dust
The most shameful thing about 9/11 is that so many people have been convinced of impossible physics.

The plane pieces would have bounced off the exterior steel beams at the south face of WTC 2, not punctured through like Wiley Coyote going through a mountain. Cartoon physics, indeed.
Click to expand...

This might be the dumbest thing I have ever read on this board. A friend of mine threw a 9mm bullet at me and it bounced off my chest. I decided that since it bounced off my chest I would let him shoot it at me.
 
WTC Dust said:
For more laughs, check out my latest radio interview:

http://www.blogtalkradio.com/search/off-the-grid/

tag: World Trade Center
Click to expand...

I guess I'm not very good at searching, but I notice that when I do the search for "World Trade Center", Phil Jayhan (a VicSim guy) comes up twice.

Do you support his "research"? If not, why should we be impressed that you're interviewed on this same site? (Also, why do you call this a radio interview? It's only an audio blog, right? Was it broadcast somewhere?)

In any case, can you give a more direct link to your "latest" radio interview? (Were there other interviews prior to this?)

Much thanks,
an ardent admirer.
 
WTC Dust said:
Yes, another example of electrical energy affecting some materials, but not others.

http://www.i-am-bored.com/bored_link.cfm?link_id=54690
Click to expand...

A laser is not electricity.

Electricity is the flow of electrons. A laser is a flow of photons. They are not the same. Surely someone with two graduate degrees would know something this simple!

That's also ignoring the actual science behind the experiment. The balloon is being affected, it's just absorbing the energy much slower than the paper because it's transparent. Herp derp.

This is basic science.
 
Last edited:
Does anyone know if she actually has a degree or not? I find it very hard to believe,even my six year old grandson knows that fast moving planes do not bounce off buildings.
 
dafydd said:
Does anyone know if she actually has a degree or not? I find it very hard to believe,even my six year old grandson knows that fast moving planes do not bounce off buildings.
Click to expand...


Given that several people already told you the answer without you taking notice, i advice you to go to google and figure it out for yourself. Maybe your grandson is willing to help. Tracy Blevins. The pink one.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom