WTC dust

[Alferd_Packer]

What if the concrete floors had been impregnated with nanothermite ? Nano-particles can even enter the human cell so that is not impossible. Then on ignition it boils the water residue in the concrte in a micro-second at thousands of degrees .. POOF....just dust and vapourised floorpans and steel mesh reinforcing.

Trolling again, eh, Bill

 

[WTC Dust]

Really? You can tell the difference between types of smoke and fumes based just upon their smell? Are you sure you were smelling the "fumes" and not the dust?

What is on fire determines the smell.

Smells are the response of our brains to chemical stimulation of our smell receptors. The chemicals given off from the fire travel from the fire into our nose and interact with our smell receptors.

When things burn, they give off a characteristic smell. Smell is used surprisingly often in research laboratories. I know my good sense of smell has served me well on many occasions. That was no ordinary fire, by smell alone.

Do a google search on "WTC smell" or "WTC stench" if you didn't smell it yourself. Many people try to describe the smell, but say it wasn't easy to do so and that the smell wasn't anything they recognized previously or since.

Smell professors were unable to identify the smell. THAT is almost the definition of a unique smell.

 

[excaza]

you know, bill, the trolling was entertaining until you joined.

 

[Alferd_Packer]

but building collapses can.

They don't make this much dust, and it doesn't last for a year.

And do you have quantitative proof of this?

By quantitative, do you mean "how many days of fuming"?

I think my question was quite straight forward.

Do you have quantitative proof to back up your claim that the amount of dust produced in the collapse of the WTC builings was atypical?

 

[WTC Dust]

Well, I agree with that.

However, more occured than just two airplanes crashing, didn't it?

Not "more". Planes didn't crash into the WTC at all, so there isn't "more" to the real story than planes crashing. Planes crashing plays no role whatsoever in the destruction of the WTC. Planes crashing is the cover up story.

I'm surprised so many people on JREF believed their eyes. They followed the distracting hand and got taken by the magic trick. Silly JREFers.

 

[bill smith]

you know, bill, the trolling was entertaining until you joined.

How do you mean ? It's not funny any more ?

 

[WTC Dust]

I think my question was quite straight forward.

Do you have quantitative proof to back up your claim that the amount of dust produced in the collapse of the WTC builings was atypical?

I have qualitative proof in my hands (metallic foam), and I have quantitative proof of the length of the fuming (more than one year).

Good enough?

 

[IDB87]

How do you mean ? It's not funny any more ?

WTC Dust is just having fun.

You are serious, and not trolling.

Ergo, no longer fun.

 

[Alferd_Packer]

What is on fire determines the smell.

Smells are the response of our brains to chemical stimulation of our smell receptors. The chemicals given off from the fire travel from the fire into our nose and interact with our smell receptors.

When things burn, they give off a characteristic smell. Smell is used surprisingly often in research laboratories. I know my good sense of smell has served me well on many occasions. That was no ordinary fire, by smell alone.

Do a google search on "WTC smell" or "WTC stench" if you didn't smell it yourself. Many people try to describe the smell, but say it wasn't easy to do so and that the smell wasn't anything they recognized previously or since.

Smell professors were unable to identify the smell. THAT is almost the definition of a unique smell.

Do you understand that the "unique smell" at ground zero was composed of organic molecules, not steel dust?

 

[A Laughing Baby]

They don't make this much dust, and it doesn't last for a year.

Evidence to support this comes in the form of all those other collapses of megalithic skyscrapers which were landmarks and record-breaking feats of engineering at the time of their construction.

 

[excaza]

How do you mean ? It's not funny any more ?

no, at some point on the dumb scale, dumb stops being entertaining.

 

[WTC Dust]

How do you propose that every floor of the WTC simultaneously turned to dust? If that were the case, why did the building clearly fall from the top down, instead of falling all at once?

I didn't propose that, ever.

The destruction of each of the Twin Towers took approximately ten seconds.

The energy wave passed through the length of the building during that time. Parts of the building were still intact while other parts had already been almost completely turned into dust.

It was not instantaneous over the length of the building. It passed up and down the building from approximately the level of the ongoing, strange, fire.

 

[Alferd_Packer]

I have qualitative proof in my hands (metallic foam), and I have quantitative proof of the length of the fuming (more than one year).

Good enough?

No. You stated that the amount of dust produced was atypical.

Do you have quantitative proof of that statment?

 

[WTC Dust]

What if the concrete floors had been impregnated with nanothermite ? Nano-particles can even enter the human cell so that is not impossible. Then on ignition it boils the water residue in the concrte in a micro-second at thousands of degrees .. POOF....just dust and vapourised floorpans and steel mesh reinforcing.

Please don't ask me any more about thermite. I find you to be a nice person, but I'm not debating thermite with you. You can just take the thermite theory, crumple it up into a tiny ball, and throw it into the garbage.

You will start to get on my nerves if you keep asking me about thermite. You're stuck on thermite, not me, so don't involve me with that or Steven Jones or Alex Jones.

I love America. I am not a hater.

 

[Alferd_Packer]

I have quantitative proof of the length of the fuming (more than one year).

When you claim that the length of time that the debris pile was smoldering ("fuming " as you say) is atypical, what are you basing that claim on?

In other words, what are you comparing to that you would consider a typical length of time for an underground fire to burn?

 

[excaza]

The destruction of each of the Twin Towers took approximately ten seconds.

Yeah...no, try again.

 

[bill smith]

Please don't ask me any more about thermite. I find you to be a nice person, but I'm not debating thermite with you. You can just take the thermite theory, crumple it up into a tiny ball, and throw it into the garbage.

You will start to get on my nerves if you keep asking me about thermite. You're stuck on thermite, not me, so don't involve me with that or Steven Jones or Alex Jones.

I love America. I am not a hater.

I am stuck between Judy and Jones and I intend to discard one or the other. So as I said before given your refusal to consider the nanothermite |I will test Judy to see what it shakes loose.

 

[bill smith]

no, at some point on the dumb scale, dumb stops being entertaining.

Cry me a river..

 

[excaza]

I am stuck between Judy and Jones and I intend to discard one or the other. So as I said before given your refusal to consider the nanothermite |I will test Judy to see what it shakes loose.

Be careful, Judy believes it was a space beam, Dusty carefully avoids agreeing with that.

 

[Spindrift]

Interesting! Tell me how. If it disproves DEW, Dr. Judy Wood will be so grateful to me for helping her refine her theory.

The coefficient of thermal expansion of metallic foam is inconsistent with the beam absorption rate of your typical DEW.