• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

WTC dust

Status
Not open for further replies.
WTC Dust said:
I don't know where to find this weapon, yet. I'm calling it a flux capacitor because it needs a name. When we find the weapon, it will have some other name, I'm pretty sure, given to it by the manufacturer.
Click to expand...

You don't see it as a device that stores energy from the 'Flux' then ?
 
WTC Dust said:
Correct. You asked the question why there wasn't that much poofing when the spire went down. I say it's because there wasn't "that much" steel to generate the dust at the top of the spire. You'll notice down lower on the spire, where there was more steel, there was more poofing.
Click to expand...

To me it kind of looked inert and without energy anywhere. Do you have a time stamp on a video that I can check ?
 
WTC Dust said:
Smoke behaves very differently from these fumes AND I smelled them, so I know what I'm talking about from a direct observation's standpoint.
Click to expand...

Really? You can tell the difference between types of smoke and fumes based just upon their smell? Are you sure you were smelling the "fumes" and not the dust?
 
Alferd_Packer said:
Sigh . . . .

Molecular vibration is a form of heat energy
Click to expand...

I'm not debating you on the nature of heat energy. I'm telling you that survivors walked away without burns after the dust cloud passed over them, so whatever caused the dust cloud did not do it with excessive heat.
 
WTC Dust said:
Not at all. The mechanism can be carried out by a potentially very large number of different particular weapons.

DEW might be a weapon that can do this. But, it might not. I'm leaving open the possibility (however unlikely in my opinion) that Dr. Judy Wood is wrong.
Click to expand...

In other words, you have no clue as to what you are talking about.
 
WTC Dust said:
I'm not debating you on the nature of heat energy. I'm telling you that survivors walked away without burns after the dust cloud passed over them, so whatever caused the dust cloud did not do it with excessive heat.
Click to expand...

Gravity doesn't produce much heat, that is true.
 
bill smith said:
To me it kind of looked inert and without energy anywhere. Do you have a time stamp on a video that I can check ?
Click to expand...

"Inert" and "steel becoming dust" are incompatible concepts. Inert means non-reactive.

Here's the relevant equation:

steel beam + energy = tiny bits of steel beam
 
How do you propose that every floor of the WTC simultaneously turned to dust? If that were the case, why did the building clearly fall from the top down, instead of falling all at once?
 
WTC Dust said:
I'm not debating you on the nature of heat energy. I'm telling you that survivors walked away without burns after the dust cloud passed over them, so whatever caused the dust cloud did not do it with excessive heat.
Click to expand...

What if the concrete floors had been impregnated with nanothermite ? Nano-particles can even enter the human cell so that is not impossible. Then on ignition it boils the water residue in the concrte in a micro-second at thousands of degrees .. POOF....just dust and vapourised floorpans and steel mesh reinforcing.
 
WTC Dust said:
I'm only explaining the presence of an incredible amount of dust where two giant buildings used to stand. Airplane crashes can't do this.
Click to expand...

Well, I agree with that.

However, more occured than just two airplanes crashing, didn't it?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom