WTC dust

[WTC Dust]

Since momentum is a function of both mass AND velocity, it really doesn't tell you much to know how fast something is moving, anyway.

How much would it hurt if a boat pinned you to a dock at 1 mph? A rowboat, not so much. An ocean liner...squish.

My question to you is "how long would it have taken these concrete floors you speak of to fall twelve feet?"

Since the lower floor isn't going to fall before the upper floor hits it (under a collapse scenario), then how long will it take for the second floor plus the first floor that fell to fall down to the third floor in the sequence?

Etc. going all the way down adds up to more than a minute.

NOT THAT ANY OF THAT HAPPENED, FOLKS! Floors didn't fall onto other floors. Floors got turned into dust, and then the dust fell. Floors crashing into each other did not generate the dust.

And even if they had, they wouldn't have generated metallic foam.

 

[WTC Dust]

Please elaborate on this.

how do you separate the molecules of a solid without adding energy?

I never said energy wasn't added. I said that the energy added was vibrational energy, and NOT heat energy.

 

[WTC Dust]

Sure seems like a lot of trouble, doesn't it?

I wonder why they didn't just hijack airplanes and crash them into buildings.

Because plane crashes don't do that to steel buildings.

 

[WTC Dust]

With a reeealy sharp razor, or a terahertz discombobulator powered by 'free energy'

Call it the FLUX CAPACITOR, please. The perps may not have given it that name, but that's what it does.

 

[WTC Dust]

Let's face it WTC Dust has been sold a bill of goods and bought into the scam hook line and sinker. She knew nothing of physics beforehand and knows only what she has learned in the recent past from the likes of Judy Wood.
WTCD simply does not have the capacity to understand how ignorant of physics she really is.

My professors thought well enough of my physics knowledge to give me good grades.

 

[WTC Dust]

Do you have a theory for what set the girders flying in the top portion ? Some were found hundreds of feet away. Judging by the videos they were driven out by some kind of explosive force.

I think that all of the molecules pushing each other apart amounted to this explosive force. Notice it wasn't an insane amount of horizontal force? Maximum horizontal velocity was determined to be less than 40 feet per second.

I call it a "gentle explosion" or "poof".

 

[WTC Dust]

I'm guessing that even you find infrared light as an improbable means of destruction...

I'm not ruling out any part of the electromagnetic spectrum.

 

[bill smith]

Call it the FLUX CAPACITOR, please. The perps may not have given it that name, but that's what it does.

What is the 'Flux' and where would I find it ?

 

[bill smith]

I think that all of the molecules pushing each other apart amounted to this explosive force. Notice it wasn't an insane amount of horizontal force? Maximum horizontal velocity was determined to be less than 40 feet per second.

I call it a "gentle explosion" or "poof".

When the core remnants dustified there clearly was no power being generated in that sense. That was easy to see.

 

[WTC Dust]

Nope, they have their uses. I did not mean to imply otherwise.

I was commenting on your specific analogy and it's unwitting similarity to what 911 CTers are attempting to do.

Specifically, trying to explain the whys & wherefores of an event that could not possibly have happened.

I'm only explaining the presence of an incredible amount of dust where two giant buildings used to stand. Airplane crashes can't do this.

 

[WTC Dust]

That would be the same thing, would it not?

Not at all. The mechanism can be carried out by a potentially very large number of different particular weapons.

DEW might be a weapon that can do this. But, it might not. I'm leaving open the possibility (however unlikely in my opinion) that Dr. Judy Wood is wrong.

 

[Alferd_Packer]

I'm only explaining the presence of an incredible amount of dust where two giant buildings used to stand. Airplane crashes can't do this.

but building collapses can.

 

[WTC Dust]

How can you tell from a picture that it is a "strange fume" and not ordinary smoke?

Smoke behaves very differently from these fumes AND I smelled them, so I know what I'm talking about from a direct observation's standpoint.

 

[WTC Dust]

Analogy fails because there are plenty of direct witnesses to the 9/11 attacks.

For the analogy to even be remotely relevant, the town witnesses would see you pointing your weapon, and would witness the direct effect of your weapon on the victim.
They would immediately understand the cause and effect, even if they'd never seen a gun. It's not a difficult analogy to make.

Since in the case of 9/11 there is direct evidence of multiple hijackings, plane impacts, large fires, degradation of the buildings affected and eventual collapse, we have a contiguous chain of causal relationships, all easily verified by competent investigation.

Your analogy fails.

I wasn't going to bother responding, but it's irritating to see your handwaving and arrogance.

I included the villagers as direct observers in the analogy. In this scenario, they see everything, but I can't expect them to recognize a tiny object in a person's hand, especially since the moment their attentions were raised, the deed had been done.

The villagers in my analogy maybe did or did not see the actual weapon, but I say that they wouldn't know what it was or even recognize it AS a weapon.

Can you give me any direct evidence of the hijackings on 9/11? I've been asking for them on another thread.

 

[WTC Dust]

but building collapses can.

They don't make this much dust, and it doesn't last for a year.

 

[WTC Dust]

I almost forgot to address your bare assertion 'Explosives did not take down the World Trade Center. An electrical weapon did'

There's no evidence for either hypothesis, explosives or magic electrical weapon. You are invoking magic since you cannot demonstrate that such a weapon even exists, nor can you explain the physics of such a weapon, were it to exist.
You are still very far from forming a testable, scientific theory. But your arrogance allows you to view every brain-fart as an epiphany. You're a terrible scientist.

Tiny, unassailable nuggets of truth are golden. Metallic foam disproves airplane crashes.

 

[Alferd_Packer]

I never said energy wasn't added. I said that the energy added was vibrational energy, and NOT heat energy.

Sigh . . . .

Molecular vibration is a form of heat energy

 

[Spindrift]

They don't make this much dust, and it doesn't last for a year.

Why not?

 

[WTC Dust]

What is the 'Flux' and where would I find it ?

I don't know where to find this weapon, yet. I'm calling it a flux capacitor because it needs a name. When we find the weapon, it will have some other name, I'm pretty sure, given to it by the manufacturer.

 

[WTC Dust]

When the core remnants dustified there clearly was no power being generated in that sense. That was easy to see.

Correct. You asked the question why there wasn't that much poofing when the spire went down. I say it's because there wasn't "that much" steel to generate the dust at the top of the spire. You'll notice down lower on the spire, where there was more steel, there was more poofing.