WTC dust

[nvidiot]

You don't know anything about physics do you?

And what evidence do you have that the dust you've collected was deposited on 9/11?

 

[WTC Dust]

You are a liar, no steel was missing, you are making insane claims based on nothing. Why do you lie about 911?

Retract your statement, retract your idiotic lie or provide proof. You have no evidence, you failed.

I have provided plenty of proof and will continue to do so. Especially on December 1. Hopefully everything works out on that date, or I'll look like an idiot, but I already have been called much worse. I spent all day today writing a song with a couple of music people.

How's this: WTC "Where's the crash?" WTC "Where's the collapse?" I'm going to try and use my .sig in the song, too, as the refrain.

 

[WTC Dust]

Not as mod:

Has anyone posted R. Mackey's explanation of why DEW could not have been used at the WTC lately?

He forces this situation where the energy has to come from directly above, straight down onto the buildings, and then debunks that.

So? He built his own strawman, and demolished it nicely. Not a debunking of DEW.

 

[WTC Dust]

You don't know anything about physics do you?

And what evidence do you have that the dust you've collected was deposited on 9/11?

The location of the find and the constitution of the samples.

 

[A W Smith]

I have provided plenty of proof and will continue to do so. Especially on December 1. Hopefully everything works out on that date, or I'll look like an idiot, but I already have been called much worse. I spent all day today writing a song with a couple of music people.

How's this: WTC "Where's the crash?" WTC "Where's the collapse?" I'm going to try and use my .sig in the song, too, as the refrain.

http://www.bullyonline.org/workbully/attent.htm

Attention seeking methods
Attention-seeking is particularly noticeable with females so I've used the pronoun "she". Males also exhibit attention-seeking behaviour.
Attention seekers commonly exploit the suffering of others to gain attention for themselves.

The emotionally immature person, however, has low levels of self-esteem and self-confidence and consequently feels insecure; to counter these feelings of insecurity they will spend a large proportion of their lives creating situations in which they become the centre of attention. It may be that the need for attention is inversely proportional to emotional maturity, therefore anyone indulging in attention-seeking behaviours is telling you how emotionally immature they are.

 

[WTC Dust]

You can buy sheets of foamed aluminium now.....it looks cool!

Aluminum is a metal. But my samples are magnetic, which essentially means they are composed of iron, cobalt, nickel or gadolinium. Anything else make things magnetic?

I'm not talking paramagnetic. I'm talking macroscopically, make a magnet dance, magnetic.

 

[lionking]

Who knew those English had clocks in 700!

And guns and bullets.

Major analogy fail.

 

[1337m4n]

None of them is likely to be true.

But time-travel IS likely?

Sorry, but I'd sooner believe in the fragmenting-knife theory than in time-travel.

Bad analogy is bad.

 

[WTC Dust]

Where is the science in your claims? By science, I don't mean science fiction!

The essence of science can be simple comparisons.

Compare this event that is called a plane crash on 9/11? Does the damage appear similar or different to other instances of planes crashing into buildings?

Compare my samples to other known WTC dust samples. Are they similar or different to these samples?

 

[1337m4n]

"The WTC was turned largely into dust" is my theory.

Your theory is born of stupidity and ignorance:

Nothing in these pictures but a bunch of dust, right? LOL!

9 years of failure; keep it up!

 

[WTC Dust]

If that's so, why are you here instead of convincing the scientific community by putting it through peer reviewed scrutiny in the proper way?

Why do you expect people to take your word for it?

9/11 research is currently taboo in academia. I'm giving you my data and I'm having a public seminar on December 1. I will broadcast it live on USTREAM. You can sign in and ask questions. I've put this event on the JREF calender.

 

[WTC Dust]

Your theory is born of stupidity and ignorance:

[qimg]http://www.limitstogrowth.org/WEB-Graphics/wtc-rubble.jpg[/qimg]

[qimg]http://www.bollyn.com/public/ParticlesRisingFromWTCrubble.jpg[/qimg]

[qimg]http://www.prisonplanet.com/images/august2006/250806rubble1.jpg[/qimg]

[qimg]http://bitrazor.com/content/wtc/rubble_1.jpg[/qimg]

[qimg]http://dart2.arc.nasa.gov/Deployments/NYC-WTC2001/images/LER049.jpg[/qimg]


Nothing in these pictures but a bunch of dust, right? LOL!

9 years of failure; keep it up!

You don't see the dust and strange fumes in those pictures? I actually really enjoy being proved right by my detractors, so keep it coming. Yes, I saw steel in those pics. It wasn't all turned into dust.

 

[WTC Dust]

But time-travel IS likely?

Sorry, but I'd sooner believe in the fragmenting-knife theory than in time-travel.

Bad analogy is bad.

Gedanken experimentation makes up the largest portion of experimentation. You have to think about things before you perform real life experiments.

Advanced technology appears as magic to the uninformed. So on 9/11, you didn't know about DEW. That doesn't mean DEW didn't do it or that DEW doesn't exist. I found out about DEW since then, the real life kind. Why haven't you?

 

[carlitos]

Your analogy fails because a complete hypothesis is available for 9/11 that accounts for all the events of the day (real events, that is, rather than fantasies such as steel turning to dust, which did not happen).

I see, however, from your illustration that the 8th Century villagers would be further confounded by the need to account for the presence in their midst of a bicycle, a clock, and neo-classical architecture. I think explaining the murder would be the least of their worries.

Dave

And guns!

But time-travel IS likely?

Sorry, but I'd sooner believe in the fragmenting-knife theory than in time-travel.

Bad analogy is bad.

Actually, to be fair, time travel is just as likely as the hologram/beam weapon from space scenario. Throw a couple of banana peels and a miller high life in the flux capacator and have at it.

 

[phunk]

Why didn't we find the toilets and sinks? There must have been at least a few thousand in the WTC complex.

You think a toilet or sink could survive that collapse without being smashed to tiny bits of porcelain?

 

[phiwum]

The dust I found was deposited on 9/11.

In another post, you claimed that the evidence for this was the location of the dust and the constitution of the sample.

The location of the dust is not proof of when it was deposited. How long had the building stood there? Surely, it is possible that dust settled there from other sources over that time.

To claim that the constitution of the sample is evidence that it was deposited on 9/11 is circular. You claim that the buildings were dustified on 9/11, because you have this dust. You claim that this dust had to come from 9/11, because it's the sort of dust that you'd get if a building was dustified.

Again, how do you know that this dust (or a substantial portion of it) was deposited on 9/11?

 

[The Platypus]

9/11 research is currently taboo in academia. I'm giving you my data and I'm having a public seminar on December 1. I will broadcast it live on USTREAM. You can sign in and ask questions. I've put this event on the JREF calender.

That's it? That's your big plan, claim it's "taboo in academia" so instead your going to rant on USTREAM, promoted on the calendar of this forum?

Don't wonder noone takes you seriously but other kooks...

 

[WTC Dust]

You think a toilet or sink could survive that collapse without being smashed to tiny bits of porcelain?

If there had been a collapse, I'd have expected many toilets and sinks to have survived. This building experienced a pancake collapse. The WTC should have looked something like this, if a collapse had occurred.

 

[WTC Dust]

In another post, you claimed that the evidence for this was the location of the dust and the constitution of the sample.

The location of the dust is not proof of when it was deposited. How long had the building stood there? Surely, it is possible that dust settled there from other sources over that time.

To claim that the constitution of the sample is evidence that it was deposited on 9/11 is circular. You claim that the buildings were dustified on 9/11, because you have this dust. You claim that this dust had to come from 9/11, because it's the sort of dust that you'd get if a building was dustified.

Again, how do you know that this dust (or a substantial portion of it) was deposited on 9/11?

Just to begin: The dust on the left is the dust that I found. The dust on the right was found a few hundred feet away from the dust that I found.

 

[dc1971]

If there had been a collapse, I'd have expected many toilets and sinks to have survived. This building experienced a pancake collapse. The WTC should have looked something like this, if a collapse had occurred.

Do sinks and toilets fit the category of "bling"?