• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

WTC dust

Status
Not open for further replies.
bill smith said:
No but I have some great pictures of core columns that I can post. Then we can ask the Readers to imagine 10 MILES of the same.....just plain missing.

. You can go by the numbers if you wish. I will stress the visuals. Have fun.
Click to expand...
I recently finished a job with 37 miles of wire it it. Is it a really big building?
 
WTC Dust said:
Yeah. The building collapsed at nearly free-fall speed, which means that almost 100% of the potential energy was converted into kinetic energy.

Where did all this energy come from to destroy the buildings?
Click to expand...

Ignoring your 'almost free fall' blather because it's not part of the topic...

I can't believe you can seriously put 'potential energy' and 'where did all this energy come from?' in the same sentence and not realize how stupid the sentence is.
 
by that metric...

phiwum said:
You know what I think? I think the more times a person repeats the claim that she is funny and entertaining, the funnier and more entertaining that person is. I don't know of any better way to be sure that a person is funny than that they repeatedly tell you so.

By this metric, you're a remarkably funny and entertaining person! Congrats!
Click to expand...
She's also an outstanding scientist, and a nice person.
:whistling
 
bill smith said:
What a joke. Have a look at his link Readers. This is his idea of the wreckage of two half-million ton buildings and sundry other smaller skyscrapers.

Have you ever seen desperation to match this ? lol
Click to expand...

4 minutes is not a week!
 
WTC Dust said:
A computer is a tool, not a pacifier like football and bling.
Click to expand...

Oh, my bad, I thought you said "shiny things", I didn't know a football was shiny! I also didn't realize that "bling" is actually some sort of object, I though it was a word to describe something that is shiny or polished or is well accessorized!
 
bill smith said:
Work it out for yourself . I think the Readers get the picture of a missing 10 MILES if MASSIVE core columns. That will do me.
Click to expand...
You are a liar, no steel was missing, you are making insane claims based on nothing. Why do you lie about 911?

Retract your statement, retract your idiotic lie or provide proof. You have no evidence, you failed.
 
wow i have night off the web and another 10 pages appear.

you guys have some stamina.
 
bill smith said:
What a joke. Have a look at his link Readers. This is his idea of the wreckage of two half-million ton buildings and sundry other smaller skyscrapers.

Have you ever seen desperation to match this ? lol
Click to expand...

Every time a truther opens their mouth. Do you know how large of an area that is? Here's a hint, the WTC complex was right at 16 acres of land with multiple stories beneath the surface.
 
Last edited:
bill smith said:
No I am talking about there being almost no rubble in the footprints of the Twin Towers themselves let alone the surrounding streets. I invite the Readers to watch the video in the post above (number 2734) about the new FOIA release. You can see the firemen strolling around close to the stiill-standing and leaning perimeter columns like they were walking in the park.
Click to expand...

Bill is right about the relative lack of debris inside the footprints. When I went to visit Ground Zero on Day 3 after the attacks, I knew where to look for the buildings, and there was nothing there! At least nothing I could see above a ten foot fence from two blocks away.

When you hear a building collapsed, you expect to see a pile of building right where the building used to be, not dust spread all over half the city and pieces of the building spread out but almost none where the building used to be.
 
phunk said:
That was not my assertion. My post was in reply to the one immediately before it, which was about amount of drywall present in the buildings. I was merely mentioning another huge source of dust.
Click to expand...

Why didn't we find the toilets and sinks? There must have been at least a few thousand in the WTC complex.
 
phiwum said:
That evidence wouldn't be enough. You're speaking of evidence that you found the dust near the WTC site nine years after 9/11. I'm speaking of evidence that the dust was deposited there on that day.

Do you have any evidence of that?
Click to expand...

The dust I found was deposited on 9/11.
 
DGM said:
The cranes that lifted the steel and the rest of the building materials up in the first place. Add to that the elevators that brought all the building contents up. We can simplify this by saying gravity. I see you said "nearly" free-fall. There's your answer.
Click to expand...

OK, great. Take the difference between free fall speed and the actual speed, and that's all the energy you have left over for pulverization. Heck of a lot of pulverization for not much energy (if you're stuck with gravity only).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom