WTC dust

[WTC Dust]

Hey Dr Blevins, you've got to admit: the JREF crew did correctly identify you, thru your writing style and beliefs, even though you've refused to come clean.

You see? We do know what we're talking about. You have been exposed more than you can imagine, I think.

I've never hidden my identity. What have I been exposed on? I already told you what makes most of you very mad, that at least some of the dust came from steel.

It's a radical result, I realize. It changes everything, I know. You can try and say that I'm not a scientist (but that won't work). You can try and say that I'm not a New Yorker (but that won't work). You can try and say that I don't have any results (but that won't work).

What you need to do to get me to change my tune is to debunk my results. If you successfully do this, then you might be surprised how quickly I dump parts or even all of my theory. But not without the debunking.

 

[WTC Dust]

I find this absolutely hilarious.

We have an "unknown" weapon which can somehow, miraculously turn steel into dust ala a DEW style weapon.

Something which would need a massive nuclear reactor (or some other power source) and Billions of dollars to develop, and it isn't owned by the US government.

It is owned by "terrorists."

Now that just puts you in the Billy Smith and Janny level of crazy. Thanks for playing. Have a nice life.

P.s. you should ask your dr if lithium bicarbonate is right for you... it might help.

Metallic dust proves my point. Do you know how to make metallic dust? Do airplane crashes generally result in metallic dust?

 

[9/11 Chewy Defense]

I've never hidden my identity. What have I been exposed on? I already told you what makes most of you very mad, that at least some of the dust came from steel.

It's a radical result, I realize. It changes everything, I know. You can try and say that I'm not a scientist (but that won't work). You can try and say that I'm not a New Yorker (but that won't work). You can try and say that I don't have any results (but that won't work).

What you need to do to get me to change my tune is to debunk my results. If you successfully do this, then you might be surprised how quickly I dump parts or even all of my theory. But not without the debunking.

Sorry, but Star Wars based DEWs don't exist in this world:

December 2007

http://www.acq.osd.mil/dsb/reports/ADA476320.pdf

For some applications, directed energy has potential to compete favorably with kinetic solutions; for others, no adequate kinetic approach currently exists.

So if a DEW didn't exist in 2007, that would mean that it never existed in 2001.

 

[WTC Dust]

And for the #2 "scientist" in the world on 9/11 and DEW, these startling revelations will be revealed in a small place with up to 50 people paying $10 each to hear it...

Why isn't the #2 "scientist" in the world on these issues presenting at a material science convention? or a physics convention? or part of a panel presentation about these issues?

(I'm giving a presentation to my professional colleagues this coming weekend and will have more than 50 people in attendance, and I'm scheduled to present my work at an international conference in march covering how my classes are using technology to further their education. All I had to do was submit my paper outline in a call for papers... no fee, no issues and lo and behold I was invited to present my findings. Why can't any truther ever match those simple ideas and practices? Beyond the normal fact that they are all ******* crazy)

First of all, I am pursuing an academic venue for my studies. Secondly, you know the real reason why there is no one who is seriously, scientifically questioning the official story, and it's not because the official story is true.

It's because people are scared. Academic research into 9/11 is very heavily frowned upon. As soon as a professor would begin to question 9/11, he or she would be attacked, and tenure doesn't exist any more. Professors don't have real academic freedom these days, which is sad.

 

[DGM]

Metallic dust proves my point. Do you know how to make metallic dust? Do airplane crashes generally result in metallic dust?

You make it every time you step on the brakes in your car. There's metal dust everywhere.

 

[WTC Dust]

My 2 cents:

I believe that WTC Dust is Judy Wood in sheeps clothing fellas.

I've been accused of being Judy Wood in every single forum I've visited.
The truth isn't on your side on that one.

One thing is that I think it's fantastic that the top two scientists in 9/11 studies are both female. That females could get the right answer when males have failed probably bruises the ego a bit.

 

[WTC Dust]

I know I am right.



Yes it is. It has been over for a long time.



The people who physically carried out the attacks are dead. Crashing a plane at high speed into a building or the ground will tend to do that.

As far as the man alive most responsible, he has been in custody since 2003.



Yeah, of course. Arabs terrorists did it. They admit that they did it. So of course we are going after them

Our country tortured that confession out of KSM, so it doesn't count. Zach Moussaoui was forced to testify while wearing a stun belt. This isn't within the Constitution. Our Constitution allows you to defend yourself.

 

[WTC Dust]

A $10 ha head Seminar and a Book. So the real motives come out at last.

This thread is over then

Bye.

I have to charge money for the seminar in order to pay for the room. I don't get to keep the money. I think it's fair to charge for my own book, don't you? And you can watch the seminar on USTREAM for free.

 

[WTC Dust]

Ahem, Ms. Dust, care to address this?

I'm not a Ms.

 

[WTC Dust]

You make it every time you step on the brakes in your car. There's metal dust everywhere.

OK, good answer. Metal dust can be generated by physical abrasion. Any other methods?

 

[DGM]

OK, good answer. Metal dust can be generated by physical abrasion. Any other methods?

Do you agree it would be expected to find metallic dust in a city environment?

 

[WTC Dust]

I have to charge money for the seminar in order to pay for the room. I don't get to keep the money. I think it's fair to charge for my own book, don't you? And you can watch the seminar on USTREAM for free.

Also, I forgot to add that I got the idea of the seminar because so many people on this group were asking me to give them all I've got. So I'm doing that. The seminar will be saved online (probably put up on Youtube) so you will be able to watch it at your leisure if you can't logon to USTREAM. But if you do watch live, you'll be able to ask questions and get answers live.

 

[Mikemcc]

I've been accused of being Judy Wood in every single forum I've visited.
The truth isn't on your side on that one.

One thing is that I think it's fantastic that the top two scientists in 9/11 studies are both female. That females could get the right answer when males have failed probably bruises the ego a bit.

I take it that your field of expertise is not one of the physical sciences? It's simply that you've completely failed to explain the energy discrepancy between what's required to destroy the towers and what was (or even still is) available. It would require something even more powerful than the NIF, and that's hardly mobile.

Nor have you addressed the issue of what happened to all of the energy that didn't couple with the structures, through scattering, reflection, etc. Why didn't this energy affect any of the surrounding structures, people, etc?

 

[WTC Dust]

Do you agree it would be expected to find metallic dust in a city environment?

But would you expect to find metallic dust in the midst of WTC dust?

 

[DGM]

But would you expect to find metallic dust in the midst of WTC dust?

Sure. How about left over from construction (we don't sweep floor pans well before the concretes poured) or elevator brakes. What steps did you take to isolate your dust from background contamination. In other words, how do you know your dust is only from the WTC site?

 

[Architect]

It's because people are scared. Academic research into 9/11 is very heavily frowned upon. As soon as a professor would begin to question 9/11, he or she would be attacked, and tenure doesn't exist any more. Professors don't have real academic freedom these days, which is sad.

Yes, that's right. All those people in other countries, even the ones opposed to the US, are scared.

 

[9/11 Chewy Defense]

I've been accused of being Judy Wood in every single forum I've visited.
The truth isn't on your side on that one.

One thing is that I think it's fantastic that the top two scientists in 9/11 studies are both female. That females could get the right answer when males have failed probably bruises the ego a bit.

We aren't dumb you know, Judy Wood does have alias's.

Atleast us guys don't go through periods, maybe except if we're in hockey. Sorry ladies, pun wasn't intended for all of you.

 

[WildCat]

OK, good answer. Metal dust can be generated by physical abrasion. Any other methods?

Welding.

 

[W.D.Clinger]

It's because people are scared. Academic research into 9/11 is very heavily frowned upon. As soon as a professor would begin to question 9/11, he or she would be attacked, and tenure doesn't exist any more. Professors don't have real academic freedom these days, which is sad.

Cool story, sis'.

One thing is that I think it's fantastic that the top two scientists in 9/11 studies are both female. That females could get the right answer when males have failed probably bruises the ego a bit.

Cool story, sis'.

I take it that your field of expertise is not one of the physical sciences?

She has identified herself as a pharmacologist. I assume this thread began with some unfortunate experiment.

 

[Justin39640]

Welding.

Grinding welds down etc. When you grind something (on purpose or by accident in metal to metal contact) a lot of it is very small particles or what you could loosely call "dust".

My experience as a mechanic destroys her experience with a PHD in regards to metal and how it can fall apart (cause I've observed the result thousands of times, complete with "dust").

I have a machine in my shop now. A powerful electric motor spun its woodruff key and ground itself down as well as the ID of its coupling to the gearbox. There was "dust" everywhere. Should I quote my customer that his armature shaft and coupling were destroyed by a DEW and that he should really check his ceiling for nefarious energy emitting devices?