• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

WTC dust

Status
Not open for further replies.
Originally Posted by WTC Dust
Look at images of the WTC complex before WTC 2 went down. Then look at images of the WTC complex after WTC 2 went down.

DUST! Dust appeared where a building used to be.

and 300,000 tons of steel behind the dust.
 
I think we need to look back before I respond:

WTC Dust said:
But what about the supporting steel "trusses" underneath every floor? What about the thick steel beams running vertically from deep into the ground up to the 110th floor?

So it was much more than 4 inches X 110.

And you have to account for all the dust spread all over town. And you have to account for the continuing fumes that emanated from Ground Zero for more than a year.
Click to expand...
Newtons Bit said:
The steel beams around the core elevators might survive (some were quite stout), however the trusses would be bent over sideways. They're rather deep and are comprised of very light steel sections. They can't handle any forces except pure vertical.
Click to expand...

WTC Dust said:
This is utter BS. The steel beams of the WTC were made to handle the horizontal forces of a hurricane. Ignorance bothers me. Steel doesn't turn into dust if you subject it to an office fire.
Click to expand...

DGM said:
Ignorance bothers me too. Why do you claim to understand how the towers were built and then make a post like this? It show very clearly you don't know what your talking about.
Click to expand...

WTC Dust said:
I hope you aren't saying that the Twin Towers were built in such a way that they had no resistance to horizontal forces. This would be stupid. Hurricanes happen, and those buildings withstood many storms during their years, although not a direct hit from a hurricane.

Wind presses against a building horizontally. Of course the Twin Towers were built with strong resistance to horizontal forces. To say anything else is bizarre.
Click to expand...

I don't think I can add to that.

:rolleyes:
 
WTC Dust said:
Skyscrapers collapsing? Give me one other example.
Click to expand...

Hey, I'm with you. The thing is, this isn't even new! They demolished the Murrah building (after the bombing) with Energy Weapons, too. You can see all the dust created by this fairly small building which was presumably prepared for implosion. Too much to be dry wall and stuff. They must have zapped the steel with lasers or some such.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wn9qY5a7rmY

If that's not proof of dustifying energy devices, I don't know what is.
 
WTC Dust said:
I hope you aren't saying that the Twin Towers were built in such a way that they had no resistance to horizontal forces. This would be stupid. Hurricanes happen, and those buildings withstood many storms during their years, although not a direct hit from a hurricane.

Wind presses against a building horizontally. Of course the Twin Towers were built with strong resistance to horizontal forces. To say anything else is bizarre.
Click to expand...

And you think the trusses resisted those horizontal forces and not the perimeter skin, diaphragm and perimeter moment frames?
 
if the WTC was turned to dust, what the hell were the workers doing down there for 2 years?

carting away the dust?

lolololololool
 
Originally Posted by nvidiot
The steel was not turned to dust. Got any evidence that there was a significant deficit of steel in the wreckage?
Click to expand...
WTC Dust said:
Yes. Look at the pictures of the recovery efforts. You will note that, where there were once huge buildings, there was a relatively short pile of debris.
Click to expand...

The towers were 95% air and much of the debris sank into the several levels of sub-basement under the towers.

My daily commute took me up Church Ave and we could see the flatbed trucks hauling steel beams out. It went on for months. The people that kept count say they recovered the expected hundreds of thousands of tons of steel the original plans called for.

Were these people lying?
 
Thunder said:
Originally Posted by WTC Dust [qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/helloworld2/buttons/viewpost.gif[/qimg]
The steel of the World Trade Center became dust, almost entirely.

I have been at JREF since 2006, and this is the biggest, purest, 100% lie I have ever seen.

I have never been so confident of a statement being a lie, than this one.
Click to expand...

It's not a lie, dear Thunder. It's the truth, which exposes the lie you've believed for all these years.

Interesting to me that you say it's the biggest lie, which means it's actually the biggest truth you've come across since 2006. And I agree. It's a really big, obvious, world-history changing truth.

The WTC became almost entirely dust.
 
GlennB said:
Yeah sure

[qimg]http://i250.photobucket.com/albums/gg274/sap-guy/tallrubblepile-1.jpg[/qimg]

[qimg]http://i250.photobucket.com/albums/gg274/sap-guy/WTC1debrispile.jpg[/qimg]
Click to expand...

You're point? I'm talking about during the immediate aftermath of 9/11. Not after they had already begun moving things around.
 
So is he basically saying they went in and cleaned up ground zero with a few Shop Vacs and some dust pans? 'Cause all the steel turned to dust? Really?
 
dtugg said:
Prediction: WTC Dust/Tracy/Medical Marijuana Barbie will handwave this away:

Click to expand...

You're not trying to say a plane crash turned that building into dust, are you? Unless I'm mistaken, which happens on a rare occasion, that building was destroyed by explosives. You're not trying to say that explosives turned the WTC into dust, are you?
 
GlennB said:
Yeah sure

[qimg]http://i250.photobucket.com/albums/gg274/sap-guy/tallrubblepile-1.jpg[/qimg]

[qimg]http://i250.photobucket.com/albums/gg274/sap-guy/WTC1debrispile.jpg[/qimg]
Click to expand...

These photographs were taken AFTER the cleanup had already begun. Not on Day 3, the day I was referring to.
 
WTC Dust said:
You're point? I'm talking about during the immediate aftermath of 9/11. Not after they had already begun moving things around.
Click to expand...

So are you saying they gathered all that stuff and formed it into piles to fool us sheep that the tower's weren't dustified? Very clever those NWO. And quite the busy bees.

Dude. As the time went on, and they began "moving things around" those piles actually got SMALLER.
 
Dave Rogers said:
Have you ever looked at what's left after a fire? Dust. Lots of it. Wood ash, paper ash, soot - it's all, more or less, dust.

What is it with truthers? A three-year-old can see how stupid this idea is.

Dave
Click to expand...

It takes a research scientist to figure out what actually happened, as opposed to an internet debunker.

There are two things that you might never be able to convince me:
1. That an airplane crash could result in this damage.
2. That thermite caused this damage.

Don't even bother trying, unless you've got something that nobody else has.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom