• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

WTC dust

Status
Not open for further replies.
WTC Dust said:
But what about the supporting steel "trusses" underneath every floor? What about the thick steel beams running vertically from deep into the ground up to the 110th floor?

So it was much more than 4 inches X 110.

And you have to account for all the dust spread all over town. And you have to account for the continuing fumes that emanated from Ground Zero for more than a year.
Click to expand...

The steel beams around the core elevators might survive (some were quite stout), however the trusses would be bent over sideways. They're rather deep and are comprised of very light steel sections. They can't handle any forces except pure vertical.
 
WTC Dust said:
Don't forget my samples! They show what the other researchers show, which is a good thing. However, none of the researchers are talking sense about the dust samples, which I intend to correct and counter.

The dust samples are the strangest material you've ever seen, if you've seen it. Very, very crumbly. The interior structure is that of a foam that has somewhat solidified. And there's more than one distinct kind of dust.

Tell me how a jet fuel sparked office fire can make such a sample.
Click to expand...

Do none of your dust samples show red-grey chips ?
 
WTC Dust said:
Don't forget my samples! They show what the other researchers show, which is a good thing. However, none of the researchers are talking sense about the dust samples, which I intend to correct and counter.

The dust samples are the strangest material you've ever seen, if you've seen it. Very, very crumbly. The interior structure is that of a foam that has somewhat solidified. And there's more than one distinct kind of dust.

Tell me how a jet fuel sparked office fire can make such a sample.
Click to expand...

Ah, you're back. First, would you be kind enough to clarify whether or not you have a University degree in physics or chemistry?

You claim to be a researcher, yet you've offered no references to speak of. I'm a researcher as well, but I don't claim to have University training in the area I'm looking into: I don't.
I have several degrees in Fine Arts. Yet that info does not reveal my identity. See how easy that was? :)

Second, the dust samples. You have not been able to explain why the USGS and RJ Lee analyses of the dust are not accurate. You seem curiously unable to address the composition of the dust as measured by professionals.

Please do not evade this topic, as you are the one who introduced it.

ps, I thought you were a troll, but I'm willing to give you a chance to prove me wrong.
 
WTC Dust said:
The dust samples are the strangest material you've ever seen, if you've seen it. Very, very crumbly. The interior structure is that of a foam that has somewhat solidified. And there's more than one distinct kind of dust.
Click to expand...

My dogs excrete something very similar. I think it has to do with too much bone in the diet.

To tell the truth, I'm not really that curious about it, but to each his own.
 
WTC Dust said:
Don't forget my samples! They show what the other researchers show, which is a good thing. However, none of the researchers are talking sense about the dust samples, which I intend to correct and counter.

The dust samples are the strangest material you've ever seen, if you've seen it. Very, very crumbly. The interior structure is that of a foam that has somewhat solidified. And there's more than one distinct kind of dust.

Tell me how a jet fuel sparked office fire can make such a sample.
Click to expand...

The dust was not caused by a fire, the dust was caused by the collapse of millions of pounds on steel and concrete on things like drywall and foam insulation.
 
WTC Dust said:
But what about the supporting steel "trusses" underneath every floor? What about the thick steel beams running vertically from deep into the ground up to the 110th floor?

So it was much more than 4 inches X 110.

And you have to account for all the dust spread all over town. And you have to account for the continuing fumes that emanated from Ground Zero for more than a year.
Click to expand...

Fumes? What fumes? Dust and such, sure, considering it was a construction site, but fumes?

Source please? Thanks.
 
WTC Dust said:
But what about the supporting steel "trusses" underneath every floor? What about the thick steel beams running vertically from deep into the ground up to the 110th floor?
Click to expand...

Yeah - what about them? What volume of material are we talking about? Can you put numbers to it?

WTC Dust said:
So it was much more than 4 inches X 110.
Click to expand...

How much more? Got numbers? Where from?

WTC Dust said:
And you have to account for all the dust spread all over town. And you have to account for the continuing fumes that emanated from Ground Zero for more than a year.
Click to expand...

So how much dust was it? Got numbers? Volume? Mass?
Fumes - would fires in the rubble explain fumes, do you think?
 
WTC Dust said:
Don't forget my samples! They show what the other researchers show, which is a good thing. However, none of the researchers are talking sense about the dust samples, which I intend to correct and counter.

The dust samples are the strangest material you've ever seen, if you've seen it. Very, very crumbly. The interior structure is that of a foam that has somewhat solidified. And there's more than one distinct kind of dust.

Tell me how a jet fuel sparked office fire can make such a sample.
Click to expand...
Tell me how you fail for 9 years as a research scientist not being able to grasp 911? Ms Research scientist can't give the equation for kinetic energy or answer the simple questions. You need some cheese with your wallboard and insulation?
 
Last edited:
AJM8125 said:
I don't believe, not for a second, that WTC Dust is a New Yorker or has been anywhere near the pile.

WTC Dust:

I've noticed that you're ignoring direct questions from people who live in NYC and have been to the WTC site.

WHY?
Click to expand...

Because he would rather keep his assertions vague and have people think he's lying than add detail and remove all doubt.
 
Jammonius harps on about 'Fumes' without explaining why rhw 'DEW' weapon would create these strange 'fumes' or what they are if not dust or smoke.
 
I'd like to know how its possible that I saw a pile of rubble that was around 40 ft. high.

I'd like to know how there are digital surveying images showing parts of the rubble at 50 feet or more.

I'd like to see a DEWer debunk the FEMA fact that 300,000 tons of steel was recovered from GZ.
 
Last edited:
WTC Dust said:
The dust samples are the strangest material you've ever seen, if you've seen it. Very, very crumbly. The interior structure is that of a foam that has somewhat solidified. And there's more than one distinct kind of dust.
Click to expand...

That sounds an awful like the spray on fire resistant material. Have you got any information as to its composition?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom